Porto Marghera and the Industrial Ecology Challenge: Why it did not become an Eco-Industrial Park

Mannino, Ilda and Ninka, Eniel and Turvani, Margherita (2014): Porto Marghera and the Industrial Ecology Challenge: Why it did not become an Eco-Industrial Park.

Abstract

A set of factors facilitate the role of Eco-Industrial Parks in addressing the many environmental challenges arising with economic development: among such factors the local context in which the EIP is embedded, i.e. the cohesion of the community, the cooperation among actors, the proximity and the adaptability, as well as the global context and economic phase play a major role. EIPs’ evolution process is path-dependent, hence also history and choices made in the past as well as the context of the industrial sector are very important in determining their success. We study the industrial area of Venice, namely Porto Marghera, as a showcase, in order to understand how history can twist the evolution of an industrial area and determine its destiny. The analysis covers Industrial Symbiosis leverage factors, as well as the local, national and international context drivers that, over time, promoted or hindered the development and evolution of the area. We show how, due to the action of such multiple factors, such large and major Italian industrial area presenting just few years ago characteristics that could have favoured its development as an EIP, resulted eventually in a failure and the closing down of the most relevant economic activities supporting the functioning of the EIP itself. Context factors and single specific shocks, related to local issues as well as to the global, regional, and national scale, shifted the evolutionary path of a well-integrated EIP, even though the technical and internal characteristics of the industrial area were in place.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Industrial Symbiosis, Eco-industrial Park, Chemistry sector, Italy
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L23 - Organization of Production; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L61 - Metals and Metal Products ; Cement ; Glass ; Ceramics; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L65 - Chemicals ; Rubber ; Drugs ; Biotechnology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

Becchi A., 2009. Rapporto intermedio aprile 2009, F – Individuazione delle possibili diverse modalità di uso della laguna, F2 – industrie ubicate a Porto Marghera, Unità Operativa ECON.

Chertow M.R., 1999. The Eco-Industrial Park Model Reconsidered, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (3), pp. 8-10.

Chertow M.R., 2000. Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, pp. 313-337.

Chertow M.R., 2003. Evaluating the Success of Eco-Industrial Development. in E. Cohen-Rosenthal, J. Musnikow, (Eds.), Eco-Industrial Strategies: Unleashing Synergy Between Economic Development and the Environment, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.

Chertow M.R., 2004. Industrial Symbiosis, Encyclopaedia of Energy, 3, pp. 407-15.

Chertow M.R., 2005. Dynamics of Geographically Based Industrial Ecosystems, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

Co.S.E.S., 2004. Porto Marghera - Trasformazione e Prospettive, seconda conferenza economica provinciale, Provincia di Venezia - Assessorato Attività Produttive, Ed. Favaretto P.

Coˆte´ R.P., Cohen-Rosenthal E., 1998. Designing Eco-Industrial Parks: A Synthesis of Some Experiences, Journal of Cleaner Production 6, pp. 181-8.

Coˆte´ R.P., Hall J., 1995. Industrial parks as ecosystems, Cleaner Production, 3 (1-2), pp. 41-46.

Coˆte´ R.P., Smolenaars T., 1997. Supporting Pillars for Industrial Ecosystems, Journal of Cleaner Production 5 (1-2), pp. 67-74.

Da Ronch B., De Pietro L., Mannino I., Mattiuzzo E., 2009. La gestione del rischio industriale tra impresa e territorio. L’esperienza di Porto Marghera, in Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia, Roma, XXII, 2 2009.

Desrochers P., 2002. Industrial Ecology and the Rediscovery of Inter-Firm Recycling Linkages: Historical Evidence and Policy Implications, Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (5), pp. 1031-57.

Ehrenfield J.R., Chertow M.R., 2002. Industrial Symbiosis: The Legacy of Kalundborg, in A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, R.U. and Ayres L.W., Eds. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Espinosa C., 2005. Industrial Symbiosis Literature Review. Research Paper for the Spring 2005 Industrial Ecology Course. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.

Frosch R.A., Gallopoulos N., 1989. Strategies for Manufacturing, Scientific American 9/89; pp. 144-52.

Gertler N., 1995. Industrial Ecosystems: Developing Sustainable Industrial Structures. Dissertation for Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Korhonen J., von Malmborg F., Strachan P.A., Ehrenfield J.R., 2004. Management and Policy Aspects of Industrial Ecology: An Emerging Research Agenda, Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, pp. 289-305.

Lowe E.A., 1997. Creating By-Product Strategies: Strategies for Eco-Industrial Parks, Report for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, CA, Indigo Development International.

Lowe E.A., Evans L.K., 1995. Industrial Ecology and Industrial Ecosystems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 3 (1-2), pp. 47-53.

Lowe E., Warren J., 1996. The Source of Value: an Executive Briefing and Sourcebook on Industrial Ecology. PNNL-10943. Richard, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Mirata M., 2004. Experiences from Early Stages of a National Industrial Programme in the UK: Determinants and Coordination Challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production 12, pp. 967-83.

Nappi, A.F., 1994. Storia di Marghera. Da periferia a città, Marghera, Centro sportivo culturale Catene. Piva F., Tattara G. (Eds.), 1983. I Primi operai di Porto Marghera. Mercato, reclutamento, occupazione 1917-1940, Marsilio Editore.

Trifirò F., 2006. Marghera: da polo chimico a polo logistico, La Chimica e l’Industria 7, p. 5.

Trifirò F., 2008. In extremis si salva la petrolchimica di Marghera e così anche quella del Nord Italia, La Chimica e l’Industria 3, pp. 99-105.

Trifirò F., 2009a. Una speranza per la petrolchimica italiana?, La Chimica e l’Industria 1, p.123.

Trifirò F., 2009b. Perché scompare la petrolchimica in Italia?, La Chimica e l’Industria 4, pp. 15-8.