Mathematical Psychics and Hydraulics: The Methodological Influence of Edgeworth and Fisher

Drakopoulos, Stavros A. (2014): Mathematical Psychics and Hydraulics: The Methodological Influence of Edgeworth and Fisher.

Abstract

The scientific methodology of classical physics has been a constant influence in the development of orthodox economics. Clear signs of this can be found in the works of many classical economists such as Smith, Say, Cairnes and Mill. The physics influence became more apparent with the emergence of marginalism. The economic thought of F. Y. Edgeworth, however, is the peak of the influence of classical physics to economics. In Edgeworth’s Mathematical Psychics, the identification of maximum energy in physics with that of the maximum pleasure in economic calculus, is central in his thought. In the same manner, I. Fisher, the founder of marginalism in the US, promoted a classical physics based economic methodology. The close analogy of physics and economics concepts and the application of tools from hydrodynamics to economic theory, are basic characteristics of his work. These views eventually dominated orthodox economic methodology. The paper argues that, apart from establishing the physics scientific ideal in economics, both of these authors provided the methodological justification for its adoption in economics. It also examines their subsequent influence on the formation of the current methodological approach in orthodox economics. In particular, it discusses their influence on key components of current mainstream economics such as: extensive use of mathematics, aversion to methodological discourse and anti-psychologism.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Edgeworth; Fisher; economic method; marginalism
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology

References

Baccini, B. (2007) Edgeworth on the foundations of ethics and probability, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14 (1): 79-96

Backhouse, R. (2010) Methodology in action, Journal of Economic Methodology, 17(1): 3-15.

Beed, C. and Kane, O. (1991) What is the critique of the mathematization of economics?, Kyklos, 44: 581-612.

Breslau, D. (2003) Economics invents the economy: mathematics, statistics, and models in the work of Irving Fisher and Wesley Mitchell, Theory and Society 32: 379-411.

Bruni, L. and Guala, F (2001) Vilfredo Pareto and the epistemological foundations of choice theory, History of Political Economy, 33: 21-49.

Cairnes, J. (1875) The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.

Caldwell, B. (1993) Economic methodology: rationale, foundations, prospects, in U. Maki, B. Gustafsson and C. Knudsen (eds) Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 45- 60.

Creedy, J. (1980) Some recent interpretations of Mathematical Psychics. History of Political Economy 12(2):267-76.

Davenport, H., Hamilton, W., Ely, R., Fisher, I. and Anderson, B. (1916) Tendencies in Economic Theory—Discussion”, The American Economic Review, vol.6, No.1: 62-169.

Debreu, G. (1991) The mathematization of economic theory, American Economic Review, 81(1): 1-7.

Dow, S. (2002) Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dow, S. (2012) Foundations for New Economic Thinking: a Collection of Essays, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Drakopoulos, S. A. (1994) Some implications of the new physics for economic methodology, South African Journal of Economics, 62(4): 198-209.

Drakopoulos, S. A. (1997) Origins and development of the trend towards value-free economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19: 286-300.

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1877) New and Old Methods of Ethics or “Physical Ethics” and "Methods of Ethics”. Oxford: James Parker and Co. Also in Newman (ed.) (2003).

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay of the Application of Mathematics to Moral Sciences, London: Kegan Pau.l

Edgeworth, F. Y (1885) Methods of statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Jubilee volume:181–217.

Edgeworth, F.Y. (1887) Observations and Statistics: An essay on the Theory of Errors of Observation and the first Principles of Statistics (read 25 May 1885), Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, XIV(II):138–69.

Edgeworth F. Y (1893) Review of Fisher's Mathematical Investigations, The Economic Journal, 3(9): 108-112.

Fisher, I. (1892) [1965] Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Fisher, I. (1911) The Purchasing Power of Money: Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest and Crises, NewYork: Macmillan.

Fisher, I. (1930) The Theory of Interest, as Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest it, NewYork: Macmillan.

Fisher, I. (1932) Statistics in the service of economics, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 28, no. 181.

Friedman, M. (1953) The methodology of positive economics, in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hahn, F. (1992) Reflections, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, No. 77, April.

Hicks, J. (1939) Value and Capital, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hoover, K. (1995) Why does methodology matter for economics?, Economic Journal, 105: 715-734.

Jevons, W. S. (1871) The Theory of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.

Lawson, T. ( I 994) Why are so many economists opposed to methodology ? Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (I):105-34.

Lewin, S. (1996) Economics and psychology: lessons for our own day from the early Twentieth Century, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIV:1293-1323.

McLure M. (2010) Pareto, Pigou and Third-party Consumption: Divergent approaches to welfare theory with implications for the study of public finance, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17: 635-57

Mill, J. S. (1874) Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Oyer.

Mirowski, P. (1984) Physics and the ‘marginalist revolution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8: 361-379.

Mirowski, P. (1989) More heat than light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Mirowski, P. (1994) Marshalling the unruly atoms: Understanding Edgeworth’s career. In Edgeworth on Chance, Economic Hazard and Statistics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Morgenstern, Oskar (1976) Collaborating with von Neumann, Journal of Economic Literature 14 (3): 850-16.

Newman, P. (1987) Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. II. London: MacMillan, pp. 84 – 98.

Pareto, V. (1971) [1907] Manual of Political Economy, (transl. by A. Schwier), London: MacMillan.

Rabbin, M. (2002) A perspective on psychology and economics, European Economic Review, 46(4): 657-685.

Rashid, S. (1994) “John von Neumann, Scientific Method and Empirical Economics”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 1(2): 279-294.

Samuelson, P. (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior, Economica, 5: 61-71.

Samuelson, P. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Samuelson, P. (1998) How Foundations came to be, Journal of Economic Literature 36:1375–1386.

Say, J.B. (1803) Treatise on Political Economy, English edition, New York: A. M. Kelley (1964).

Seligman, B. (1969) The impact of positivism on economic thought, History of Political Economy, 1: 256-78.

Smith, A. (1980 ed) Essays on Philosophical Subjects , edited by Wightman, W. P. D., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Tobin, J. (1985) Neoclassical theory in America: J. B. Clark and Fisher, American Economic Review, 75(6): 28-38.

Tobin, J. (1987) Fisher, Irwin In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. II. London: MacMillan, pp. 369-276.

Turk, M. (2012) The mathematical turn in economics: Walras, the French mathematicians, and the road not taken, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34 (2): 149-167.

von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wade Hands, D. (2001) Economic methodology is dead - long live economic methodology: thirteen theses on the new economic methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology, 8 (1): 49-63.

Walras, L. (1871)[1965) Elements of Pure Economics, transl. by W. Jaffe, London: Allen and Unwin.

Wong, S. (1978) The Foundations of Paul Samuelson’s Revealed Preference Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Zouboulakis, M. (2003) L’ équation des échanges de Fisher et la loi de Boyle. Les limites de l’analogie physique en économie, Économies et Societés, 33(12) : 2191-2206.