Testing Sukuk And Conventional Bond Offers Based On Corporate Financing Theories Using Partial Adjustment Models: Evidence From Malaysian Listed Firms

Hanifa, Mohamed Hisham and Masih, Mansur and Bacha, Obiyathulla (2014): Testing Sukuk And Conventional Bond Offers Based On Corporate Financing Theories Using Partial Adjustment Models: Evidence From Malaysian Listed Firms.

Abstract

Sukuk (Islamic debt securities) are dominating the Malaysian capital market with strong support from the government, mega-conglomerates and firms. Sukuk, as an important source of firms’ financing, is increasingly catching up with conventional bonds in terms of volume of transactions and number of sukuk issuances. However, from theoretical perspectives, it is still largely unknown why some firms may consider sukuk issuance while others consistently rely on conventional bond offers. In examining this corporate financing behavior, most studies employed a partial adjustment model to predict whether firm have an optimal debt ratio, in which they partially adjust towards it when they deviate from it, consistent with trade-off prediction. Thus, the objective of this paper is twofold: firstly, to test firm target debt optimizing behavior and secondly, to find firm specific determinants of target debt ratio using a sukuk or conventional bonds issuance4 dataset. Our sample consists of 120 conventional bonds and 80 sukuk issuers from the year 2000 until 2011. We employ two advanced dynamic panel data estimators5, which have resulted in three major findings. Firstly, our results provide stronger support for trade-off view based on firm optimizing behavior among sukuk and conventional bond issuers, however with different issuance motives. Secondly, issuers of partnership-based sukuk and convertible bonds follow closely pecking order view, in which, the former is chosen if firms face a higher information asymmetry cost. Finally, while both exchange-based sukuk and straight bond issuers aligning towards a particular target, only firm with higher sales growth prefer the former. As such, together with industry insights, we attribute our findings that sukuk offers bring unique “benefits” to the issuers that may not be available if conventional bonds are issued instead, although it is against traditional theoretical interpretation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sukuk, conventional bonds, trade-off theory, pecking order theory
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance

References

Abor, J. (2008) ‘Determinants of the Capital Structure of Ghanaian Firms,’ African Economic Research Consortium, AERC Research Paper 176, Nairobi, March 2008

Ali and Salman S. (2003), ‘Risk, Control and Choice of Islamic Financial Contracts’, Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah

Alves, PFP and Ferreira, MA. (2011), ‘Capital Structure and Law Around the World’, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21, 119-150.

Antoniou, A., Guney, Y. and Paudyal, K. (2008), ‘The determinants of capital structure: capital market oriented versus bank oriented institutions, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 59–92.

Arellano, M. and Bond, SR. (1991), ‘Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and application to employment equations’, Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.

Bakar, D. (2009), ‘Collaborative sukuk report, ‘ zawya. [online]. https://www.zawya.com/sukuk/

Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. (2002), ‘Market Timing and Capital Structure’, The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-32.

Baltagi, BH. (2008), ‘Econometric Analysis of Panel Data’, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex.

Bank Negara Malaysia, annual reports 2002 – 2011 Bank Negara Malaysia, monthly statistical extracted from www.bnm.gov.my

Berkovitch, E., Gesser, R. and Sarig, O. (2004), ‘Going public: public debt or public equity?’ The Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, Working paper 31-04. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Blundell, RW. and Bond, SR. (1998), ‘Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models’, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–43.

Bradley, M., Jarrell GA. and Kim EH. (1984), ‘On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence,’ J. Finance, 39(3), 857-880.

Brealey, RA., Myers, SC. and Marcus, A. J., (2009) Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. 6 ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.

Brennan, M. and Kraus, A. (1987), ‘Efficient financing under asymmetric information’, Journal of Finance, 42, 1225-1243.

Brennan, M. and Schwartz, E. (1988), ‘The case for convertibles’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 55-64.

Byoun, S. (2008), ‘How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets?’, Journal of Finance,63, 3069–96.

Chang, X. and Dasgupta, S. (2009), ‘Target behavior and financing: how conclusive is the evidence’, Journal of Finance, 64, 1767–96.

Dang, VA. (2013), ‘Testing capital structure theories using error correction model: evidence from UK, France and Germany’, Applied Economics, 45, 171-190.

De Jong, A., Kabir, R. and Nguyen, TT. (2008), ‘Capitalstructure around the world: the roles of firm- and country-specific determinants’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1954–69.

De Jong, A., Verbeek, M, and Verwijmeren, P. (2011), ‘Firms’ Debt-Equity Decision when The Static Trade-Off Theory and The Pecking Order Theory Disagree’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1301-14.

DeAngelo, H. and Masulis, R. (1980), ‘Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation’, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 3–29.

Deesomsak, R., Paudyal, K. and Pescetto, G. (2004), ‘The Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the Asia Pacific Region’, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 14, 387–405.

Drobetz, W. and Wanzenried, G. (2006), ‘What Determines the Speed of Adjustment to the Target Capital Structure?,’ Applied Financial Economics, 16, 941-958.

Dutordoir, M. and De Gucht, LV. (2004), ‘Why do western europe firms issue convertibles instead of straight debt or equity?,’ Research workshop, Columbia University.

Essig, S. (1991), ‘Convertible securities and capital structure determinants,’ Unpublised PhD thesis, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.

Fama, EF and French, KR. (2005), ‘Financing decisions: who issues stock?’, Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 549–82.

Faulkender, M and Petersen, MA. (2006), ‘Does the Source of Capital Affect Capital Structure?’, The Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 45-79.

Flannery, MJ and Hankins, KW. (2013), ‘Estimating Dynamic Panel Model In Corporate Finance’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 19, 1-19.

Flannery, MJ and Rangan, KP. (2006), ‘Partial adjustment toward target capital structures’, Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 469–506.

Frank, M and Goyal, VK. (2009), ‘Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important?’, Financial Management, 38, 1–37.

Frank, MZ and Goyal, VK. (2003), ‘Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217–48.

Frank, MZ. and Goyal, VK. (2007), ‘Trade-off and pecking order theories of debt, in Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Chap. 12, Vol. 2 (Ed.) B. E. Eckbo, North Holland, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 135–202.

Gaud, P., Jani, E., Hoesli M. and Bender A. (2005), ‘The Capital Structure of Swiss Companies: An Empirical Analysis Using Dynamic Panel Data,’European Financial Management, 11(1), 1-28.

Green, R. (1984), ‘Investment incentives, debt and warrants,’Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 115-136.

Harris, M and Raviv, A. (1991), ‘The theory of capital structure, Journal of Finance, 46, 297–356.

Hennessy, CA. and Whited, TM. (2006), ‘Debt dynamics’, Journal of Finance, 60, 1129–65.

Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., and Titman, S. (2001), ‘The debt equity choice’, Journal of Financial Quantitaive Analysis, 36, 1-24.

Huang, R. and Ritter, JR. (2009), ‘Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 237–71.

Jensen, M. (1986), ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers,’ American Economic Review, 76,323–39.

Khairunisah, I. and Razali, H. (2012), ‘The Impact of Sukuk on Corporate Financing: Malaysia Evidence,’ Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 001 – 011.

Kim, YC. and Stulz, RM. (1992), ‘Is there a global market for convertible bonds?,’ Journal of Business, 75-91.

Lemmon, ML. and Zender, JF. (2010), ‘Debt capacity and test of capital structure theories,’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45, 1161-87.

Lemmon, ML., Roberts, MR. and Zender, JF. (2008), ‘Back to the beginning: persistence and the crosssection of corporate capital structure,’ Journal of Finance, 63, 1575–608.

Lewis, CM., Rogalski, RJ. and Seward, JK. (1999), ‘Is convertible debt a substitute for straight debt or for common equity?,’ Financial Management, 28, 5-27.

Lewis, CM., Rogalski, RJ. and Seward, JK. (2001), ‘The long-run performance of firms that issue convertible debt: an empirical analysis of operating chracteristics, analyst forecast, and risk effects,’ Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (4), 447-474.

Marsh, P. (1982), ‘The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study,’ Journal of Finance, 37, 121-144.

Mayers, D. (1998), ‘Why firms issue convertible bonds: the matching of financial and real investment options,’Journal of Financial Economics, 83-102.

Mayers, D. (2000), ‘Convertible bonds: matching financial and real options,’ Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13 (1), 8-16.

Modigliani and Miller MH. (1963), ‘Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction’, Amer. Econ, 53(3), 433-443.

Modigliani and Miller, MH. (1958), ‘The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment’, Amer. Econ. Rev, 48(3), 261-297.

Modigliani, MM. (1988), ‘Past, present, future’, J. Econ. Perspectives, 2(4), 149-155.

Myers SC. (1986) The search for optimal capital structure, in J. M. Stern and D. H. Chew Jr., The Revolution in Corporate Finance, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 91-99.

Myers, SC. (1977), ‘Determinants of corporate borrowing,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 145–75.

Myers, SC. (1984), ‘The capital structure puzzle,’ Journal of Finance, 34, 575–92.

Myers, SC. (2001), ‘Capital structure,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81–102.

Myers, SC. and Majluf, NS. (1984), ‘Corporate financing and investments decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.

Nagano, M. (2010), ‘Islamic Finance and the Theory of Capital Structure,’ MPRA Paper 24567, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Narayanan, MP. (1988), ‘Debt versus equity under asymmetric information,’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 39-51.

Ozkan, A. (2001), ‘Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: evidence from UK company panel data,’ Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 175–98.

Pandey, IM. (2001), ‘Capital structure and firm characteristics: evidence from an emerging market,’ Indian Institute of Management Ahmadabad, India.

Rajan, RG. and Zingales, L. (1995), ‘What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data’, Journal of Finance, 50, 1421–61.

Rauh JD. and Ameer S., (2010), ‘Capital Structure and Debt Structure,’ SSRN working paper . [Online], [Retrieved January 22, 2012], http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1097577

Roodman, D. (2006), ‘How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to "Difference" and "System" GMM in Stata,’ Center for Global Development, December.1-44.

Ross, SA. (1977), ‘The Determinants of financial structure: The incentive-signaling approach,’ Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 23-40.

Securities Commission of Malaysia Annual Reports, available at: http://www.sc.com.my/(accessed 9 April 2012).

Shah, MESMR. (2012), ‘Dynamic Capital Structure Under Political Patronage: A Pre- And Post- Crisis Analysis Of Malaysia,’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham.

Shahida, S. and Saharah, S. (2013), ‘Why Do Firms Issue Sukuk Over Bonds? Malaysian Evidence,’ Proceeding of the 15th Malaysian Finance Association Conference 2013 (MFA), 2-4 June 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Shyam-Sunder, L. and Myers, S. (1999), ‘Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 51,219–44.

Smith, J., Clifford, W. and Warner, JB. (1979), ‘On financial contracting: an analysis of bond covenants,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (2), 117-161.

Stein, JC. (1992), ‘Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 88-104.

Strebulaev, IA. (2007), ‘Do tests of capital structure theory mean what they say,’ Journal of Finance, 62, 1747–87.

Titman, S. and Wessels, R. (1988), ‘The determinants of capital structure choice,’ Journal of Finance, 43, 1–19.