How Serious is Regional Economic Inequality in Jordan? Evidence from Two National Household Surveys

Shahateet, Mohammed (2006): How Serious is Regional Economic Inequality in Jordan? Evidence from Two National Household Surveys. Published in: American Journal of Applied Sciences , Vol. 3, No. 2 (2006): pp. 1735-1744.

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study is to measure and explain the extent of regional economic inequalities in Jordan. To do so, this study uses the raw data of two national household surveys on expenditure and income that covers 5,971 and 11,153 households in 1997 and 2002, respectively. As a check on the empirical results, the study applies four measures of inequality: The Gini index, Atkinson's index, the 90/10 ratios, and the standard deviation of the natural logarithm. The study concludes that economic inequality has increased over the five years of growth period following 1997. The overall increase is estimated at about 17% indicating a shift in the function of income distribution so that income may have become more unequal. In its evaluation of income distribution, the study has reached the conclusion that regional economic inequality in Jordan is serious and there is a need for a more space-balanced approach.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gini index, Atkinson's index, income distribution, regional economic inequality
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis

References

1. Assaf, G., 1979. The Size Distribution of Income in Jordan, Royal Scientific Society, Amman.

2. Saket, B., 1983. Varying sources of income in the Arab world as a balanced economic strategy. Royal Scientific Society, Amman. [in Arabic].

3. Abu, J.K., M. Buhbe and M. Smadi (Eds.), 1990. Income Distribution in Jordan, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Amman.

4. Kharabsheh, A., 2001. Factors affecting inequality of income distribution in Jordan. Dirasat: Administrative Sci., 28: 365-380.

5. Shaban, R.A., D. Abu-Gaida and A. Al-Naimat, 2001. Poverty Alleviation in Jordan: Lessons for the Future, World Bank, Washington D.C.

6. Barrett, G., T. Crossley and C. Worswick, 1999. Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Discussion Paper No. 404.

7. Borland, J., 1998. Earnings Inequality in Australia: Changes, Causes and Consequences. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 390, Australia National University.

8. Harding, A., 1995. The impact of health, education and housing outlays upon income distribution in Australia in the 1990s. Aust. Econ. Rev., 281: 71-86.

9. Pendakur, K., 1998. Family income and consumption inequality in Canada over 1978-1992. Rev. Income and Wealth, 44: 259-283.

10. Harding, A., 1997. The suffering middle: Trends in income inequality in Australia 1982 to 1993-94. Aust. Econ. Rev., 304: 341-58.

11. Pendakur, K., 2001. Consumption poverty in Canada: 1969 to 1998. Canadian Public Policy, Jun., pp: 1-35. 12. Zaidi, A. and K. de Vos, 2001. Trends in consumption-based poverty and inequality in the European Union during the 1980s. J. Popul. Econ., 14: 367-390.

13. Costa, M. and C. Michelini, 1999. An analysis of the distribution of income and wealth among Italian households. Department of Applied and International Economics Discussion Paper, No. 99.11, Massey University, Aug.

14. Maltagliati, M. and C. Michelini, 1999. Equivalence scales and consumption inequality: A study of household consumption patterns in Italy. Department of Applied and International Economics Discussion Papers, No. 99.04, Massey University, May.

15. Blundell, R. and I. Preston, 1996. Income, expenditure and the livings standards of UK Households. Fiscal Studies, 16: 40-54. Am. J. Appl. Sci., 3 (2): 1735-1744, 2006 1744

16. Blundell, R. and I. Preston, 1998. Consumption inequality and income uncertainty. Quart. J. Econ., May: 603-640.

17. Cutler, D. and L. Katz, 1992. Rising inequality? Am. Econ. Rev., 822: 546-551.

18. Slesnick, D., 1998. Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. J. Econ. Literature, 36: 2108-2165.

19. Slesnick, D., 2001. Consumption and Social Welfare. Harvard University Press.

20. Barro, R.J., 2000. Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. J. Economic Growth, 5: 5-32. 21. Milanovic, B., 2005. World Apart: Global and International Inequality 1950-2000. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

22. Behrman, J., N. Birdsall and M. Szekely, 2003. Economic policy and wage differentials in Latin America. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 29, Washington DC.

23. Bardhan, P., 2005. Globalization, inequality and poverty: An Overview. University of California at Berkeley.

24. Alesina, A., R. Tella and R. McCulloch, 2004. Inequality and happiness: Are Americans and Europeans Different? J. Public Econ., 88: 2009– 2042.

25. Gini, C., 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in: Pizetti, E. and Salvemini, T. (Ed.). 1955. Memorie di metodologica statistica: Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Rome.