External terms-of-trade and labor market imperfections in developing countries: theory and evidence

Chaudhuri, Sarbajit and Biswas, Anindya (2014): External terms-of-trade and labor market imperfections in developing countries: theory and evidence.

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of whether developing countries possess any built-in mechanism that can cope with external terms-of-trade (TOT) shocks. Using a two-sector, full-employment general equilibrium model with endogenous labor market distortion theoretically it shows that such countries possess an inherent shock-absorbing mechanism that stems from their peculiar institutional characteristics and can lessen the gravity of detrimental welfare consequence of exogenous TOT movements. This result has been found to be empirically valid based on a panel dataset of 13 countries from 2000-2012. Our analyses lead to recommendation of an important policy that should be adhered to preserve this in-built system.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Terms-of-trade shocks, Labor market imperfection, Welfare, Developing countries, Panel Data.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D59 - Other; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security ; Economic Nationalism; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J42 - Monopsony ; Segmented Labor Markets

References

Baltagi, B.H., Demetriades, P.O. and Law, S.H. (2009): ‘Financial development and openness: Evidence from panel data’, Journal of Development Economics 89(2), 285-296.

Baxter, M. and Kouparitsas, M. A. (2006): ‘What can account for fluctuations in the terms of trade?’, International Finance 9(1), 63-86.

Broda, C. (2004): ‘Terms of trade and exchange rate regimes in developing countries’, Journal of International Economics 63(1), 31-58.

Broda, C. and Tille, C. (2003): ‘Coping with terms-of-trade shocks in developing countries’, Current Issues in Economics and Finance 9(11), Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2014): “Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: A Theoretical Evaluation”, Springer, New Delhi, India.

Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2009): “Revisiting the Informal Sector: A General Equilibrium Analysis”, Springer, New York.

Edwards, S. and Levy-Yeyati, E. (2003): ‘Flexible exchange rates as shock absorbers’, NBER Working Paper 9867. Cambridge, MA.

Haddad, M., Lim. J., Munro, L., Saborowski and Shepherd, B. (2011): ‘Volatility, export diversification, and policy’. In M. Haddad and B. Shepherd Eds.), Managing Openness: Trade and Outward-oriented Growth after the Crisis, World Bank Publications, Chapter 11.

Hoffmann, M. (2007): ‘Fixed versus flexible exchange rates: evidence from developing countries’, Economica 74(295), 425-449.

Mendoza, E. G. (1995): ‘The terms of trade, the real exchange rate, and economic fluctuations’, International Economic Review 36(1), 101-37.

Kose, M.A. (2002): ‘Explaining business cycles in small open economies: How much do world prices matter?’ Journal of International Economics 56(2), 299-327.

Tornell, A. and Velasco, A. (2000): ‘Fixed versus flexible exchange rates: which provides more fiscal discipline?’ Journal of Monetary Economics 45(2), 399-436.

World Bank: World Development Indicators of the World Development Report(s). Washington, DC.

www.ilo.org/ilostat