Gawlik, Remigiusz and Gorynia, Marian and Teczke, Janusz (2005): Malopolska science and business units - in quest for the missing link. Published in: Proceedings of the Science Marketing 4th International Science-to-Business Conference (October 2005)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_52192.pdf Download (318kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper aims at answering the question how to persuade the managers of business units to use the research outcome of universities, independent research and development units, Think – Tanks and other science – oriented organizations. The basic assumption is that such an exchange should be based on short-, middle-, and long – term profits that could be realized by its both sides. The authors analyzed a group of universities and companies mainly from the Polish region of Malopolska and shared their considerations in the presented paper. The research focused on identifying the qualities that R&D units could possibly offer to business and on elaborating the mechanisms of knowledge transfer including an appropriate pay for the scientific side. The performed research led to a conclusion that an intermediary unit should be operating in order to contact R&D and science units with their future business partners. The authors described the main features and tasks of such a unit, identifying its financing possibilities both from the business, but also from various foundation and public funds. The awaited outcome should be a stable knowledge exchange system, dynamically adapting to the market needs, but also leaving the scientists some freedom of choosing their research topics. This should protect us from a situation where all the research would be business – oriented and possible exclusively after a company order. If implemented all over the European Union, such a system could be a useful tool for making the realization of the Lisbon Strategy more likely.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Malopolska science and business units - in quest for the missing link |
English Title: | Malopolska science and business units - in quest for the missing link |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Science Marketing, Business Spin – Out, Research Commercialization, R&D Units |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H52 - Government Expenditures and Education Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 52192 |
Depositing User: | Ph.D. Remigiusz Gawlik |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2013 14:43 |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2019 04:14 |
References: | BALASUBRAMANYAM V. (1973), International Transfer of Technology to India, New York: Praeger Scientific Press. BARANSON J. & A. HARRINGTON (1977), Industrial Transfers of Technology by U.S. Firms under Licensing Arrangements: Policies, Practices and Conditioning Factors, Washington, DC: Developing World Industry and Technology, Inc. BEGG D. & R. PORTES (1992), Enterprise Debt and Economic Transformation: Financial Restructuring of the State Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 695, June. BRUNNER H.P. (1993), Entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe: Neither Magic nor Mirage. A Preliminary Investigation, Journal of Economic Issues, 27: 505-513. CHEN E. (1996), Transnational corporations and technology transfer to developing countries, In CHILD, J. & A. CZEGLEDY A., Managerial Learning in the Transformation of Eastern Europe: Some Key Issues, Organization Studies, 17 (2): 167-179. COHEN W.& D. LEVINTHAL (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152. COUDERC A. M. & V. FRANCESCHI (1998), Sputnik Enterprises: High Technology Enterprise Creation in Russia, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, University of Sussex. CUERVO A. & B. VILLALLONGA (2000), Explaining the Variance in the Performance Effects of Privatization, The Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 581-590. DABIC, GORYNIA, HAUDEVILLE, National Differences in Technology Transfers in East European Transition Economies, “Mondes en Developpement” 2002, tom 30, s.75-85. DEVLIN R., GAFTEN R. and ROWLANDS D. (1998), Rights and wrongs: A property rights perspective of Russia’s market reforms, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 43: 275-296. DURKA B. (ed.) (2000), Inwestycje zagraniczne w Polsce, Foreign Trade Institute, Warsaw. ESTRIN S. (1991), Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: The Lessons from Western Experience, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy: 159-182. ESTRIN, S. et al. (1994), Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe, London, Longman. FAHY J., HOOLEY G., COX T., BERACS J., FONFARA K. and SNOI B. (2000), The development and impact of marketing capabilities in Central Europe, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 31, No. 1: 63-81. FREUDENBERG M., LEMOINE F (1999), Les pays d’Europe Centrale et Orientale dans la division du travail en Europe, Economie Internationale. GAWLIK J. and other authors, common study, Regional Innovation Strategy for Malopolska Voivodeship 2005 – 2013, Malopolska Voivodeship Marshal Office GEULETTE A. (2000), Hongrie 1999-2000, Courrier des Pays de l’Est. GORYNIA M. (2000), Luka konkurencyjna w przedsiebiorstwach a przystapienie Polski do Unii Europejskiej (Competitive gap in enterprises vs Poland’s entry to the EU), Gospodarka Narodowa , No.10. GORYNIA M., WOLNIAK R. (2001), On the Competitiveness of a Transitional Economy: The Case of Poland, in FATEMI K. and E. KAYNAK (eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for International Business in the Shifting Global Economic Environment, Proceedings of Tenth World Business Congress, July 4-8, Zagreb, Croatia. HAUDEVILLE B., ABOITES J. (1997), La mondialisation de la technologie: aide ou frein au processus de développement ? Mondes en Développement, N°98: 51-61. HAUDEVILLE B., LEGMAN R. (2001), International Opening, Privatisation and Economic Performance: the case of Hungarian Telecoms, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines. HAUDEVILLE B. (2003), Lenteur de croissance et difficultés d’insertion des économies en transition d’Europe de l’Est et de la CEI dans l’économie mondiale, Région et Développement, n°18, 2003 (à paraître). HART P and C.S. SAUNDERS (1998), Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier’s Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 14, No. 4: 87-111. HUMBERT M. (1993), The Impact of Globalisation on Europe’s Firms and Industries, Pinter. JASINSKI A.H. (2000), Technology Transfers in Poland. A Poor State of Affairs and a Wawering Policy, Science and Public Policy, n°4. JASINSKI A.H. (2001), Polityka innowacyjna w Polsce. Wyzwania u progu XXI wieku, VII Kongres Ekonomistów Polskich (Innovation policy in Poland. Challenges of the 21st century, 7th Congress of the Polish Economists), Warszawa. KAYNAK E. (1985), Transfer of Technology from Developed to Developing Countries: Some Insight from Turkey, In SAMLI A.C. (ed.), Technology Transfers: Geographic, Economic, Cultural and Technical Dimensions, Westport CT, Quorum Books: 155-176. KEDIA B.L. & R.S. BHAGAT (1988), Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management, Academy of Management Review, 13: 559-571. KOYAMA Y. (2001), The Transition to a Market Economy in the Successor Countries of the Former Yugoslavia: Comparison between the Northern Republics and Southern Republics, The Journal of Economics of Niigata University, n°70. KUMAR B.N. (1995), Partner-selection-criteria and Success of Technology Transfer: A Model Based on Learning Theory Applied to the Case of Indo-German Technical Collaborations, Management International Review, 35 (Special Issue): 65-78. LADO A. & G. VOZIKIS (1996), Transfer of Technology to Promote Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: An Integration and Proposed Framework, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 55-72. LEONARD-BARTON D. (1992), Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13: 363-380. MANSFIELD E. (1994), Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer, Discussion paper (International Finance Corporation and, World Bank), No. 19. Washington: 1-43. NONAKA J., TAKEUCHI H. and UMEMOTO K. (1996), A Theory of organizational knowledge creation, Int. Journal of Technology Management, vol. 11, Nos. 7/9: 833-845. OCDE (1996), Politiques nationales de la science et de la technologie: Pologne. OCDE (1999), Hongrie. OLIVER C. (1991), Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, Academy of Management Review, vol. 16: 145-179. PENG M.W. & P.S. HEATH (1996), The growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice, Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 492-528. RONDINELLI D. (1998), Institutions and market development: Capacity building for economic and social transition, IPPRED working paper, N° 14, Enterprise and Cooperative Development Department, International Labour Organization, Geneva. SCHUMPETER J.A. (1934), The Theory of Capitalist Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. SOLOW R. M. (1957), Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39: 312-320. SOULSBY A. and E. CLARK (1996), The emergence of post-communist management in the Czech Republic, Organization Studies, vol. 17,: 227-247. SPENDER J. (1992), Limits to Learning from the West: How Western Management Advice May Prove Limited in Eastern Europe, UNCTAD, Transnational Corporations and World Development, London, UK: Thomson Business Press, 34(5): 389-410. STARZYK K. (1998), Wplyw bezposrednich inwestycji zagranicznych na transfer technologii do Polski, In RYMARCZYK J. BRACH J. Handel zagraniczny I inwestycje zagraniczne w latach dziewiecdziesiatych, Akadémia Economica, Wroclaw. TECZKE J., Globalizacja i regionalizacja w rozwoju współczesnych organizacji, Prace Naukowe Instytutu Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej 73, Nowe tendencje w nauce o Organizacji i Zarządzaniu 2003, str. 104-110, Konferencja w Polanicy Zdroju, 22 24 września 2003 TECZKE J., GAWLIK R., Institutional and Academic Entrepreneurship and Management and its Implications for University Governance and Management, UNESCO - CEPES Quarterly Review No.2/2004 WERESA M. A. (2001), Inwestycje zagraniczne a konkurencyjnosc polskiego eksportu, In RYMARCZYK J. SUTKOWSKI M., Internacjonalizacja I globalizacja gospodarki polskiej, Handel miedzynarodowy I inwestyucje zagraniczne, Akademia Economica, Wroclaw. WESTNEY D.E. (1988), Domestic and Foreign Learning Curves in Managing International Cooperative Strategies, In: CONTRACTOR F.J. and P. LORANGE (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books: 339-346. WITT P. (1995), The Interdependence of Technical and Social Innovations in the Transition Process of an Enterprise, In POJATINA, D. (ed.), Enterprise in Transition: 215-219. WITT P. (1996), The Management of Transformation in East German Firms, Journal of Enterprising Culture, 4(1): 57-77. WITT P. (1998), Strategies of Technical Innovation in Eastern European Firms, Management International Review, 38(2): 161-182. YOUNG S. and LAN P. (1997), Technology Transfer to China through Foreign Direct Investment, Regional Studies, vol. 31, No. 7: 669-679. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52192 |