Farrell, Niall and Lyons, Seán (2014): The distributional impact of the Irish public service obligation levy on electricity consumption.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53488.pdf Download (893kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We analyse the distributional impact of financing energy and environmental policies through additional charges on electricity consumption, focussing on the impact Ireland’s flat-rate Public Service Obligation (PSO) levy has on domestic consumers. Switching Ireland’s flate-rate charge to a unit-based charge results in reduced regressivity across the entire income distribution. A unit-based scheme reduces aggregate burden for most households on low incomes. Regressive impacts are greater for a subset of heavy electricity users. Incremental block pricing (IBP) exaggerates these effects. A hybrid fixed/variable structure mitigates regressivity for high users but lessens overall regressivity reduction. Redistribution via Ireland’s Household Benefits Package is sub-optimal relative to a hypothetical equivalised income-based scheme. Net of ‘merit order’ savings, flat charges redistribute burden incidence from rich to poor whilst fixed per-unit charges have a neutral effect. IBP shifts cost to heavy users, predominantly large households. IBP results in a negative net burden for the majority of households across all income groups.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The distributional impact of the Irish public service obligation levy on electricity consumption |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Renewable Energy Support Schemes; Distributional Impact; Policy Cost |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H22 - Incidence H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 53488 |
Depositing User: | Dr Niall Farrell |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2014 14:42 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 04:24 |
References: | BEE (2013). “The EEG Surcharge for 2014: Background Paper on Components of the Surcharge, Development and Expected Level.” Accessed 4 February, 2014. http://www.bee-ev.de/_downloads/publikationen/positionen/2013/20130904_EEG-Surcharge-2014_Background-Paper.pdf Borenstein, S. (2012). “The redistributional impact of nonlinear electricity pricing.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(3): 56–90. Borenstein, S. and L.W. Davis (2012). “The equity and efficiency of two-part tariffs in US natural gas markets.” Journal of Law and Economics 55(1): 75 – 128. Bryant, C. (2013). “Soaring renewable energy costs set to stoke german energy debate.” Financial Times, October 15 Central Statistics Office (CSO) (2012). Household budget survey 2009/2010 volume 2. Dublin: Stationery Office. . Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2008). “Public service obligation levy 2008/2009.” Decision Paper CER/08/129. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2009). “Public service obligation levy 2009/2010.” Decision Paper CER/09/119. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2010a). “Public service obligation levy 2010/2011.” Decision Paper CER/10/131. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2010b). “Review of the regulatory framework for the retail electricity market competition review Q1 2010.” Information Note CER/10/059. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2011a). “Public service obligation levy 2011/2012.” Decision Paper CER/11/130. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2011b). “Review of the regulatory framework for the retail electricity market competition review Q4 2010.” Information Note CER/11/021. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2012a). “Electricity & gas retail markets annual report 2011.” Information Note CER/12/072. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2012b). “Public service obligation levy 2012/2013.” Decision Paper CER/12/121. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) (2013). “Public service obligation levy 2013/2014.” Decision Paper CER/13/168. Dublin: Commission for Energy Regulation. Chawla, M. and M. G. Pollitt (2013). “Energy-efficiency and environmental policies & income supplements in the UK: evolution and distributional impacts on domestic energy bills.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 2(1): 21-40. Clifford, E. and M. Clancy (2011). Impact of wind generation on wholesale electricity costs in 2011. SEAI and Eirgrid Technical report. Dublin: SEAI and Eirgrid. Department of Social Protection (2013). “Internal guidelines used in administering schemes comprising the household benefits package.” Accessed February 3, 2014. http://www.welfare.ie/en/Pages/Household-Benefits-Package.aspx Devitt, C. and L. Malaguzzi Valeri (2011). “The effect of refit on irish wholesale electricity prices.” The Economic and Social Review 42(3): 343-369. Doherty, R. and M. O’Malley (2011). “The efficiency of Ireland’s Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariff (REFIT) for wind generation.” Energy Policy 39(9): 4911–4919. DW (2013). “German energy transition caught in subsidies’ trap.” Accessed February 3, 2014. http://www.dw.de/german-energy-transition-caught-in-subsidies-trap/a-17066849 ESB (2009). “ESB Customer Supply Regulated Tariffs for Tariff Period 1st October 2009 to 30th September 2010.” Accessed February 5, 2014. http://www.cer.ie/docs/000018/cer09156.pdf. E.U. (2008). EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 125/06/COL of 3 May 2006 regarding the Norwegian Energy Fund (Norway), 2008 O.J. (L 189) 36. Eurostat (2014). “Electricity prices for domestic consumers, from 2007 onwards - bi-annual data.” Accessed February 4, 2014. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Electricity_and_natural_gas_price_statistics#Electricity_prices_for_household_consumers Grösche, P. and C. Schröder (2011). “On the redistributive effects of Germany’s feed-in tariff.” Empirical Economics: 1–45. Krozer, Y. (2013). “Cost and benefit of renewable energy in the European Union.” Renewable Energy 50: 68–73. Loreck, C., F.C. Matthes, H. Hermann, F. Jung, L. Emele, V. Cook (2012) “Short analysis of the increase of the German EEG surcharge for 2013.” Berlin: Öko-Institut e.V. Mirza, F.M. and O. Bergland (2012). “Pass-through of wholesale price to the end user retail price in the Norwegian electricity market”, Energy Economics 34(6): 2003-2012 Neuhoff, K., S. Bach, J. Diekmann, M. Beznoska, and T. El-Laboudy (2013). “Distributional effects of energy transition: Impacts of renewable electricity support in Germany.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 2(1): 41-54. Patel, S. (2013). “Germany raises renewables levy by 20%.” Accessed 3 February, 2014. http://www.powermag.com/germany-raises-renewables-levy-by-20/ Sensfuß, F., M. Ragwitz, and M. Genoese (2008). “The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany.” Energy Policy 36(8): 3086–3094. Von der Fehr, N. and Hansen, P.V. (2010) “Electricity Retailing in Norway.” The Energy Journal 31(1):25-45 Verde, S. and M. Pazienza (2013). “Cost recovery of res-e support in Italy: a new case for a carbon tax.” EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2013/72. Florence: European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Climate Policy Research Unit. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53488 |