Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sürekli Gelir Hipotezine İlişkin Kanıtlar: Zaman Serileri Analizi (2004-2012)

KARGI, Bilal (2014): Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sürekli Gelir Hipotezine İlişkin Kanıtlar: Zaman Serileri Analizi (2004-2012). Published in: Akademik Bakış , Vol. 42, No. 1 (February 2014): pp. 1-17.

Abstract

In this study, income and consumption expenditures, which are the reflections of the economic growth’s supply and demand facades, are analyzed. There are six basic hypothesis, which try to explain how consumer spending affected from consumers' income levels and of these the most common is Friedman's "Permanent Income Hypothesis". In this study, evidence for this hypothesis is being sought from Turkey's economy data. As a result of the time-series analysis of quarterly data for the period 2004:01-2012:03, consumers, consumption expenditures are not only affected by current income but also influenced by the expectations of the next period. Indeed, expectations are calculated as the Granger cause of consumer spending. This finding is cited as evidence for Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis for Turkey's economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Evidence for Turkey's Economy Permanent Income Hypothesis: Time Series Analysis (2004-2012)
• Language: Turkish
• Keywords: Permanent Income Hypothesis, Growth, Turkey Economy, Consumption Expenditures, Time Series Analysis
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Alpizar, F., F. Carlsson ve O. J. Stenman. (2005), “How Much Do We Care About Absolute versus Relative Income and Consumption”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 405-421.

Bhalla, S. S. (1980), “Measurement of Permanent Income and Its Application to Saving Behavior”, Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 722-744.

Brenner, J. (2010), “Life-Cycle Variations in the Association Between Current and Lifetime Earnings: Evidence for German Natives and Guest Workers”, Labour Economics, 17, 392-406.

Carroll, C. D. (2009), “Precautionary Saving and the Marginal Propensity to Consume out of Permanent Income”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 780-790.

Carroll, C. D. (2001). “A Theory of the Consumption Function with and Without Liquidity Constraints”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 23-45.

Darby, M. R. (1974). “The Permanent Income Theory of Consumption A Restatement”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2), 228-250.

Deaton, A. (1992), Understanding Consumption, New York: Oxford University Press.

DeJuan, J. P. ve J. J. Seater. (2006), “A Simple Test of Friedman’s Permanent Income Hypothesis”, Economica New Series, 73(289), 27-46.

DeJuan, J. P., J. J. Seater, ve T. S. Wirjanto. (2004), “A Direct Test of the permanent Income Hypothesis with an Application to the U.S. States”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(6), 1091-1103.

DeJuan, J. P., J. J. Seater, ve T. S. Wirjanto. (2006), “Testing the Permanent-Income Hypotesis: New Evidence from West-German States (Lander)”, Empirical Economics, 31, 613-629.

Dickey, D. A. ve W. A. Fuller. (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators of Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.

Dornbusch, R., S. Fischer, ve R. Startz, (2007), Makroekonomi, 9. Baskı, (çev. edt. S. Ak), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.

Duesenberry, J. S. (1949), Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Atıf, Ünsal, 2000’den).

Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J., (1987). “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.

Fisher, I. (1930), The Theory of Interest, as Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It, New York: The Macmillan Company. (Atıf, Ünsal, 2000’den).

Fisher, L. A., H-S. Huh, ve E. W. Tallman. (2003), “Permanent Income and Transitory Variation in Investment and Output”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 25, 149-168.

Friedman, M. (1957), A Theory of the Consumption Function, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Atıf Mankiw, 2010’dan).

Gausden, R. ve I. A. Whitfield. (2000), “Testing the Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis Using UK Regional Time-Series Data”, Applied Economics, 32(10), 1299-1310.

Granger, C. W. J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.

Gomes, F. A. R. (2011), “Testing the Permanent Income Hypothesis Using Unit Root Quantile Autoregression Tests”, Applied Economics Letters, 18(18), 1755-1758.

Gourinchas, P-O. ve J. A. Parker. (2001), “The Empirical Importance of Precautionary Saving”, American Economic Review, 91, 406-412.

Gujarati, D. N. (2001), Temel Ekonometri, (çev. Ü. Şenesen ve G. G. Şenesen), İstanbul: Literatür Yayınları.

Hall, R. E. (1978), “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, 86(6), 971-987.

Keynes, J. K. (2008), Genel Teori: İstihdam, Faiz ve Paranın Genel Teorisi, (çev. U. Akalın), İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.

Kim, C. (1996), “Measuring Deviations from the Permanent Income Hypothesis”, International Economic Review, 37(1), 205-225.

Kuznets, S. (1946), “National Income: A Summary of Finding”, NBER Working Paper, No.154.

Laibson, D. (1997), “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62, 443-447.

Laumas, P. S. (1969), “A Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis”, Journal of Political Economy, 77(5), 857-861.

Mankiw, G. N. (2010), Macroeconomics, 7th Ed., New York: Worth Publishers.

Meghir, C. (2002), “A Retrospective on Friedman’s Theory of Permanent Income”, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Papers, University, College London.

Modigliani, F. (1986), “Life Cycle, Individual Thrift and the Wealth of Nations”, The American Economic Review, 76(3), 297-313.

Morley, J. C. (2007), “The Slow Adjustment of Aggregate Consumption to Permanent Income”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(2-3), 615-638.

Pastor, J. M., E. Pons, ve L. Serrano, (2010), “Regional Inequality in Spain: Permanent Income Versus Current Income”, The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 121-145.

Phillips, P.C. B. and P. Perron, (1988), “Testing of a Unit Root in Time Series Regression”, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.

Shirvani, H. ve B. Wilbratte. (2009), “The Permanent Income Hypothesis in Five Major Industrial Countries: A Multivariate Trend-Cycle Decomposition Test”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 33(1), 43-59.

Simon, J. L. ve D. Aigner. (1970), “Cross-Section and Time-Series Tests of the Permanent-Income Hypothesis”, The American Economic Review, 60(3), 341-351.

Singh, B. ve H. Drost. (1971), “An Alternative Econometric Approach to the Permanent Income Hypothesis: An International Comparison”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53(4), 326-334.

Ünsal, E. (2000), Makro İktisat, 3. Baskı, Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık.

Wirjanto, T. S. (1991), “Testing the Permanent Income Hypothesis: The Evidence from Canadian Data”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 24(3), 563-577.

Zeldes, S. P. (1989), “Optimal Consumption with Stochastic Income: Deviations from Certainty Equivalence”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 275-98.