Do people care for a sustainable future? Evidence from happiness data.

Bartolini, Stefano and Sarracino, Francesco and Theis, Laurent (2014): Do people care for a sustainable future? Evidence from happiness data.

Abstract

While the various streams of environmentalism agree in claiming that the current patterns of economic activity are unsustainable for natural resources, they disagree in answering the following question: who is the responsible? Two different answers have been provided: the people or the socio-economic system. The first answer claims that people are inter-temporally greedy. Unsustainable economic patterns simply reflect the little importance that current generations attribute to the living standard of future generations. According to the second answer instead, people would prefer a more sustainable path of the economy but some failure of the socio-economic system prevent this outcome. We provide a test of the basic hypothesis on which these two views diverge: the degree of people’s concern for the conditions of life of future generations. We derive this information by estimating the relationship between people’s current subjective well-being and their expectations about the living standard of future generations, i.e. a future far enough to concern only future generations. According to the first view, people’s expectations about the future should have weak or null influence on people’s current well-being. On the contrary, the second view implies that such influence should be positive and remarkable. We use various international and national survey data to estimate a standard happiness regression augmented with people’s expectation about the future. Results suggest that current well-being is sharply and negatively associated to a negative expectation of the future. Where possible, we use 2SLS to account for possible endogeneity between the expectations about the future and current well-being. We find that expecting the worst (the best) for future generations has a very large negative (positive) impact on subjective well-being. This conclusion supports the view that current problems of sustainability are due to some failure of the socio-economic organization and not to the inter-temporal greed of human beings.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sustainability, well-being, life satisfaction, Endogenous Growth, economic growth, discount rate, happiness, intergenerational equity, time preference.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being

References

Antoci, A. and Bartolini, S. (2004). Negative externalities, and labor input in an evolutionary games. Environment and Development Economics, (9):1–22.

Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., and Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3):1033–1059.

Bartolini, S. and Bonatti, L. (2003). Endogenous growth and negative externalities. Journal of economics, 79:123–144.

Bartolini, S. and Bonatti, L. (2008). Endogenous growth, decline in social capital and expansion of market activities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3):917–926.

Blanchflower, D. and Oswald, A. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3):393–415.

Boveé, J. and Dufour, F. (2005). Food for the future: Agriculture for a global age. Cambridge: Polity.

Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.

Bromley, D. W. (1998). Searching for sustainability: the poverty of spontaneous order. Ecological Economics, 24(2):231–240.

Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., and White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1):94–122.

Ehrlich, P. R. and Club, S. (1971). The population bomb, volume 68. Ballantine Books New York.

Ferrer-i Carbonell, A. and Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?*. The Economic Journal, 114(497):641–659.

Gujarati, D. N. (2011). Econometrics by example. Palgrave Macmillan Hampshire, UK.

Holden, C. (1972). Ehrlich versus Commoner: an environmental fallout. Science, 177(4045):245–247.

Kahneman, D. and Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20:3 – 24.

Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity.

Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Penguin, New York.

Lipset, S. M. and Schneider, W. G. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98(3):379–402.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.

Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3):137–158.

Papadakis, E. (1999). Constituents of confidence and mistrust in Australian institutions. Australian Journal of Political Science, 34(1):75–93.

Pearce, D. W., Barbier, E. B., and Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. Earthscan.

Powdthavee, N. (2010). The happiness equation: The surprising economics of our most valuable asset. Icon Books.

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.

Sarracino, F. (2012). Money, sociability and happiness: Are developed countries doomed to social erosion and unhappiness? Social Indicators Research, 109(2):135–188.

Schimmack, U., Krause, P., Wagner, G., and Schupp, J. (2010). Stability and change of wellbeing: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, 95(1):19 – 31.

Schneider, L. and Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research, 94(3):363–376.

Schwarz, N. and Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. D. and Schwarz, N., editors, Well-being: the foundations of hedonist psychology Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

Shiva, V. (2013). Making Peace with the Earth. Fernwood, Black Point.

Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., and Ferrer-i Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1):29–49.

van Reekum, C., Urry, H., Johnstone, T., Thurow, M., Frye, C., Jackson, C., Schaefer, H., Alexander, A., and Davidson, R. (2007). Individual differences in amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity are associated with evaluation speed and psychological well-being. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2):237–248.

Wanous, J. and Hudy, M. (2001). Single-item reliability: a replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4:pp. 361 – 375.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT press.