Khemraj, Tarron (2007): Monetary policy and excess liquidity: the case of Guyana. Published in: Social and Economic Studies , Vol. 56, No. 3 (December 2007): pp. 101-127.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53126.pdf Download (432kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the monetary policy framework of Guyana. Guyana’s monetary Policy is motivated by the IMF’s financial programming model. The quantity of excess reserves in the banking system is seen as critical in determining bank credit and ultimately the external balance and inflationary pressures. Therefore, the central bank is always willing to mop up excess liquidity by selling Treasury bills. The paper examines the potential sources of persistent excess reserves. It then tests using the VAR methodology whether excess reserves exert the postulated effect on the price level and exchange rate.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Monetary policy and excess liquidity: the case of Guyana |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | excess liquidity, financial programming, monetary policy, Guyana |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers |
Item ID: | 53126 |
Depositing User: | Tarron Khemraj |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2014 03:04 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 18:53 |
References: | Agenor, P., J. Aizenman, and A. Hoffmaister (2004). “The credit crunch in East Asia: what can bank excess liquid assets tell us?” Journal of International Money and Finance, 23: 27-49. Alexander, W., Balino, T., Enoch, C. and others (1995). The adoption of indirect instruments of monetary policy, IMF Occasional Paper 126, International Monetary Fund. Baltensperger, E. (1980). “Alternative approaches to the theory of the banking firm.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 6: 1-37. Baltensperger, E. (1974). “The precautionary demand for reserves.” American Economic Review, 64 (1): 205-210. BoG (various years). Annual Report. Bank of Guyana: Georgetown. Caprio, G. and P. Honohan (1993). “Excess liquidity and monetary overhangs.” World Development, 21 (4): 523-533. Cleveland, W. (1979). “Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74 (368): 829-836. Cleveland, W. and S. Devlin (1988). “Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (403): 596-510. Das, U. and G. Ganga (1997). “A retrospect and prospect on the reform of the financial sector in Guyana.” Social and Economic Studies, 46 (2&3): 93-129. Egoume-Bossogo, P., E. Faal, R. Nallari, and E. Weisman (2003). Guyana: Experience with Macroeconomic Stabilization, Structural Adjustment, and Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Frost, P. (1971). “Banks’ demand for excess reserves.” Journal of Political Economy, 79 (4): 805-825. Ganga, G. (2000). “Credit, excess liquidity and monetary policy issues in Guyana.” Social and Economic Studies, 49 (2&3): 199-224. Ganga, G. (1998). “Stabilisation and financial adjustment in Guyana.” Money Affairs, 11 (2): 147-168. Goodhart, C. (2002). “The endogeneity of money.” In P. Aristis, M. Desai and S. Dow (eds.), Money, Macroeconomics and Keynes: Essays in the Honour of Victoria Chick. London: Routledge. Guttentag, J. (1966). “The strategy of open market operations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (1): 1-30. IMF (2000). Financial Programming and Policy: The Case of Turkey. Washington, DC: IMF Institute, International Monetary Fund. IMF (1987). “Theoretical Aspects of the Design of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs.” Occasional Paper No. 55, International Monetary Fund. Khemraj, T. (2006a). “The monetary policy framework of Guyana: experiences, lessons, and consequences.” Savings and Development, XXX (2): 329-350. Khemraj, T. (2006b). “Fiscal sustainability and foreign dependency: the case of Guyana.” Transition, Issue 34: 72-85. Khemraj, T. (2006c). Excess liquidity, oligopoly banking, and monetary policy in a small open economy. PhD Dissertation, New York: New School for Social Research. Lavoie, M. (1984). “The endogenous flow of credit and the Post Keynesian theory of money.” Journal of Economic Issues, XVIII (3): 771-797. Lombra, R. and R. Torto (1973). “Federal reserve defensive behaviour and the reverse causation argument.” Southern Economic Journal, 40 (1): 47-55. Morrison, G. (1966). Liquidity Preference of Commercial Banks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Orr, D. and W. Mellon (1961). “Stochastic reserve losses and expansion of bank credit.” American Economic Review, 51 (4): 614-623. Pesaran, M. H. and Y. Shin (1998). “Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models.” Economics Letters, 58: 17-29. Polak, J. (1997). “The IMF model at forty.” Working Paper 97/49, International Monetary Fund. Sims, C. (1980). “Macroeconomics and reality.” Econometrica, 48: 1-48. Singh, S. (1997). Bank of Guyana: Reserve Money Programming Manual. Georgetown: Bank of Guyana. Stiglitz, J. and B. Greenwald (2003). Towards a New Paradigm in Monetary Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saxegaard, M. (2006). “Excess liquidity and the effectiveness of monetary policy: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.” Working Paper 06/115, International Monetary Fund. Tarp, F. (1993). Stabilization and Structural Adjustment: Macroeconomic Frameworks for Analyzing the Crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: Routledge. Wang, P. and P. Dune (2003). “Real exchange rate fluctuations in East Asia: generalized impulse response analysis.” Asian Economic Journal, 17 (2): 185-202. Watson, P. (2003). “Evaluating monetary policy measures in a small primary-exporting economy.” Social and Economic Studies, 52 (3): 143-165. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53126 |