СОХРАНИТ ЛИ ЭКОНОМИКА УЗБЕКИСТАНА ВЫСОКИЕ ТЕМПЫ РОСТА? СЦЕНАРИИ РАЗВИТИЯ В 2015-30гг.

Popov, Vladimir (2014): СОХРАНИТ ЛИ ЭКОНОМИКА УЗБЕКИСТАНА ВЫСОКИЕ ТЕМПЫ РОСТА? СЦЕНАРИИ РАЗВИТИЯ В 2015-30гг.

Abstract

В последние 10 лет Узбекистан развивался очень успешно – рост ВВП в среднем на 8%, низкий государственный и внешний долг, заниженный валютный курс, равномерное распределение доходов, создание с нуля конкурентоспособной автопромышленности, ориентированной на экспорт. Задача на будущее – не допустить «головокружения от успехов», предусмотреть возможные риски и быть готовым принять адекватные меры.

Рассматриваются два неблагоприятных шока – снижение цен на главные экспортные товары (золото, хлопок, газ) и замедление темпов роста совокупной факторной производительности, а также возможные ответные меры правительства. Обсуждается текущая промышленная политика – поддержка наряду с автомобильной промышленностью отраслей тяжелой химии (производство синтетического топлива и полипропиленовых изделий из газа) с относительно низким уровнем совокупной факторной производительности и темпами ее роста. ============================================================

Uzbekistan in recent 10 years is an extremely successful economy – high growth (8%), low domestic and international debt, undervalued exchange rate, relatively even distribution of income, creation from scratch competitive export oriented auto industry. It is important though to avoid “dizziness from success” and to envisage possible growth traps in the future. This paper discusses two unfavourable scenarios – negative terms of trade shock due to the decline in cotton, gas and gold prices (a deterioration of the current account balance by 10 p.p. of GDP) and a decline in growth rates of total factor productivity (TFP), as well as possible government responses to these shocks, in particular, changes in industrial policy.

In recent years Uzbekistan promotes heavy chemistry industries (production of synthetic fuel and polypropylene goods from natural gas). This is the next stage of industrial policy after reaching food and energy self-sufficiency and successful auto industry development. There are reservations, however, against this strategy. First, gas production is about to decline due to depletion of reserves. Second, the level and growth rates of TFP in heavy chemistry are by far not the highest (they are the highest in light and food industry and in machine building). The increased share of heavy chemistry in total industrial output will cause the decline in the level and the growth rates of TFP. Third, auto industry is already a success, it may be reasonable to continue to support machine building industries of medium level of technology sophistication, like auto industry. For the country of the average size, export specialization in two major areas (autos and heavy chemistry) may be excessive.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: CAN UZBEKISTAN ECONOMY RETAIN ITS HIGH GROWTH RATE? SCENARIOS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN 2015-30
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: Uzbekistan, scenarios of economic development in 2015-30,industrial policy, reaction to shocks, terms of trade, total factor productivity
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East

References

Попов В.В. (2002). Три капельки воды: заметки некитаиста о Китае. – Москва, Издательство «Дело», 2002г.

Попов В.В. (2014). Экономическое чудо переходного периода: как Узбекистану удалось то, что не удалось ни одной постсоветской экономике. - "Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации", № 1 (21), 2014.

Чепель С.В. и др. (2010). Экономический рост и инновации: теория, практика и моделирование. Институт прогнозирования и макроэкономических исследований, Ташкент, 2010.

Чепель С.В. и др. (2014). Расчеты совокупной факторной производительности по отраслям. Личная беседа, апрель 2014 г.

APO (2013). APO Productivity Databook, 2013. http://www.apo-tokyo.org/publications/files/APO_Productivity_Databook_2013.pdf

Chen, E. (2002) The Total Factor Productivity Debate: Determinants of Economic Growth in East Asia, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 18-39. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8411.00002/pdf

Eden, Maya, Aart Kraay (2014). “Crowding in” and the Returns to Government Investment in Low-Income Countries. Policy Research Working Paper 6781. The World Bank February 2014.

Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. (2006). What You Export Matters. NBER Working Paper. January.

Jomo, K.S. (2013). The best approach to economic development is pragmatism. In: 22 Ideas to Fix the World Conversations with the World’s Foremost Thinkers, P. Dutkiewicz and R. Sakwa (eds), New York University Press, New York.

Lee, Keun (2013). Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-up. Knowledge, Path-Creation, and the Middle-Income Trap. Cambridge, 2013.

Lin, Justin Yifu (2011). From Flying Geese to Leading Dragons. New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper 5702. June 2011.

Popov, V. (2010). Life Cycle of the Centrally Planned Economy: Why Soviet Growth Rates Peaked in the 1950s. Paper presented at American Economic Association Annual Meeting in Boston, January 2006. CEFIR and NES working paper # 152. November 2010. <Почему снижались темпы роста советской экономики в брежневский период. - Неприкосновенный запас, №2 (52), 2007.>

Rodrik D. (2006). What’s So Special about China’s Exports? // Harvard University, January.

Schmidt-Hebbel K., Serven L., Solimano A. 1996. Saving and Investment: Paradigms, Puzzles, Policies. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol.11, No.l:87-117.

Shackleton, Robert (2013). Total Factor Productivity Growth in Historical Perspective. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C. , March 2013. Working Paper 2013–01. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44002_TFP_Growth_03-18-2013.pdf

UNIDO (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: a literature review. – Staff working paper. 02/2007. http://www.unido.org//fileadmin/user_media/Publications/Research_and_statistics/Branch_publications/Research_and_Policy/Files/Working_Papers/2007/WP022007%20-%20Determinants%20of%20total%20factor%20productivity.pdf

UN Population (2014). http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm

World Bank (2013). Uzbekistan Energy/Power Sector Issues Note. Artur Kochnakyan Sunil Kumar Khosla Iskander Buranov, Kathrin Hofer Denzel Hankinson Joshua Finn. Washington DC , 2013

World Development Indicators (2014). http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableSelection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-indicators