Growth and dispersion of accounting research about New Zealand before and during a National Research Assessment Exercise: Five decades of academic journals bibliometrics

Dixon, Keith (2013): Growth and dispersion of accounting research about New Zealand before and during a National Research Assessment Exercise: Five decades of academic journals bibliometrics.

Abstract

Purpose – University academics are important to the discovery and dissemination of knowledge about accounting practice and accounting learning. This article explores the consequences for the Pacific society of New Zealand of how these discovery and dissemination activities have come to be assessed for performance management, formulaic public funding and offshore accreditation. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal, bibliometric approach is taken to how knowledge about accounting practice and accounting learning in New Zealand has been disseminated over the past half century. The approach lends itself to the question of whether the trends revealed in the bibliometrics are suited to New Zealand audiences, including students, accountants, policymakers, Aotearoa New Zealand’s indigenous people and its diverse recent-settler populations, and Pacific New Zealand Society. One hundred and sixty accounting journals and several professional magazines are searched for articles based on empirical materials drawn from New Zealand. Findings – The findings relate to the geographical locations of the editors and the rankings of the periodicals that articles have been published in, and the topics the articles cover. The findings are interpreted in the broad contexts of academic activities, university development, and tertiary education policy and funding. Of the three activities associated with accounting in New Zealand universities, research has been the last to develop, starting with occasional articles penned by a small band of professors and published in the Chartered Accountants Journal (CAJ) and The Accounting Review. Now, research is often accorded the highest priority, as reflected in formal individual academic performance measurement systems, and related institutional incentives and penalties (exemplified by the Performance Based Research Fund of 2012). Measurement is conducted at the individual and institutional level, using criteria linked to lists of periodicals that are decidedly Atlantocentric. The CAJ has been deserted in favour of academic journals, virtually all based outside New Zealand. Academics have modified the way they report to suit the foreign editors and readerships. Publication patterns continue to change. Strong incentives and coercements seem to exist for New Zealand-based academics to behave selfishly for short-term survival. These persuaders seem to be wielded by a quasi-indigenous élite seeking to mimic their supposed superior counterparts elsewhere; and to dominate their subjects, and so exercise power and maintain their status. This is regardless of what might be better from a local, societal point of view. To publish about New Zealand, there is some advantage in studying areas in which New Zealand is seen as a “world leader” (e.g., Structural Adjustment, New Public Management, environmental accounting). This contrasts with areas about which the outside world is oblivious (e.g., New Zealand’s multicultural array of people and organisations, including the Maori people) or areas in which New Zealand lacks differences of “world” interest (e.g., financial collapses and director impropriety, what can be learnt from stock exchange data). Research limitations/implications – The research is confined to basic bibliometrics (a publication analysis, rather than citation or co-citation analyses), anecdotes and comparison with secondary sources. Originality/value – This study is concerned with whether knowledge about accounting practice and accounting learning in New Zealand is being disseminated in a way that suits those likely to be most interested and affected. It is distinct from most studies of this ilk, which attempt to rank journals or are about researcher productivity and author placement.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Higher education, Bibliometrics, Colonialism, Criticism, Accounting history, Accounting research, New Zealand, Research assessment
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing; N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy

References

Adler, R. (2012). The state of accounting education scholarship in New Zealand. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 21, 545-563.

Adler, R., & Liyanarachchi, G. (2011). An empirical examination of the editorial review processes of accounting journals. Accounting and Finance, 51, 837-867.

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 819-841.

Armstrong, P. (1989). Variance reporting and the delegation of blame: A case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(2), 29-46.

Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2009). AQ/PQ status: establishing criteria for attainment and maintenance of faculty qualifications - an interpretation of AACSB standards [Online]. Available: http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/whitepapers/AQ_PQ_Status.pdf (accessed 3 October 2013).

Australian Business Deans Council. (2009). ABDC journal ratings list review 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.abdc.edu.au/3.41.0.0.1.0.htm (accessed 27 January 2010 – no longer available).

Australian Business Deans Council. (2010). ABDC journal ratings list [Online]. Available: http://www.abdc.edu.au/3.43.0.0.1.0.htm (accessed 8 November 2012).

Australian Business Deans Council. (2013a). ABDC journal ratings list and 2013 review [Online]. Available: http://www.abdc.edu.au/3.43.0.0.1.0.htm (accessed 17 May 2013).

Australian Business Deans Council. (2013b). ABDC journals quality list public exposure period feedback form [Online]. Available: http://www.vision6.com.au/forms/s/d74221c/30636/427660.html (accessed 30 September 2013).

Australian Government. (2008). Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative [Online]. Available: http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA_ConsultationPaper.pdf (accessed 6 November 2012).

Beattie, V., & Goodacre, A. (2004). Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community. British Accounting Review, 36, 7-44.

Bebbington, J., & Dillard, J. (2007). What really counts. Accounting Forum, 31, 99–105.

Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19, 929-938.

Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van der Stede, W. A., & Young, S. M. (2006). The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 663–685.

Borghans, L., & Cörvers, F. (2009). The Americanization of European higher education and research (NBER Working Paper 15217) [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15217 (accessed 13 June 2010).

Boston, J. (1988). The future of New Zealand universities: an exploration of some of the issues raised by the reports of the Watts Committee and the Treasury. Wellington: Victoria University Press.

Boston, J. (1996). The ownership, governance and accountability of tertiary institutions in New Zealand. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 6, 5-28.

Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P. (1996). Public Management: the New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

Boston, J., Mischewski, B., & Smyth, R. (2005). Performance-Based Research Fund -- implications for research in the social sciences and social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 24, 55-84.

Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: A UK Perspective. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 5-38.

Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of "contextual" accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 129-169.

Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (1999). Comparing Schools in the U.K. and New Zealand: Individualizing and Socializing Accountabilities and Some Implications for Management Control. Management Accounting Research, 10, 339–61.

Brown, R., Jones, M., & Steele, T. (2007). Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades. British Accounting Review, 39, 125–151.

Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., & Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5, 5-27.

Burrowes, A., Karayan, J., & Sage, J. (2012). New (old) directions for US accounting education. Chartered Accountants Journal, 91(9), 58-60.

Carmona, S. (2006). Performance reviews, the impact of accounting research, and the role of publication forms. Advances in Accounting, 22, 241–267.

Chan, K. C., Chang, C-H., Tong, J. Y., & Zhang, F. (2012). An analysis of the accounting and finance research productivity in Australia and New Zealand in 1991–2010. Accounting and Finance, 52, 249-265.

Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Cheng, L. T. W. (2005). Ranking research productivity in accounting for Asia-Pacific universities. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 24, 47–64.

Chan, K. C., Tong, J. Y., & Zhang, F. F. (2012). Accounting journal rankings, authorship patterns and the Author Affiliation Index. Australian Accounting Review, 22: 407–417.

Chua, W-F. (2011). In search of ‘successful’ accounting research. European Accounting Review, 20, 27-39.

Cordery, C. (2013). Does public services accounting belong in the curriculum? Pacific Accounting Review, 25, 101-116.

Coy, D., Dixon, K., & Tower, G. (1991). Tertiary education in New Zealand: Radical changes to funding and accountability. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 13, 83-93.

Coy, D., & Pratt, M. (1998). An insight into accountability and politics in universities: A case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11, 540-561.

Craig, R. J. (2007). Towards an ethos of advancing knowledge: A commentary on 'Publish or Perish: Is this really a viable set of options?' Accounting Education: An International Journal, 16, 245-249.

Daigle, R. J., & Arnold, V. (2000). An analysis of the research productivity of AIS faculty. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 1, 106–122

Dixon, K. (2009). Calculative practices in higher education: A retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning. MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Paper no. 18808) [Online]. Available: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18808/1/MPRA_paper_18808.pdf (accessed 15 February 2010).

Dixon, K. (2010a). Consequences for New Zealand accounting knowledge discovery of distant performance measurement of the academic person: A retrospective analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference [Online] Available: http://apira2010.econ.usyd.edu.au/conference_proceedings/APIRA-2010-244-Dixon-NZ-research-of-distant-performance-measurement-of-the-academic-person.pdf (accessed 12 November 2012).

Dixon, K. (2010b). Research and exposure. Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand 89(11), 46-49.

Dixon, K. (2012). A retrospective analysis of the publication of accounting research about New Zealand consequent on distant performance measurement of the academic person. Paper presented at the 6th New Zealand Management Accounting Conference, 22-23 November, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Dixon, K., & Coy, D. (2007). University governance: Governing bodies as providers and users of annual reports. Higher Education, 54, 267-291.

Education Act. No. 80 of 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0080/latest/DLM183665.html?search=qs_act%40bill%40regulation%40deemedreg_%22academic+freedom%22_resel_25_h&p=1 (accessed 30 September 2013).

Elder, V. (2012, 17 May). Ranking puts stress on university staff. Otago Daily Times [Online edition]. Available: http://www.odt.co.nz/campus/university-otago/209521/ranking-puts-stress-university-staff (accessed 30 September 2013).

Ellis, P. D., & Zhan, G. (2011). How international are the international business journals? International Business Review, 20, 100–112.

Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative. (2010). Journal title list [Online]. Available: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list.htm (accessed 15 February 2010 – no longer available).

Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative. (2012). ERA 2012 journal list [Online]. Available: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2012/era_journal_list.htm (accessed 8 November 2012).

Expert Group on Assessment of University-Based Research. (2010). Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/areas-of-actions-universities-assessing-europe-university-based-research-2010-en.pdf (accessed 6 November 2012).

Faff, R. (2013). Australian Business Deans Council journal quality list 2013 review: Instructions to submitters [Online]. Available: http://www.abdc.edu.au/download.php?id=396410,358,1 (accessed 17 May 2013).

Field, J. E. (1960). Inventory valuation and the short-run cost function. Accounting Review, 35, 104-110.

Flint, D. (1982). The accountant and research in the 1980s. Accountants’ Journal, 71(2), 73-77.

Gardner, W. J., Beardsley, E. T., & Carter, T. E. (1973). A History of the University of Canterbury 1873-1973. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

Goldfinch, S. (2003). Investing in excellence? The Performance-Based Research Fund and its implications for political science departments in New Zealand. Political Science, 55, 39-53.

Gould, J. (1988). The University Grants Committee 1961-1986: A History. Wellington: University Grants Committee.

Government of New Zealand. (2012). Vote Tertiary Education: The estimates of appropriations 2012/13 (B.5) [Online]. Available: http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2012/estimates/est12tered.pdf (accessed 8 November 2012).

Graham, A. W. (1960). The First Fifty Years: 1909–1959. Wellington: New Zealand Society of Accountants.

Hall, C., Morris, K., & Sawicka, T. (2003). Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF): Policy and practice. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 13, 79-104.

Hall, C. M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management, 32, 16-27.

Hay, D., & Maltby, H (1997). A new approach to accounting examinations: The Final Qualifying Examination in New Zealand. Journal of Accounting Education, 15, 169-179.

Hendy, S. C. 2010. New Zealand’s bibliometric record in research and development: 1990–2008. New Zealand Science Review, 67, 56–59.

Hodder, P. W., & Hodder, C. (2010). Research culture and New Zealand’s performance-based research fund: some insights from bibliographic compilations of research outputs. Scientometrics, 84, 887-901.

Hopwood, A. G. (2008). Changing pressures on the research process: On trying to research in an age when curiosity is not enough. European Accounting Review, 17, 87-96.

Horvath, R. J. (1972). A definition of colonialism. Current Anthropology, 13, 45-57.

Huber, C. (2009). Risks and risk-based regulation in higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(2), 83-95.

Hussain, S. (2010). Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings. British Accounting Review, 42, 1-16.

Hussey, R. (2007). The pretence of publishing: A beneficial conspiracy for academics. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 16, 251-254.

James, K. (2008). A Critical Theory perspective on the pressures, contradictions and dilemmas faced by entry-level accounting academics. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 1263–1295.

Just, A., Schäffer, U., & Meyer, M. (2009). The intellectual structure of accounting research - A bibliometric analysis [Online]. Available: http://accounting.rutgers.edu/RARF/Just.Schaeffer.Meyer%20paper.pdf (accessed 3 November 2013).

Kelly, A., Morris, H., Rowlinson, M., & Harvey, C. (2010). Association of Business Schools academic journal quality guide version 4 [Online]. Available: http://www.associationofbusinessschools.org/sites/default/files/Combined%20Journal%20Guide.pdf (accessed 5 December 2012).

Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2005). Neo-liberalizing spaces and subjectivities: Reinventing New Zealand universities. Organization, 12, 843-862.

Leach, F. (1993). Counterpart personnel: a review of the literature with implications for education and development. International Journal of Educational Development, 13, 315-330.

Lewis, J. M., & Ross, S. (2011). Research funding systems in Australia, New Zealand and the UK: Policy settings and perceived effects. Policy and Politics, 39, 379-398.

Liyanarachchi, G. A. (2012). Measuring research output in New Zealand: An ethical perspective Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 11, 95-122.

Locke, J., & Lowe, A. (2008). Evidence and implications of multiple paradigms in accounting knowledge production. European Accounting Review, 17, 161-191.

Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2005). Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics. Accounting Organizations and Society, 30, 81-98.

Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2006). Constructing an ‘efficient frontier’ of accounting journal quality. British Accounting Review, 38, 321–341.

Lukka, K., & Kasanen, E. (1996). Is accounting global or a local discipline? Evidence from major research journals. Accounting Organizations and Society, 21, 755-773.

Mathews, M. R. (2007a). A rejoinder to the commentaries on 'Publish or perish: Is this really a viable set of options?” Accounting Education: An International Journal, 16, 269-272.

Mathews, M. R. (2007b). Publish or perish: Is this really a viable set of options? Accounting Education: An International Journal, 16, 225-240.

Mathews, R., & Sangster, A. (2009). Exporting the RAE: adoption of similar practices in Australia and New Zealand. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(2), 115-130.

McKinnon, A. C. (2013). Starry-eyed: journal rankings and the future of logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43, 6-17.

Melo, A. I., Sarrico, C. S., & Radnor, Z. (2010). The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Management Review, 12, 233-254.

Millen, J. (1985). The New Zealand Society of Accountants 1960-1984: A history to mark the 75th Jubilee. Wellington: New Zealand Society of Accountants.

Milne, M. J. (2001). Debating accounting research journal rankings: Empirical issues from a citation-based analysis and theoretical dilemmas from economics [Online]. Available: http://www.acis.canterbury.ac.nz/documents/Markus_Milne_Research_Programmes/Debating_Accounting_Research_Journal_Rankings.pdf (accessed 31 October 2013).

Milne, M. J. (2002). The construction of journal quality: No engagement detected. Accounting Forum, 26, 72-86.

Moizer, P. (2009). Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 285–304.

Moores, K., & MacGregor, A. (1992). Accounting education in New Zealand. International Journal of Accounting, 27(1), 69-79.

Moosa, I. (2011). The demise of the ARC journal ranking scheme: An ex post analysis of the accounting and finance journals. Accounting and Finance, 51, 809-836.

Morrell, W. P. (1960). Britain in the Pacific Islands. London: Oxford University Press.

Murphy, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization, 19, 915-927.

Nagy, J., & Robb, A. (2008). Can universities be good corporate citizens? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 1414–1430.

National Tertiary Education Union. (2012). After the journal rankings, manipulation will continue. ERA Watch [Online]. Available: http://www.erawatch.org.au/concerns (accessed 16 November 2012).

Neumann, R., & Guthrie, J. (2002). The corporatization of research in Australian higher education. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 721–741.

Njoku, J. C., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Inanga, E. L. (2010). Fusion of expertise among accounting faculty: Towards an expertise model for academia in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 51–62.

Northcott, D., & Linacre, S. (2010). Producing spaces for academic discourse: The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings. Australian Accounting Review, 20, 38-54.

Office of the Minister for Tertiary Education. (2009). Tertiary education strategy 2010-2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/PolicyAndStrategy/~/media/MinEdu/Files/TheMinistry/TertiaryEducationStrategy2010/TES2010to2015.pdf (accessed 8 November 2012).

Olssen, M. (2002). The restructuring of tertiary education in New Zealand: Governmentality, neo-liberalism, democracy. McGill Journal of Education, 37, 57-87.

Otley, D. (2003). Management control and performance management: whence and whither? British Accounting Review, 35, 309-326.

Parker, L. D. (2007). Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: the role of the editorial board. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 4(3), 168-182.

Parker, L. D. (2011a). Building bridges to the future: Mapping the territory for developing social and environmental accountability. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31, 7-24.

Parker, L. (2011b). University corporatisation: Driving redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 434-450.

Parker, L. D., Guthrie, J., & Gray, R. (1998). Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11, 371-402.

Parker, L. D., Guthrie, J., & Linacre, R. (2011). The relationship between academic accounting research and professional practice. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24, 5-14.

Parton, H. (1979). The University of New Zealand. Wellington: University Grants Committee.

Patterson, G. (2001). The applicability of institutional goals to the university organisation, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23, 159-169.

Pettersen, I-J., & Solstad, E. (2007). The role of accounting information in a reforming area: a study of higher education institutions. Financial Accountability and Management, 23, 133–154.

Pop-Vasileva, A., Baird, K., & Blair, B. (2011). University corporatisation: The effect on academic work-related attitudes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24, 408-439.

Prather-Kinsey, J. J., & Rueschhoff, N. G. (2004). An analysis of international accounting research in U.S.- and non-U.S.-based academic accounting journals. Journal of International Accounting Research, 3, 63-81.

Quacquarelli Symonds. (2013). QS World University Rankings [Online]. Available at: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings (accessed 30 September 2013).

Qu, S. Q., Ding, S., & Lukasewich, S. M. (2009). Research the American Way: The role of US elites in disseminating and legitimizing Canadian academic accounting research, European Accounting Review, 18, 515-569.

Raffournier, B., & Schatt, A. (2010). Is European accounting research fairly reflected in academic journals? An investigation of possible non-mainstream and language barrier biases. European Accounting Review, 19, 161-190.

Reinstein, A., & Calderon, T. G. (2006). Examining accounting departments’ rankings of the quality of accounting journals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 457–490.

Reinstein, A., & Hasselback, J. R. (1997). A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty members. Journal of Accounting Education, 15, 425-455.

Roa, T., Beggs, J. R., Williams, J., and Moller, H. (2009). New Zealand's Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model undermines Maori research. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 39, 233-238.

Roberts, P. (2007). Neoliberalism, performativity and research. International Review of Education, 53, 349-365.

Roberts, W. A., Johnson, R., & Groesbeck, J. (2004). The faculty perspective on the impact of AACSB accreditation. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 8(1), 111-125.

Roberts, W. A., Johnson, R., & Groesbeck, J. (2006). The perspective of faculty hired after AACSB accreditation on accreditation’s impact and importance. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(3), 59-71.

Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173-205.

Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2006). How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing. European Business Review, 18, 422-436.

Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2009). Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index. British Accounting Review, 41, 227-239.

Sangster, A. (2011). The ABS journal quality guide: A personal view. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 20, 575-580.

Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18, 15-29.

Smart, W. (2008). The impact of the performance-based research fund on the research productivity of New Zealand universities. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 34, 136-151.

Strathdee, R. (2011). Educational reform, inequality and the structure of higher education in New Zealand. Journal of Education and Work, 24, 27-48.

Taylor, R. L., & Stanton, A. (2009). Academic publishing and teaching effectiveness: An attitudinal study of AACSB accredited business school faculty. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13, 93-106.

ter Bogt, H. J., & Scapens, R. W. (2012). Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. European Accounting Review, 21, 451-497.

Tertiary Education Commission. (2004). Performance-Based Research Fund - evaluating research excellence: The 2003 assessment [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Reports%20and%20other%20documents/PBRF-Evaluating%20Research%20Excellence-the-2003-assessment.pdf (accessed 6 May 2013).

Tertiary Education Commission. (2006). Performance-Based Research Fund - evaluating research excellence: The 2006 assessment [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Publications/pbrf-full-report-2006.pdf (accessed 24 February 2010).

Tertiary Education Commission. (2008). Performance-Based Research Fund – 2012 Quality Evaluation: Consultation paper 1 [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Reports%20and%20other%20documents/pbrf-consultation-paper-one.pdf (accessed 24 February 2010).

Tertiary Education Commission. (2011). Funding mechanism: Performance-Based Research Fund [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Ministerial%20determinations/Funding-Determination-PBRF-2011-12.pdf (accessed 29 September 2013).

Tertiary Education Commission. (2012). Performance-based research fund [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Funding/Fund-finder/Performance-Based-Research-Fund-PBRF-/ (accessed 8 November 2012).

Tertiary Education Commission. (2013). Performance-Based Research Fund: Evaluating research excellence – the 2012 Assessment: Interim report [Online]. Available at: http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Reports%20and%20other%20documents/PBRF-Assessment-Interim-Report-2012.pdf (accessed 21 May 2013).

Thatcher, M. (1987). Interview for Woman's Own [Online]. Available at: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689 (accessed 30 September 2013).

Times Higher Education (2013) THE world university rankings [Online]. Available at: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/world-ranking (accessed 30 September 2013).

Treasury. (1990). Putting it simply: An explanatory guide to financial management reform. Wellington: Government Printing Office.

Trow, D. G., & Zeff, S. A. (2010). Accounting education and the profession in New Zealand: Profiles of the pioneering academics and the early university accounting departments 1900-1970. Wellington: New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.

University Grants Committee Review Committee (Chair: A. D. Brownlie, University of Canterbury) (1982). Final Report. Wellington: University Grants Committee Review Committee.

Urbancic, F. R. (2009). Individual and institutional contributors to research in accounting education. Accounting Educators’ Journal, 19, 21-44.

Waitere, H. J., Wright, J., Tremaine, M., Brown, S., & Pausé, C. J. (2011). Choosing whether to resist or reinforce the new managerialism: The impact of performance‐based research funding on academic identity. Higher Education Research and Development, 30, 205-217.

Ward, J. M. (1946). British policy in the South Pacific (1786-1893). Sydney: Australasian Publishing.

Wells, M. C. (1966). Management Attitudes. Abacus, 2, 184-194.

Wilkinson, B. R., & Durden, C. H. (1998). A study of accounting faculty publishing productivity in New Zealand. Pacific Accounting Review, 10(2), 75-95.

Wilkinson, B. R., Durden, C. H., & Wilkinson, K. J. (2003). A Tobit analysis of accounting faculty publishing productivity in Australian and New Zealand universities. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 6, 173-186.

Willmott, H. (2003). Commercialising higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 129-41.

Willmott, H. C. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list [Online]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1753627 (accessed 5 October 2013).

Wilson, R. M. S., Ravenscroft, S. P., Rebele J. E., & St. Pierre, K. (2008). The case for accounting education research. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17, 103-111.

Wise, V., & Fisher, C. (2005). Scholarly journal output: A regional perspective. Asian Review of Accounting, 13(2), 68-83.