Sequeira, Tiago and Santos, Marcelo and Ferreira-Lopes, Alexandra (2013): Why Inventions Occurred in Some Countries and Not in Others?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51553.pdf Download (154kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The reasons why inventions that shaped industrial revolutions, occurred in the UK and in the USA, have been suggested by economic historians. For the first time,we access the determinants of more than a hundred inventions around the world, explaining why they occurred in a given country and why some occurred earlier than others. We confirm the importance of scale effects and dismiss the importance of education as triggers of inventions. Geographic and genetic distance from the UK and the USA have proven to be significant in explaining inventions. Both distance from the UK and proximity to the USA seem to have significant effect on the rise of the probability to invent and on the probability to invent earlier.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Why Inventions Occurred in Some Countries and Not in Others? |
English Title: | Why Inventions Occurred in Some Countries and Not in Others? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Inventions; Industrial Revolutions; TFP; Determinants of Development |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N10 - General, International, or Comparative N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy > N30 - General, International, or Comparative O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O50 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General |
Item ID: | 51553 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Tiago Sequeira |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2013 21:08 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 16:24 |
References: | Allen, R. (2009a). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Allen, R. (2009b). Engels ’Pause: Technical Change, Capital Accumulation, and Inequality in the British Industrial Revolution Explorations in Economic History, 46: 418—445. Bolt, J. and J. L. van Zanden (2013). The First Update of the Maddison Project; Re-Estimating Growth Before 1820. Maddison Project Working Paper 4. Broadberry, S. B. Campbell, A. Klein, M. Overton, and B. van-Leeuwen (2011). British Economic Growth, 1270-1870: An Output-based Approach. University of Kent School of Economics Discussion Papers, KDPE 1203. Clark, G. (1996). The Political Foundations of Modern Economic Growth: England 1540-1800. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 26 (4): 563-588. Crafts, N. and C. Harley (1992). Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: A Re-statement of the Crafts-Harley View. Economic History Review,45 (4): 703-730. Crafts,N (2004). Productivity Growth in the Industrial Revolution: A New Growth Accounting Perspective, Journal of Economic History, 64 (2): 521-535 Comin, D. and B. Hobijn (2009). The CHAT dataset. NBER Working Paper 15319. Comin,D.,W. Easterly, and E.Gong(2010). Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in 1000 BC? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2 (3): 65-97. Easterlin, R. A. (1981). Why Isn’t the Whole World Developed? Journal of Economic History, 41 (1): 1-19. Galor, O. (2005). From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A, ch. 4, Edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier, North-Holland. Gómez, M. and T. N. Sequeira (2012). Phases of Economic Development: Do Initial Endowments Matter? The BE Journal of Macroeconomics (Topics),12(1): Article 21. Greasley, D and L. Oxley (2007). Patenting, Intellectual Property Rights and Sectoral Outputs in Industrial Revolution in Britain, 1780-1851. Journal of Econometrics, 139: 340-354. Iacopetta, M. (2010). Phases of Economic Development and the Transitional Dynamics of an Innovation-education Growth Model. European Economic Review, 54(2): 317—330. Mayer, T. Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPIIs distances measures : the GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper 2011-25. Mokyr, J. (2005). Mobility, Creativity and Technological Development. Prepared for the session on “Creativity and the Economy”, German Association of Philosophy,Berlin, Sept. 18, 2005. Mokyr,J.(2009). The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700-1850. New Haven: Yale University Press. Mitchell, B. (1998). Historical Statistics. 4th Edition, New York: Stockton Press Spolaore, E. and R. Wacziarg (2011). Long-Term Barriers to the International Diffusion of Inventions. NBER Working Paper 17271. Stockey,N. (2001). A Quantitative Model of the British Industrial Revolution, 1780-1850. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,55: 55-109. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51553 |