Estrada, Fernando (2014): Economía política de la modernidad.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_58463.pdf Download (9MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article consists of three parts. The first response to the idea of keeping TOCQUEVILLE own arguments in Old Regime and the Revolution, without reproducing copiously text line by line. This component is the main concerns and conflicting judgments about the revolution, the decisive role that the author gives to religion and how Europe was in ruins. Tocqueville is particularly interested in showing the exacting nature of feudal rights especially in France. Administrative centralization is an institution par excellence of the Old Regime and the same process. In the second part devoted several sessions to understand the reasons TOCQUEVILLE claims to show the history of property rights and land tenure. In the third session we show the influence of the Revolution and encyclopedic deviations could have brought the author. The reformist spirit of the French during the period from the fourteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Tocqueville scholars encounter numerous observations annotations that can supplement your readings.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economía política de la modernidad |
English Title: | Political economics of modernity |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Political economics, History of Economics. Tocqueville, Modernity |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B11 - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic) B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z11 - Economics of the Arts and Literature Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 58463 |
Depositing User: | Fernando Estrada |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2014 16:36 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:12 |
References: | Aaron, Raymond. Las Etapas del Pensamiento Sociológico. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veinte: 1985. Aaron, Raymond. “Tocqueville Retrouvé”, en Tocqueville Review, Otoño de 1979, p. 8- 23. Arendt, Hannah; La Condición Humana. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica, 2001. Arendt, Hannah. Sobre la Revolución. Madrid: Alianza, 1988. Aristóteles. Política. Trad. Patricio de Azcárate. Madrid: Espasa, 2007 Boesche, Roger. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1987. Brogan, H. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Life. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2007. Buber, Martin. ¿Qué es el hombre?, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1992. Burke, E. Textos Políticos. Méjico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1984. Danoff, Brian. “Asking of Freedom Something Other than Itself: Tocqueville, Putnam, and the Vocation of the Democratic Moralist”, Politics & Policy, Volume, 35, No. 2 (2007): 165-190. Drolet, Michael. “Democracy and political economy: Tocqueville’s thoughts on J.-B. Say and T.R. Malthus”, History of European Ideas 29 (2003), p. 159–181. Gannett Jr., Robert. Tocqueville Unveiled: The Historian and His Sources for The Old Regime, and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago, Press, 2003. Guyver, Christopher. The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville, C.B. Welch (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Jardin, André. Alexis de Tocqueville: 1805-1859. Fondo de Cultura Económica: Méjico, 1997. Jones, H. S. “The true Baconian and Newtonian method: Tocqueville's place in the formation of Mill's System of Logic”, History of European Ideas 25 (1999). Koyré, Alexandre. Del Mundo Cerrado al Universo Infinito. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2000. La Capra, Dominick. History and Reading: Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2000. Maletz, Donald. “Tocqueville’s Tyranny of the Majority Reconsidered”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 3, August 2002, p- 741–763. Manent, Pierre . Tocqueville et la Nature de la Démocratie. Paris : Julliard, 1982. MacVarish, Kathryn. “Illusions of revolution: Francois Furet’s critique of Marx”. History of European Ideas 31 (2005) 491–508. Mayer, J.P. Prophet of the Mass Age: A Study of Alexis de Tocqueville. Nueva York: Harper, 1960. Montesquieu, C. Del Espíritu de las Leyes. Madrid: Tecnos, 1980. Offe, C. Reflections on America. Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Smith, Stephen B. Hegel´s Critique of Liberalism. American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 121-139. Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1965. Strauss, Leo. What is Political Philosophy and other Essays. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1988. Tessitore, Aristide. “Alexis de Tocqueville on the Natural State of Religion in the Age of Democracy”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 4, November 2002, p. 1137–1152. Wolin , Sheldon S . 2003. Tocqueville Between Two Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2003. Zuckert, Catherine. “Not by Preaching: Tocqueville on the role of religion in American Democracy”, Review of politics, 1981, vol. 43, No. 2, p. 259-280. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/58463 |