Satoh, Atsuhiro and Tanaka, Yasuhito (2015): Relative profit maximization in duopoly: difference or ratio. Forthcoming in: International Journal of Business and Economics
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64096.pdf Download (62kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We compare formulations of relative profit maximization in duopoly with differentiated goods, 1) (Difference case) maximization of the difference between the profit of one firm and that of the other firm, 2) (Ratio case) maximization of the ratio of the profit of one firm to the total profit. We show that in asymmetric duopoly the equilibrium output of the more efficient (lower cost) firm in the ratio case is larger than that in the difference case and the price of the good of the more efficient firm in the ratio case is lower than that in the difference case. For the less efficient firm (higher cost firm) we obtain the converse results.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Relative profit maximization in duopoly: difference or ratio |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | duopoly, relative profit maximization, difference, ratio |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 64096 |
Depositing User: | Yasuhito Tanaka |
Date Deposited: | 05 May 2015 05:26 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 23:03 |
References: | Alchian, A. A. (1950), ``Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory'', Journal of Political Economy, 57, 211-221. Dastidar, K. G.(1995), ``On the existence of pure strategy Bertrand equilibrium'', Economic Theory 5, 19-32. Friedman, M. (1953), Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago. Gibbons, R and K. J. Murphy (1990), ``Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers'', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 30S-51S. Lu, Y. (2011), ``The relative-profit-maximization objective of private firms and endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly'', The Singapore Economic Review, 56, 203-213. Matsumura, T., N. Matsushima and S. Cato (2013) ``Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited'' Economic Modelling, 31, 541-547. Miller, N. H. and A. I. Pazgal (2001), ``The equivalence of price and quantity competition with delegation'', Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 284-301. Satoh, A. and Y. Tanaka (2013) ``Relative profit maximization and Bertrand equilibrium with quadratic cost functions'', Economics and Business Letters, 2, 134-139, 2013. Satoh, A. and Y. Tanaka (2014a) ``Relative profit maximization and equivalence of Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in asymmetric duopoly'', Economics Bulletin, 34, 819-827, 2014. Satoh, A. and Y. Tanaka (2014b), ``Relative profit maximization in duopoly: difference or ratio'', forthcoming in International Journal of Business and Economics. Schaffer, M.E. (1989) ``Are profit maximizers the best survivors? - a Darwinian model of economic behaviour'', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12, 29-45. Tanaka, Y. (2013a) ``Equivalence of Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in differentiated duopoly under relative profit maximization with linear demand'', Economics Bulletin, 33, 1479-1486. Tanaka, Y. (2013b) ``Irrelevance of the choice of strategic variables in duopoly under relative profit maximization'', Economics and Business Letters, 2, 75-83, 2013. Vega-Redondo, F. (1997) ``The evolution of Walrasian behavior'' Econometrica 65, 375-384. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64096 |