Deconstructing the Gains from Trade: Selection of Industries vs. Reallocation of Workers

Bolatto, Stefano and Sbracia, Massimo (2014): Deconstructing the Gains from Trade: Selection of Industries vs. Reallocation of Workers.

Abstract

In a Ricardian model with CES preferences and general distributions of industry efficiencies, the sources of the welfare gains from trade can be precisely decomposed into a selection and a reallocation effect. The former is the change in average efficiency due to the selection of industries that survive international competition. The latter is the rise in the weight of exporting industries in domestic production, due the reallocation of workers away from less-efficient non-exporting industries. This decomposition, which is hard to calculate in the general case, simplifies dramatically if industry efficiencies are Fréchet distributed, providing easy-to-quantify model-based measures of these two effects. Under this assumption, we also show that when the gains from trade are small, it is the selection effect that matters most; as the gains from trade rise and the size of the export sector grows, so does the importance of the reallocation effect.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: comparative advantage; selection effect; reallocation effect
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F40 - General

References

Alvarez F. and R. Lucas (2007), "General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade," Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 54, pp. 1726-1768.

Arkolakis C., A. Costinot and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2012), "New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?," American Economic Review, Vol. 102, pp. 94-13.

Arkolakis C., A. Costinot, D. Donaldson and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2012), "The Elusive Pro-Competitive Effects of Trade," mimeo, Yale, MIT and University of California, Berkeley.

Arkolakis C., S. Demidova, P. Klenow and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2008), "Endogenous Variety and the Gains from Trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 98, pp. 444-50.

Bernard A., Jensen J.B., Redding S.J., Schott P.K. (2007), "Firms in International Trade," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21, pp. 105-130.

Bernard A., J. Eaton, B. Jensen and S. Kortum (2003), "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 93, pp. 1268-1290.

Bolatto S. (2013), "Trade across Countries and Manufacturing Sectors in a Ricardian World," mimeo, Università di Torino.

Broda C. and D. Weinstein (2006), "Globalization and the Gains from Variety," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121, pp. 541-585.

Caballero R., T. Hoshi and A. Kashyap (2008), "Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan," American Economic Review, Vol. 98, pp. 1943-1977. Chaney T. (2008), "Distorted Gravity: the Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 98, pp. 1707-21.

Costinot A., D. Donaldson and I. Komunjer (2012), "What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas," Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 79, pp. 581-608.

Demidova S. and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2009), "Trade Policy under Firm-Level Heterogeneity in a Small Economy," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 78, pp. 100-112.

Di Nino V., B. Eichengreen and M. Sbracia (2013), "Exchange Rates in a General Equilibrium Model of Trade without Money," mimeo, Banca d'Italia and University of California, Berkeley.

Eaton, J. and S. Kortum (2002), "Technology, Geography and Trade," Econometrica, Vol. 70, pp. 1741-1779.

Eaton J. and S. Kortum (2009), "Technology in the Global Economy: a Framework for Quantitative Analysis," mimeo, Princeton University Press (forthcoming).

Eaton J., S. Kortum and F. Kramarz (2011), "An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms," Econometrica, Vol. 79, pp. 1453-1498.

Feenstra R.C. (1994), "New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices," American Economic Review, Vol. 84, pp. 157-177.

Feenstra R.C. (2010), "Measuring the Gains from Trade under Monopolistic Competition," Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 43, pp. 1-28.

Finicelli A., P. Pagano and M. Sbracia (2013a), "Ricardian Selection," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 89, pp. 96-109.

Finicelli A., P. Pagano and M. Sbracia (2013b), "Trade-Revealed TFP," mimeo, Banca d'Italia.

Goldberg P., A. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik and P. Topalova (2010), "Trade Liberalization and New Imported Inputs," American Economic Review, Vol. 99, pp. 494-500.

Kortum S. (1997), "Research, Patenting, and Technological Change," Econometrica, Vol. 65 (6), pp. 1389-1420.

Krugman P. (1980), "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade," American Economic Review, Vol. 70, pp. 950-959.

Levchenko A.A., Zhang J. (2013), "The Evolution of Comparative Advantage: Measurement and Welfare Implications," mimeo, University of Michigan.

Melitz M. (2003), "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Vol. 71, pp. 1695-1725.

Melitz M. and S.J. Redding (2013), "New Trade Models, New Welfare Implications," NBER Working Paper, No. 18919.

Melitz M. and S.J. Redding (2014), "Missing Gains from Trade?," American Economic Review, forthcoming.

Pavcnik N. (2002), "Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants," Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 69, pp. 245-276.

Ravikumar B. and M. Waugh (2009), "On the Cross-country Distribution of Welfare Gains from Trade," mimeo, New York University.

Simonovska I. and M. Waugh (2014a), "Different Trade Models, Different Trade Elasticities," mimeo, New York University and University of California, Davis.

Simonovska I. and M. Waugh (2014b), "The Elasticity of Trade: Estimates and Evidence," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 34-50.