Альтернативный подход к определению условий отсутствия арбитража

Ivanov, Sergei (2014): Альтернативный подход к определению условий отсутствия арбитража.

Abstract

New approach to determining no arbitrage conditions is presented in this paper. Siegel's Paradox was extended to create model. Special attention was made to alternative numeraire change technique that was obtained using presented approach. Results allow making an assumption that there is significant difference between wide-spread models and real markets, and arbitrage is possible far more often then is considered to be. These opportunities are hidden by market underdevelopment. However they may lead to serious changes on markets in the future.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Alternetive way of determining no arbitrage conditions
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: arbitrage, Siegel's Paradox, risk-neutral measure, options, implied probability density, numeraire change.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates

References

Black F., Scholes M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 637–654.

Becherer, D., Davis, M. H. (2010). Arrow–Debreu Prices. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance.

Duffie, D. (2010). Dynamic asset pricing theory. Princeton University Press.

Ioffe, I. D., Prisman, E. Z. (2013). Arbitrage violations and implied valuations: the option market. The European Journal of Finance, 19(4), 298-317.

Jackwerth, J. C. (1999). Option-implied risk-neutral distributions and implied binomial trees: A literature review. The Journal of Derivatives, 7(2), 66-82.

Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of economics and management science, 4(1), 141-183.

Ross, S. (2013). The recovery theorem. The Journal of Finance.

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35-55.