Park, Innwon (2008): Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia: Will They Be Sustainable?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_5068.pdf Download (368kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Searching for sustainable regional trade agreements (RTAs) for East Asia, we quantitatively evaluated the likely impact of proposed East Asian RTA strategies─(i) the AFTA (a being-left-alone strategy), (ii) an ASEAN Hub RTA (a hub-and-spoke type of overlapping RTA strategy), (iii) the AFTA vs a China-Japan-Korea RTA (a duplicating or competing RTA strategy), (iv) an ASEAN+3 RTA (an expansionary RTA strategy)─on the East Asian economies and the world economy with respect to consumption, production, volume of trade, and terms of trade effect by applying a multi-country and multi-sector CGE model. We found that there was no perfectly Pareto improving RTA strategy among the four different scenarios proposed for East Asia relative to the existing AFTA. However, the expansionary ASEAN+3 RTA can be a sustainable Pareto efficient policy option because the members’ gains were significantly positive enough with more evenly distributed gains between members. The effects on world welfare were also positive enough and the negative effect on nonmembers was not very significant. More interestingly, if the East Asian countries are willing to cooperate with their Pacific Basin partners to form an APEC level of RTA, the evolution toward a global trade bloc can be counted as a Pareto improvement for East Asian economies in every aspect we measure.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Korea University |
Original Title: | Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia: Will They Be Sustainable? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | regional trade agreements; sustainability; Pareto efficiency; CGE model; East Asia |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East |
Item ID: | 5068 |
Depositing User: | Innwon Park |
Date Deposited: | 01 Mar 2008 14:55 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:05 |
References: | Baldwin, Richard. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism,” NBER Working Paper Series 4465. Baldwin, Richard. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism,” NBER Working Paper Series 4465. Baldwin, Richard. 2004. “The Spoke Trap: hub and spoke bilateralism in East Asia,” KIEP CNAEC Research Series 04-02, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP). Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1993. “Regionalism and Multilateralism: an overview,” Chapter 2 in New Dimensions in Regional Integration edited by Jaime De Melo and Arvind Panagariya, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Cambridge University Press, pp. 22-51. Bhagwati, Jagdish, David Greenaway and Arvind Panagariya. 1998. “Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy.” The Economic Journal, 108, pp. 1128-1148. Chacholiades, Miltiades. 1990. International Economics, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York. Dimaranan, Betina V. and Robert A. McDougall, Editors (2006, forthcoming). Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University. Feridhanusetyawan, Tubagus. 2005. “Preferential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region.” IMF Working Paper WP/05/149. JETRO. 2003. “Prospects for Free Trade Agreements in East Asia,” Overseas Research Department, Japan External Trade Organization. Kawai, Masahiro. 2004. “Regional Economic Integration and Cooperation in East Asia,” paper prepared for the Experts’ Seminar on the Impact and Coherence of OECD Country Policies on Asian Developing Economies. Kawai, Masahiro. 2007. “Evolving Economic Architecture in East Asia,” ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 84, ADB Institute. Kawai, Masahiro and Ganeshan Wignaraja. 2007. “ASEAN+3 or ASEAN+6: Which Way Forward?” ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 77, ADB Institute. Lee, Jong-Wha and Innwon Park. 2005. “Free Trade Areas in East Asia: Discriminatory or Nondiscriminatory?” The World Economy, 28:1, pp. 21-48. Lee, Jong-Wha, Innwon Park and Kwanho Shin. 2004. “Proliferating Regional Trade Arrangements: Why and Whither?” mimeo. Lee, Jong-Wha and Kwanho Shin. 2006. “Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17:3, pp. 283-301. Lloyd, Peter. 2002. “New Bilateralism in the Asia-Pacific,” The World Economy, 25, pp.1279-1296. Lu, Feng. 2003. “Free Trade Area: Awakening regionalism in East Asia,” Working Paper Series E2003010, China Center for Economic Research. McKibbin, Warwick J. 1998. “Regional and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Effects on Trade, Investment and Welfare,” in Europe, East Asia and APEC: A Shared Global Agenda? edited by Peter Drysdale and D. Vines. Cambridge University Press, pp.195 220. McKibbin, Warwick J., Jong-Wha Lee, and Inkyo Cheong. 2004. “A Dynamic Analysis of a Korea-Japan Free Trade Area: Simulations with the G-Cubed Asia-Pacific Model,” International Economic Journal, 18, pp. 3-32. Panagariya, Arvind. 1999. “The Regionalism Debate: An Overview,” The World Economy, 22, pp. 477-511 Park, Innwon. 2006. “East Asian Regional Trade Agreements: Do They Promote Global Free Trade?” Pacific Economic Review, 11: 4, pp. 547-568. Rutherford, Thomas F. 2005. “GTAP6inGAMS: The Dataset and Static Model,” paper prepared for the Workshop on Applied General Equilibrium Modelling for Trade Policy Analysis in Russia and the CIS. Scollay, Robert, and John Gilbert. 2001. New Subregional Trading Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Sulamaa, Pekka and Mika Widgrén. 2005. “Asian Regionalism versus Global Free Trade: A Simulation Study on Economic Effects,” Discussion Papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. Umemoto, Masaru. 2003. “Hub and Spoke Integration and Income Convergence,” Working Paper Series 2003-01. The International Center for the Study of East Asian Development (ICSEAD). Urata, Shujiro and Kozo Kiyota. 2003. “The Impact of an East Asia FTA on Foreign Trade in East Asia,” NBER Working Paper Series 10173, National Bureau of Economic Research. Urata, Shujiro. 2006. “A Shift from Market-driven to Institution-driven Regionalization in East Asia,” Mimeo. Zhai Fan. 2006. “Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of ‘Hub and Spoke.’” ERD Working Paper No. 83. ADB. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/5068 |