Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part one: General agendas

Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian (2013): Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part one: General agendas.

Abstract

How can different individuals' probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective probability assignment? Classic results on this problem assume that the set of relevant events -- the agenda -- is a σ-algebra and is thus closed under disjunction (union) and conjunction (intersection). We drop this demanding assumption and explore probabilistic opinion pooling on general agendas. One might be interested in the probability of rain and that of an interest-rate increase, but not in the probability of rain or an interest-rate increase. We characterize linear pooling and neutral pooling for general agendas, with classic results as special cases for agendas that are σ-algebras. As an illustrative application, we also consider probabilistic preference aggregation. Finally, we unify our results with existing results on binary judgment aggregation and Arrovian preference aggregation. Our unified theorems show why the same kinds of axioms (independence and consensus preservation) have radically different implications for different aggregation problems: linearity for probability aggregation and dictatorship for binary judgment or preference aggregation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Probabilistic opinion pooling, judgment aggregation, subjective probability, probabilistic preferences, vague/fuzzy preferences, agenda characterizations, a unified perspective on aggregation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General

References

Aczél, J. (1966) Lectures on Functional Equations and their Applications, Dover Publications Inc., United States of America

Aczél, J., and C. Wagner (1980) "A characterization of weighted arithmetic means", SIAM Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods 1: 259-260

Aczél, J., C. T. Ng and C. Wagner (1984) "Aggregation Theorems for Allocation Problems", SIAM Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods 5: 1-8

Billot, A. (1991) "Aggregation of preferences: The fuzzy case", Theory and Decision 30(1): 51-93

Bradley, R., F. Dietrich, and C. List (forthcoming) "Aggregating Causal Judgments", Philosophy of Science

Chambers, C. (2007) "An ordinal characterization of the linear opinion pool", Economic Theory 33(3): 457-474

Dietrich, F. (2006) "Judgment Aggregation: (Im)Possibility Theorems", Journal of Economic Theory 126(1): 286-298

Dietrich, F. (2007) "A generalised model of judgment aggregation", Social Choice and Welfare 28(4): 529-565

Dietrich, F. (2010) "Bayesian group belief", Social Choice and Welfare 35(4): 595-626

Dietrich, F. (2013) "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation", working paper

Dietrich, F., and C. List (2007a) "Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation", Social Choice and Welfare 29(1): 19-33

Dietrich, F., and C. List (2007b) "Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized", Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4): 391-424

Dietrich, F., and C. List (2010) "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory", Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3

Dietrich, F., and C. List (2013a) "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case", Social Choice and Welfare 40: 1067-1095

Dietrich, F., and C. List (2013b) "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized -- Part two: The premise-based approach", working paper

Dietrich, F., and P. Mongin (2010) "The premise-based approach to judgment aggregation", Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 562-582

Dokow, E., and R. Holzman (2010) "Aggregation of binary evaluations", Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 495-511

Genest, C. (1984) "Pooling operators with the marginalization property", Canadian Journal of Statistics 12: 153-63

Genest, C., and J. V. Zidek (1986) "Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and Annotated Bibliography", Statistical Science 1(1): 113-135

Genest, C., and C. Wagner (1984) "Further Evidence against Independence Preservation in Expert Judgement Synthesis", Technical Report 84-10, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo

Intriligator, M. D. (1973) "A Probabilistic Model of Social Choice", Review of Economic Studies 40(4): 553-560

Lehrer, K., and C. Wagner (1981) Rational Consensus in Science and Society, Dordrecht: Reidel

List, C., and P. Pettit (2002) "Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result", Economics and Philosophy 18(1): 89-110

List, C., and P. Pettit (2004) "Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared", Synthese 140(1-2): 207-235

McConway, K. J. (1981) "Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools", Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 410-414

Mongin, P. (1995) "Consistent Bayesian aggregation", Journal of Economic Theory 66: 313-351

Nehring, K., and C. Puppe (2007) "The structure of strategy-proof social choice -- Part I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces", Journal of Economic Theory 135(1): 269-305

Nehring, K., and C. Puppe (2010) "Abstract Arrovian Aggregation", Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 467-494

Nehring, K., M. Pivato and C. Puppe (2013) "The Condorcet Set: Majority Voting over Interconnected Propositions", working paper

Osherson, D., and M. Y. Vardi (2006) "Aggregating disparate estimates of chance", Games and Economic Behavior 56(1): 148-173

Piggins, A., and J. Perote-Peña (2007) "Strategy-proof Fuzzy Aggregation Rules", Journal of Mathematical Economics 43: 564-580

Priest, G. (2001) An Introduction to Non-classical Logic, Cambridge University Press

Sanver, M. R., and Ö. Selçuk (2009) "Sophisticated Preference Aggregation", Social Choice and Welfare 33: 73-86

Sen, A. (1970 / republished 1979) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco: Holden-Day, and Amsterdam: North Holland

Wagner, C. (1982) "Allocation, Lehrer Models, and the Consensus of Probabilities", Theory and Decision 14: 207-220

Wagner, C. (1985) "On the Formal Properties of Weighted Averaging as a Method of Aggregation", Synthese 62: 97-108

Weymark, J. (1997) "Aggregating Ordinal Probabilities on Finite Sets", Journal of Economic Theory 75: 407-432