durongkaveroj, wannaphong (2014): SAM Multiplier and its Application to Total Poverty Gap.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53988.pdf Download (129kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to present an application of SAM multiplier to Total Poverty Gap using simulation and speculation method. Also, an appropriate trade policy was derived in each region aimed at reducing poverty. The results revealed that income level and exogenous macroeconomic shock were an important factor in getting the poor out of destitution. Moreover, to reduce poverty, meat sector should be strongly supported to be exported commodity in North America, Latin America, and EU25. Additionally, processed food sector should be encouraged in Oceania, Southeast Asia, and South Asia. Light manufacturing products should be promoted in East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. And Middle East and North Africa can reduce its poverty through an increase in heavy manufacturing sector
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | SAM Multiplier and its Application to Total Poverty Gap |
English Title: | SAM Multiplier and its Application to Total Poverty Gap |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | sam multiplier, multiplier, poverty, total poverty gap |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O24 - Trade Policy ; Factor Movement Policy ; Foreign Exchange Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries |
Item ID: | 53988 |
Depositing User: | Users 21019 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 27 Feb 2014 14:55 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 01:34 |
References: | Civardi, M. B. & Lenti R. T. 2006. Multiplier Decomposition, Inequality and Poverty In SAM Framework. Working Paper No. 482: University of Pavia. Essama-Nssah, B. 2005. Simulating the Poverty Impacts of Macroeconomic Shocks and Policies. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3788. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Kalwij, A.S. & Verschoor, A. 2004. How Good is Growth for the Poor? The Role of the Initial Income Distribution in Regional Diversity in Poverty Trends (Discussion Paper No. 2004-115). Center of Economic Research: Tilburg University. Klan, H. A. 1999. Sectoral Growth and Poverty Alleviation: A Multiplier Decomposition Technique Applied to South Africa. World Development, 27(3): pp. 521-530. Perrotta, M. 2007. Constitutoins ad the Growth-Elasticity of Poverty. Stockholm: Stockholm University. Pyatt,G. & Round, J. I. 1979. Accounting and Fixed Multipliers in a Social Account Matrix Framework. The Economic Journal, 89(356): pp. 850-873. Ravallion, M. & Chen, S. 1996. What can New Survey Data Tell us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Ravallion, M. & Chen, S. 2008. The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, but no less Successful in the Fight against Poverty. Washington, D.C.: The World bank. Round, J. 2003. Social Accounting Matrices and SAM-based Multiplier Analysis. In: F. Bourguignon & L. Pereira da Silva. 2003. The Impact of Economics Policies on Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools: pp. 301-324. Sen, A. K. 1976. Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica, 44(2):pp. 219-231. Squire, L. 1993. Fighting Poverty. The American Economic Review, 83(2): pp. 377-382. Takeda, Y. 2009. Economic Growth and its Effect on Poverty Reduction in Russia. Tokyo: Hitotsubashi University. Thaiprasert, N. 2006. Rethinking the Role of Agriculture and Agro-Industry in the Economic Development of Thailand: Input-Output and CGE Analyses (Ph.D. Dissertation). Nagoya University, Nagoya. Thorbecke, E. & Jung, H. 1996. A Multiplier Decomposition Method to Analyze Poverty Alleviation. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2): pp. 279-300. Yarbrough, B. V. & Yarbrough, R. M. 2006. The World Economy Trade and Finance. 7th ed. Connecticut: Thomson. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53988 |