Agricultural Production performance on Small farm holdings: Some Empirical Evidences from Bihar, India

Singh, R.K.P. and Kumar, Abhay and Singh, K.M. and Kumar, Anjani (2014): Agricultural Production performance on Small farm holdings: Some Empirical Evidences from Bihar, India.

Abstract

Immediately after the green revolution period, there was an intense debate on the observed inverse relationship between farm size and per hectare agricultural productivity in India. It was subsequently argued that the higher productivity of small holdings would disappear with the adoption of superior technology, modernisation and growth in general. Recently, National Sample Survey data show that small holdings in Indian agriculture still exhibit a higher productivity than large holdings. This article contributes to the limited literature on farm size and productivity in small land holder's agriculture in Bihar, India. Plot wise panel data of VDSA project are used to reach at precise conclusion. The results provide evidence for a positive relationship between farm size and productivity in case of small land holders’ agriculture and hence, an inverse relationship does not seem to apply within small landholders’ agriculture. A strong positive relationship between farm size and output per hectare is a result of higher use of fertilizer, modern seeds and irrigation sources on comparatively larger land holders than small land holders in Bihar, India. It is mainly due to more uneconomic land holdings of sub-marginal and marginal farmers to have limited access to water resources, quality input and credit. Access to resources and technology must be considered together for any agricultural development programmes for small land holder's agriculture. It is therefore needed to look for ways of improving their access to resources for farming through increased opportunities for earning off farms and off season income or through improved credit market. Hence, small size and land fragmentation are key bottlenecks for the growth of agriculture in Bihar, India. The crop productivity of tiny landholders can be increased through improving their access to institutional financing system, agricultural extension network and farm technology centres. However, promotion of non-farm rural employment seems to be the most appropriate option for increasing crop productivity and improving livelihoods of small landholders in Bihar.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: farm size, productivity, small landholders’ agriculture, Bihar, livelihood, adoption of modern technology
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

References

Berry, R. A, and W. R. Cline. 1976. “Farm Size, Factor Productivity and Technical Change in Developing Countries” (Mimeograph)

Bharadwaj, K. 1974. “Production conditions in Indian Agriculture”, Occasional Paper 33, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press. pp. 104 -105.

Chadha, G. K. 1978. “Farm Size and Productivity Revisited – Some Notes from Recent Experience of Punjab”, Economic & Political Weekly, Review of Agriculture, Vol XIII (39): A87-96

Chattopadhyay, Manabendu and A. Sengupta. 1997. “Farm Size and Productivity – A New Look at the Old Debate”, Economic & Political Weekly, 27 December, Vol XXXII (52): A 172-75.

Fan Shenggen and Connie Chang Kang. 2005. “Is Small Beautiful? Farm Size, Productivity and Poverty in Asian Agriculture”, Agricultural Economics, Vol 32 (Supplements-1): 135-46

Government of India. 2012. “Agricultural Census-2010-11” All India Report on Number and Area of Operational holdings, Agricultural Census Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

Griffin K. B. 1974. “The Political Economy of Agrarian Change”, Macmillan, pp. 23-29

Hanumantha Rao. 1966. “Alternative Explanations of the Inverse Relationship between Farm Size and Output per Acre in India”. Indian Economic Review, Vol 1(2)

Kazi and Toufique. 2005. “Farm Size and Productivity in Bangladesh Agriculture: Role of transaction Costs In Rural Labour Markets”. Economic and Political Weekly, March, 2005

Khan, M. H. 1979. “Farm size and Land Productivity Relationships in Pakistan”. The Pakistan Development Review. Vol.XVIII, No. I, pp. 69-77

Khusro, A. M. 1968. “Returns to Scale in Indian Agriculture”. In A M Khusro (ed.), Readings in Agricultural Development (New Delhi: Allied Publishers)

Mazumdar, Dipak. 1965. “Size of Farm and Productivity: A Problem of Indian Peasant Agriculture”. Economica, Vol 32, May, pp 161-73.

Ramesh Chand, P A Lakshmi Prasanna and Aruna Singh. 2011. “Farm Size and Productivity: Understanding the Strengths of Small holders and Improving their Livelihoods”. Economic and Political Weekly, Supplement,46 (26 &27):5-11

Rudra, Ashok. 1968. “Farm Size and Yield per Acre”. Economic & Political Weekly, Vol III (43): 1041-44.

Saini, G. R. 1971. “Holding Size, Productivity and Some Related Aspects of Indian Agriculture”. Economic & Political Weekly, Review of Agriculture, Vol VI (26): A 79-A85

Sau, R. 1978. “Growth, Employment and Removal of Poverty”. Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number, pp. 94-95.

Sen, A. K. 1964. “Size of Holding and Productivity”. The Economic Weekly, pp. 34- 38

Usha Rani. 1971. “Size of Farm and Productivity”. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol - VI No. 26, June 26, 1971, pp. A85-A87