Revisiting the trade effects of services agreements

Shingal, Anirudh (2013): Revisiting the trade effects of services agreements.

Abstract

The proliferation of services trade agreements and improved availability of data on bilateral services trade flows has resulted in a growing literature on the theoretical and empirical assessment of services trade effects. In this paper, we revisit the trade effects of services agreements using an updated database on bilateral services trade flows from the OECD and based on recent developments in the estimation of structural gravity models. Our results suggest a services trade effect of 13.7% at the intensive margin, with significantly higher estimates for intra-EU trade. However, the trade effect becomes weakly significant when the estimation includes zero trade flows. Incorporation of anticipation effects in the analyses accentuates the average treatment effect significantly (and monotonically with time) but only at the intensive margin.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Services trade, PTAs, gravity model, endogeneity, anticipation effects
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration

References

Anderson, J. E., Milot, C. A., and Yotov, Y. V. (2011). The incidence of geography on canada's services trade. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2002). On the endogeneity of international trade flows and free trade agreements. Unpublished manuscript.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2004). Economic determinants of free trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 64(1):29-63.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of international Economics, 71(1):72-95.

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). Bonus vetus ols: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics, 77(1):77-85.

Baldwin, R. and Harrigan, J. (2011). Zeros, quality, and space: Trade theory and trade evidence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(2):60-88.

Ceglowski, J. (2006). Does gravity matter in a service economy? Review of World Economics, 142(2):307-329.

Colin, C. A. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications.

Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (2001). Trade in capital goods. European Economic Review, 45(7):1195-1235.

Egger, H., Egger, P., and Greenaway, D. (2008). The trade structure effects of endogenous regional trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 74(2):278-298.

Egger, P., Larch, M., and Staub, K. E. (2012). Trade preferences and bilateral trade in goods and services: A structural approach. Technical report, CEPR Discussion Papers.

Egger, P., Larch, M., Staub, K. E., and Winkelmann, R. (2011). The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3):113-143.

Grünfeld, L. A. and Moxnes, A. (2003). The intangible globalization: Explaining the patterns of international trade in services. Norwegian Institute for International Affairs. Working Paper, (657-2003).

Guimaraes, P. and Portugal, P. (2010). A simple feasible procedure to fit models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata Journal, 10(4):628.

Harrigan, J. (1996). Openness to trade in manufactures in the oecd. Journal of international economics, 40(1):23-39.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2013). Gravity equations: Toolkit, cookbook, workhorse. Handbook of International Economics, 4.

Head, K., Mayer, T., and Ries, J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(1):1-14.

Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 153-161.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M., and Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2):441-487.

Kimura, F. and Lee, H. (2006). The gravity equation in international trade in services. Review of world economics, 142(1):92-121.

Kox, H. and Lejour, A. (2006). The effects of the services directive on intra-eu trade and fdi. Revue Economique, 57(4):747-769.

Lennon, C. (2008). Trade in services and trade in goods: Differences and complementarities. WIIW Working Papers 53.

Magee, C. S. (2004). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: an empirical analysis. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1):1-17.

Marchetti, J. (2011). Do economic integration agreements lead to deeper integration of services markets? International Handbook on the Economics of Integration: Factor, Mobility, Agriculture, Environment and Quantitative Studies, 3:435.

Mirza, D. and Nicoletti, G. (2004). What is so special about trade in services. research paper 2004/02. University of Nottingham.

Santos Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4):641-658.

Santos Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2010). On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in poisson regression. Economics Letters, 107(2):310-312.

Santos Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2011). Poisson: some convergence issues. Stata journal, 11(2):207-212.

Sauvé, P. and Shingal, A. (2011). Reflections on the preferential liberalization of services trade. Journal of World Trade, 45(5):953.

Shingal, A. (2009). How much do agreements matter for services trade? MPRA paper 32815.

Van Wincoop, E. and Anderson, J. E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1):170-192.

Walsh, K. (2006). Trade in services: Does gravity hold? a gravity model approach to estimating barriers to services trade. Technical report, IIIS.