George, Babu (2007): SHOULD YOU REWARD MORE THOSE TEACHERS WHO PARTICIPATE MORE? A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF IN-SERVICE TOURISM TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAMS. Published in: TOURISMOS: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism , Vol. 2, No. 2 (November 2007): pp. 11-24.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_6367.pdf Download (129kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abilities to participate and communicate in different social settings is considered to be very important qualities for tourism graduates. Tourism educators are supposed to inculcate these qualities in the students and one the finest means of training. Yet, educators, especially those who belong to the ‘old school’ find it difficult to forego the teacher-dominant one-way lecture method. Thus, ‘student-centered learning’ and ‘teacher-as-facilitator’ are some of the vital-most values that are aimed to be imparted through training programs for in-service academic staff in tourism. Resource persons who handle tourism teacher training program sessions believe that these objectives could best be achieved by rewarding with higher grades those participants who interact more during the sessions. The basic assumption behind this is that encouraging teacher-participants who interact more shall instill in them the spirit of the aforesaid values, which they shall later enact in their professional lives as tourism teachers. The present study conducted in India critically examines this assumption and establishes that rewarding teacher-participants for their interaction might in fact defeat the very same purpose for which the scheme was primarily introduced. The astonishing finding is that those teacher-participants who participate more during the sessions of the in-service training programs constitute the most ‘dictatorial’ ones in their regular teaching roles along with their least participating colleagues. Those who participated moderately were noted to be the best tourism educators in terms of their facilitating student participation and encouraging student centered learning.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | SHOULD YOU REWARD MORE THOSE TEACHERS WHO PARTICIPATE MORE? A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF IN-SERVICE TOURISM TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAMS |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | tourism education, in-service teacher training programs, the value of interaction in learning, interaction as a teacher-participant, interaction as a teacher, India |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism |
Item ID: | 6367 |
Depositing User: | Prof Evangelos Christou |
Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2007 17:57 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 15:24 |
References: | Angrist, J. D. & Lavy, V. (2001). Does teacher training affect pupil learning? Evidence from matched comparisons. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 343–369. Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1974). Teacher Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Castle, S., Fox, R. K. & Souder, K. O. (2006). Do professional development schools (PDSs) make a difference? A comparative study of PDS and non-PDS teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 65-80. Clandinin, D. J. (1995). Still learning to teach. In T. Russel and F. Korthagen (Eds.). Teachers who Teach Teachers, London: Falmer Press, pp. 25-31. Devadoss, S. & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors affecting student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 78, pp.499-507. Fassinger, P. A. (1996). Professors' and students' perceptions of why students participate in class. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 24, No.1, pp.25-33. Good, T. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, Vol. 38, pp.415-428. Hall, R. & Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women. Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges. Hammond, L. D. (2006). The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 57, No.2, pp.120-138. Hawkins, D. E. (2005). Experiential education in graduate tourism studies: An international consulting practicum. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, Vol. 4, No.3, pp.1-29. IITTM (2006). The official website of Indian Institute of Tourism and Travel Management, Gwalior. Http://www.iittm.org. Accessed the 21 st of September 2006. Karp, D. A. & Yoels, W. C. (1976). The college classroom: Some observation on the meaning of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, Vol. 60, pp.421-439. McKeachie, W. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, pp.190-200. Popham, J. (1971). Performance tests of teaching proficiency: Rationale, development, and validation. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 8, No.1, pp.105-117. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London, Routledge. Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No.7, pp.10-18. Ruhanen, L. (2005). Bridging the divide between theory and practice experiential learning: Approaches for tourism and hospitality management education. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, Vol. 5, No.4, pp.33-51. Skinner, B. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. New York, Appleton-Crofts. Singh, S. & Singh, T. V. (2004). Tourism education in India: In search for appropriate integration. In Airey, D. and Tribe, J. The International Handbook of Tourism Education, USA: Elsevier Science. Smith , D. (1977). College classroom interactions and critical thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69, pp.180-190. Truong, T. M., Griswold, W. G., Ratto, M. & Star, S. L. (2002). The ActiveClass Project: Experiments in encouraging classroom participation. Technical Report CS2002-0715, UC San Diego, Department of CSE. Http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/users/wgg/Abstracts/aclass.pdf. Accessed January 2006. UGC. (2006). The official website of the University Grants Commission of India. Http://www.ugc.ac.in. Accessed the 8 th August 2006. Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 34, No.3, pp.3-9. Zeichner, K. M. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, Vol. 28, No.9, pp.4-15. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/6367 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
SHOULD YOU REWARD MORE THOSE TEACHERS WHO PARTICIPATE MORE? A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF IN-SERVICE TOURISM TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAMS. (deposited 19 Dec 2007 17:50)
- SHOULD YOU REWARD MORE THOSE TEACHERS WHO PARTICIPATE MORE? A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF IN-SERVICE TOURISM TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAMS. (deposited 19 Dec 2007 17:57) [Currently Displayed]