F. Akpan, Usenobong and E. Abang, Dominic (2014): Environmental Quality and Economic Growth: A Panel Analysis of the "U" in Kuznets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54461.pdf Download (228kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The primary motivation behind this study was to search for evidence of the link between environmental quality and economic growth so as to answer the relevant question of whether economic growth alone could serve as a long-run solution to environmental damage as implied by EKC hypothesis. Here we analyze the relationship using a panel of 47 countries over the period 1970 -2008. Using Random-effect estimation and two-stage least square, our results leads to the following conclusions: relying on a quadratic model can easily mislead researchers to ratify the existence of EKC; the EKC hypothesis ceased to hold whenever an alternative functional form (cubic) is employed. At best, the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality is shown to be typified by an N-shaped curve. The paper maintained that simply waiting for an automatic arrival of a delinking point for environmental damage given long-run growth will not be a feasible solution to environmental quality. A number of feasible policy menu and critical questions to guide selection of the best instrument capable of bringing about a downturn in environmental damage have been suggested in the paper.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Environmental Quality and Economic Growth: A Panel Analysis of the "U" in Kuznets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Economic growth, EKC hypothesis, Environmental quality, delinking |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C26 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 54461 |
Depositing User: | Usenobong F. Akpan |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2014 14:54 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:14 |
References: | Agras, J. and Chapman, D., 1999. A Dynamic Approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28:267-277. Akpan, G. E. and Akpan, U. F., 2012. Electricity Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(4): 292-306 Akpan, U. F. and Ekong, C. N., 2013. What are the Growth Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in WAMZ? European Journal of Business and Management, 5(17): 134-145 Akpan, U.F. and Chuku, C.A., 2011. Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation in Nigeria: Beyond the Environmental Kuznets Curve. In: A. Adinikinju, A. Iwayemiand W. Iledare (Eds), Green Energy and Energy Security: Options for Africa, 2011 NAEE Proceedings, Pp. 212-234. Beckerman, W., 1992. Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment? World Development. 20(4): 481-496 Bhattacharyya, S. C., 2011. Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets and Governance. New York: Springer-Verlag London Limited Breitung, J., 2002. Nonparametric tests for Unit Roots and Cointegration. Journal of Econometrics, 108(2), 343–363. Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D. and Kahn, J. R., 2009. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: a Comprehensive Analysis of the EKC and Environmental Degradation. Ecological Economics, 1149-1159. Choi, I. , 2001. “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 20: 249–272. Cole, M.A., 2004. US Environmental Load Displacement: Examining Consumption, Regulations and the Role of NAFTA. Ecological Economics, 48(4): 439-450. De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J. C., and Opschoor, J. B., 1998. Economic Growth and Emissions: Reconsidering the Empirical Basis of Environmental Kuznets Curves. Ecological Economics, 25:161-175 Friedl, B. and Getzner, M., 2003. Determinants of CO2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy. Ecological Economics, 45:133-148 Galeotti, M. and Lanza, A., 1999. Desperately Seeking (Environmental) Kuznets. 1998 World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics, P.46, Venice, 25-27 June Grossman, G. and Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: NBER. Grossman, G. and Krueger, A., 1995. Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), 352–377. Gujarati, D. and Porter, 2009. Basic Econometrics . McGraw Hill Publishers, New York He, L. and Richard, P., 2010. Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics, 69: 1083-1093 Heil, M. T. and Selden, T. M., 2001. Carbon Emissions and Economic Development: Future Trajectories based on Historical Experience. Environment and Development Economics, 6(1): 63-83 Holtz-Eakin, D. and Selden, T.M., 1995. Stoking the Fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57: 85-101 IAE, 2013. World Energy Outlook 2013, available at http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/resources/energydevelopment/energyaccessprojectionsto2030/ Im, K., Pesaran, M., and Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. Levin, A., Lin, C.F. and Chu, C. S. J., 2002. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1 – 24 Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu, 1999. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631–52. Matinez-Zerzoso, I. and Bengochea-Morancho, A., 2004. Pooled Mean Group Estimation for an Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2. Economic Letters, 82: 121-126 Munasinghe, M., 1999. Is Environmental Degradation an Inevitable Consequence of Economic Growth: Turning Through the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 29: 89-109 Panayotou, T., 1993. Empirical tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at different stages of Economic Development. Geneva: International Labor Office, Technology and Employment Programme Panayotou, T., 1994. Economic Instruments for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. UNEP Paper 16, UNEP, Nairobi Pedroni, P., 2004. Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54461 |