КОРПОРАТИВНО УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ФИНАНСОВИ ПОСРЕДНИЦИ: КОНВЕРГЕНЦИЯ И ДИВЕРГЕНЦИЯ

Nedelchev, Miroslav (2012): КОРПОРАТИВНО УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ФИНАНСОВИ ПОСРЕДНИЦИ: КОНВЕРГЕНЦИЯ И ДИВЕРГЕНЦИЯ. Published in:

Abstract

The paper reviews the Corporate Governance from his evolution point of view. The used perspective is a discussion between convergence and divergence in corporate governance of financial intermediaries. The discussion is core for researches in scientific and implementation papers for last fifty years. Based on “principal-agent” model the paper illustrates both the dynamics of corporate governance and contemporary points of view for convergence and divergence of systems and practices. The functional convergence for corporate governance of financial intermediaries outruns the formal convergence. The decisions at national and international level are responds to market reality. The globalization process is leading for convergence of corporate governance, till shareholders’ ownership – for divergence. The internal corporate governance is defined by path-dependence of the company. The revealed convergence concerns ownership rights and board accountability. The external corporate governance is define by the globalization. The auditors convergence their practices for transparency to shareholders and investors. The regulators are convergent by requirements of stock exchanges.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES: CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE
• Language: Bulgarian
• Keywords: corporate governance, financial intermediaries
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance

References

Abdesselam, R., S. Cieply, A.-L. Le Nadant. Transfers of Ownership Rights: An Empirical Study of Five European Countries. Brussels Economic Review, Vol. 51, № 4, Winter, 2008, pp. 413-434.

Aguilera, R., A. Cuervo-Cazurra. Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger? Organization Studies, № 25, 2004, pp. 415–443.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Principles for home-host supervisory cooperation and allocation mechanisms in the context of Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA). November 2007.

Bebchuk, L., M. Roe. A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, 1999, pp. 127-170.

Berglöf, E. Corporate Governance Reform - Redirecting the European Agenda. Economic Policy, April, 24, 1997, pp. 91-124.

Berglöf, E., A. Pajuste. Corporate Governance in Central and Eastern Europe. in P. Cornelius, B. Kogut. Global Competitiveness and Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press. 2003.

Bratton, W., J. McCahery. The Case Against Global Cross Reference. in: McCahery J., P. Moerland, T. Raaijmakers, L. Renneboog (eds.). Corporate Governance Regimes - Convergence and Diversity. Oxford University Press. 2002.

Challenging board performance. European Corporate Governance Report 2011. Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. 2011.

Coffee, J. The future as history: the prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Columbia University School of Law, Working paper 144, 1998.

Collier, P., M. Zaman. Convergence in European Governance Codes: The Audit Committee Concept. Blackwell Journal: Corporate Governance: an international review, Nov-2005, 13 (6), pp. 753-768.

Dewing, I., P. Russell. Accounting, Auditing and Corporate Governance of European Listed Countries: EU Policy Developments Before and After Enron. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (2), 2004, pp. 289-319.

Earle, J., S. Estrin. Privatization, Competition, and Budget Constraints: Disciplining Enterprises in Russia. Economics of planning, 36 (1), 1998, pp. 1-22.

European Commission. Financial Services: Implementing the Framework for Financial Markets: Action Plan. Communication from the Commission COM (1999), 1999.

European Commission Looks to Improve Corporate Governance. 2011.

Financial Reporting Council. Effective Corporate Governance. 2011.

Geroski, P., K. Gugler. Corporate Growth Convergence in Europe. Oxford Economic Papers, Volume 56, 2004, pp. 597-620.

Gerschenkron, A. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Harvard University Press. Cambridge Mass. 1962.

Gilson, R. Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function. Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper № 192, May 2000.

Gordon, J., M. Roe. Convergence and persistence in corporate governance. Cambridge University Press. 2004.

Gregory, H. Comparing Corporate Governance Principles & Guidelines. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, 2012.

Hansmann, H., R. Kraakman. The end of history for corporate law? Yale Law School Working Paper № 235, 2000.

Hölzl, W. Convergence of financial systems: towards an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics. Volume 2, 2006, pp. 67-90.

Khanna, T. Globalisation and Convergence in Corporate Governance. Harvard Business School, November 2001.

Klapper, L., L. Laeven, I. Love. What drives corporate governance? Firm-level evidence from Eastern Europe. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3600, World Bank. 2005.

Levine, R. Financial development an economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1997, pp. 688-726.

Lütz, S., D. Eberle, D. Lauter. Varieties of private self-regulation in European capitalism: corporate governance codes in the UK and Germany. Socio-Economic Review, Volume 9, Number 2, 2011 , pp. 315-338.

McRitchie, J. Governance After the Financial Crisis. 2011.

Mullineux, A. Financial Sector Convergence and Corporate Governance. An European Perspective. Springer, 2002.

Nestor, S., J. Thompson. Corporate Governance Patterns in OECD Economies: Is Convergence Underway? OECD, Paris, 2000.

Private Sector Taskforce of Regulated Professions and Industries. Regulatory Convergence in Financial Professions and Industries. Final Report to G-20 Deputies. 2011.

Financial Reporting Council. Riskmetrics study commissioned by the EU commission: Study on monitoring and enforcement practices in corporate governance in the Member States. 2009.

Roe, M. Corporate Law's Limits. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(2), 2002, pp. 233-271.

Schaede, U. Toward a New System of Corporate Governance in the European Union: An Integrative Model of the Anglo-American and Germanic Systems. European and Transatlantic Studies, 1995, pp. 93-119.

Scharpf, F. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic. Oxford University Press. 1999.

Siems, M. Convergence in Shareholder Law. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Stacey, K., K. Lehn. Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance Structure, and Survival. American Economic Review Papers and Proc., 87, 1997, pp. 421-425.

Thomsen, S. Convergence of Corporate Governance Systems to European and Anglo-American Standards. European Business Organization Law Review, 4, 2003(1), pp. 31-50.

Walker, D. Walker Review of Corporate Governance of UK Banking Industry. 2009.

Willemain, J. Corporate reporting: Trends and tensions in convergence. Deloitte, 2008.

Wójcik, D. Convergence in corporate governance: evidence from Europe and the challenge for economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 2006, pp. 639-659.

Wymeersch, E. Convergence or Divergence in Corporate Governance Patterns in Western Europe? In McCahery, J., P. Moerland, T. Raaijmakers, L. Renneborg, (eds.). Corporate Governance Regimes: Convergence and Diversity, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 230–250.