Determinants of profitability of Polish rural micro-enterprises

Janda, Karel and Strielkowski, Wadim and Rausser, Gordon (2013): Determinants of profitability of Polish rural micro-enterprises.

Abstract

Rural micro-enterprises are an important factor in sustainable rural development in post-transitional Eastern Europe. This paper deals with determining the key factors influencing profitability in rural micro-enterprises in Poland. The research design was based on a questionnaire survey of 300 rural micro-enterprises in food-processing sector in rich and poor Polish provinces. The analysis carried out in this study is centered around the Polish EU accession in May 2004. Similar to other related studies, our results show that EU accession was not perceived as a major change by rural Polish micro-entrepreneurs and that the EU related factors were not significant determinants of their profitability. However, our results also show that the success of the rural food processing micro-enterprise in Eastern Europe is most related to its owner/manager and enterprise characteristics. For owner/manager the most significant determinants are his/her age and risk-taking as the main motive for establishing an enterprise. The enterprise characteristics that determine the profitability include enterprise location within a region with competitive situation, enterprise size (being a sole trader or family enterprise), ICT advancements in enterprise and the fact whether enterprise has any certificates for its products. The results have significant implications for the researches and policy-makers and can become a basis for preparing relevant enterprise support policies in post-transitional Eastern Europe.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: micro-enterprises, rural development, transition economies, EU Accession, linear regression model
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P25 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q10 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

 Adekunle, B. (2011): Determinants of microenterprise performance in Nigeria. International Small Business Journal, 29(4):360-373

 Anim-Somuah, H. (2011): Determinants of Micro and Small Enterprise Performance: The Agri-Food Sector of Ghana. PhD dissertation, University of Guelph.

 De Mel, S., McKenzie, D.J. and Woodrufi, C. (2009): Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1):19-31.

 De Mel, S., McKenzie, D.J. and Woodrufi, C.(2008): Returns to capital in microenterprises: Evidence from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4):1329-1372.

 European Commission (2003): Observatory of European SMEs 2003. Report No. 8, Highlights from the 2003 Observatory. Brussels, Belgium.

 European Commission (2004a): Observatory of European SMEs 2003: Report No. 5 SMEs and co-operation. Brussels, Belgium.

 European Commission (2004b): Observatory of European SMEs 2003. Report No. 7, SMEs in Europe 2003. Brussels, Belgium.

 Falkowski, J., Jakubowski, M. and Strawinski, P. (2011): Returns from income strategies in rural Poland. Working Paper 5/2011, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

 Gillet, S., Lehr, W (1999): The availability of Broadband Internet access: empirical evidence, Paper presented at 27th Annual Technical Research Conference, Alexandria, Egypt.

 Kadocsa, G. and Francsovics, A. (2011): Macro and micro economic factors of small enterprise competitiveness. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 8(1):23-40.

 Lars Ivar Oppedal Berge, Bjorvatn, K. and Tungodden, B. (2011): Human and financial capital for microenterprise development: Evidence from a field and lab experiment. Working Paper 1/2011, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

 Mano, Y., Iddrisu, A. Yoshino, Y. and Sonobe, T. How can micro and small enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa become more productive? The impacts of experimental basic managerial training. World Development, Forthcoming.

 Mark, J., Munoz, S. (2010): Contemporary Microenterprise: Concepts and Cases. Edward Elgar

 Mmbengwa, V. M., Ramukumba, T. , Groenewald, J. A. van Schalkwyk, H. D. Gundidza, M. B. and Maiwashe, A. N. (2011): Evaluation of essential capacities required for the performance of farming small, micro and medium enterprise (SMEs) in South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(6):1500-1507.

 Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (2003): Raport o stanie sektora MSP w Polsce w latach 2001-2002. Polish Agency for Entertprise Development, Warsaw, Poland.

 Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (2006): Stan sektora MSP w 2004 roku. Tendencje rozwojowe w latach 1994-2004. Polish Agency for Entertprise Development, Warsaw, Poland.

 Rankhumise, E.M. and Rugimbana, R.O. (2010): Micro enterprise owner perspectives on performance: Insights from selected municipalities in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 4(16):3500-3507.

 Schreiner, M. and Woller, G. (2003): Microenterprise development programs in the United States and in the developing world. World Development, 31(9):1567-1580.

 Zolnierski, A. (2005): Innowacyjność polskich mikro przedsiębiorstw, Raport dla PARP, Polish Agency for Entertprise Development, Warsaw, Poland.