Jairo, Acuna-Alfaro and Nguyen, Cuong and Tran, Anh and Phung, Tung (2014): The Urban-Rural Gap in Governance: Evidence from Vietnam. Published in: International Public Management Review , Vol. 16, No. 1 (10 May 2015)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64705.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The relationship between development and governance is a central question in the public administration literature on developing countries. Yet, we still understand little about the gap between urban and rural governance in these nations. Our paper tackles this issue using the novel Vietnam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI). PAPI is Vietnam’s largest nationwide survey, and it is considers six dimensions of local public administration, including participation, transparency, accountability, corruption control, administrative procedures, and public service delivery. Using a small area estimation approach we present three new findings. First, urban citizens report better local governance and public administration than rural citizens do. Second, districts with better reported governance tend to have a smaller urban-rural public administration gap. Third, this gap follows a U-shaped pattern, decreasing initially and then increasing slightly as local living standards rise. These findings have implications for priorities in public administration reforms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Urban-Rural Gap in Governance: Evidence from Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Governance, urban-rural difference, PAPI, small area estimation, Vietnam. |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H0 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis |
Item ID: | 64705 |
Depositing User: | Cuong Nguyen Viet |
Date Deposited: | 31 May 2015 12:21 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 00:37 |
References: | Acuña-Alfaro, J. ed. 2009. Reforming Public Administration in Vietnam: Current Situation and Recommendations. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Vietnam Fatherland Front (VFF), Centre for Community Support Development Studies (CECODES). Ha Noi: National Politics Publishing House. Acuña-Alfaro, J., G. Do, and H. Do. 2010. Measuring Governance and Public Administration for Human Development: A Demand-Side Approach. Background Paper for 2010 National Human Development Report – UNDP. Ha Noi: VASS. Brinkerhoff, D. W. 2008. The State and International Development Management: Shifting Tides, Changing Boundaries, and Future Directions. Public Administration Review 68(6): 985–1001. CECODES, FR, CPP, and UNDP. 2012. The Vietnam Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI): Measuring Citizens’ Experiences. A Joint Policy Research Paper by Centre for Community Support and Development Studies (CECODES), The Front Review of the Central Committee for the Vietnam Fatherland Front (FR), Commission on People’s Petitions of the Standing Committee for the National Assembly of Vietnam (CPP), and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Ha Noi. Drukker, D. M., I. R. Prucha, and R. Raciborski. 2011. A Command For Estimating Spatial-Autoregressive Models With Spatial-Autoregressive Disturbances And Additional Endogenous Variables. Technical report, Stata. Drukker, D. M., P. Egger, and I. R. Prucha. 2010. On Two-Step Estimation of A Spatial Autoregressive Model With Autoregressive Autoregressive Disturbances And Endogenous Regressors. University of Maryland: Department of Economics. Elbers, C., J. Lanjouw, and P. Lanjouw. 2002. Micro-Level Estimation of Welfare. Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 2911. The World Bank. Elbers, C., J. Lanjouw, and P. Lanjouw. 2003. Micro-level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality. Econometrica 71(1): 355–364. Fujita, Masahisa, Paul Krugman, and Tomoya Mori. 1999. On the Evolution of Hierarchical Urban Systems. European Economic Review 43(2): 209–251. Haining, R. P. 2003. Spatial Data Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hnatkovska, V., and A. Lahiri. 2012. The Urban-rural Divide in India. Unpublished manuscript. Hong Liu, Hai Fang, and Zhong Zhao. 2012. Urban-Rural Disparities of Child Health and Nutritional Status in China from 1989 to 2006. IZA DP No. 6528. King, C., and C. Stivers. 1998. Government Is Us: The Citizen Government Connection. PA Times 21 (April 4): 1, 2. Krueger, Anne O. 1974. The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review 64(3): 291–303. Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–99. Lanjouw, Peter, Marleen Marra, and Cuong Nguyen. 2013. Vietnam's Evolving Poverty Map: Patterns and Implications for Policy. Policy Research Working Paper Series 6355, The World Bank. Leftwich, A. 1994. Governance, the State and Politics of Development. Development and Change 25: 363–386. Nguyen, C., Roy van der Weide, and Tran Ngoc Truong. 2010. Construction of Poverty Maps using Agricultural Census in Rural Vietnam. Asian Economic Journal 24(4): 355–390. Nguyen, C. 2011. Poverty Projection Using a Small Area Estimation Method: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Comparative Economics 39(3): 368–382. North, Douglass C. 1994. Economic Performance Through Time. American Economic Review 84(3): 359–368. North, Douglass C. 1995. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. In The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, edited by J.Harriss, J. Hunter, and M. Lewis. London: Routledge. Painter, M. 2003. Public Administration Reform in Vietnam: Problems and Prospects. Public Administration and Development 23: 259–271. Park, A. (2008). Rural-urban inequality in China. Shahid Yusuf y Anthony Saich, China Urbanizes: Consequences, Strategies and Policies, East Asia Economic Prospects, The World Bank, 41-63. Plein L. C. , K. Green, and D. G. Williams. 1998. Organic Planning: A New Approach to Public Participation in local Governance. The Social Science Journal 35(4): 509–523. Poverty Task Force. 2002. Localizing MDGs for Poverty Reduction in Vietnam: Ensuring Good Governance for Poverty Reduction. Vietnam: Joint Report of Government Ministries, Donors and NGOs. Quigley, J. M. 2008. Urbanization, Agglomeration, and Economic Development. Working Paper No. 19, Commission on Growth and Development. Roberts, N. 1997. Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction. Public Administration Review 57(2): 124–132. Sahn, D., and D. Stifel. 2004. Urban-Rural Inequality in Living Standards in Africa. Research Paper No. 2004/4, UNU-WIDER. Saich, T. 2007. Citizens’ Perceptions of Governance in Rural and Urban China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 12(1) 2007: 1-28 Smith, G., and C. A. Huntsman. 1997. Reframing the Metaphor of the Citizen-Government Relationship: A Value-Centered Perspective. Public Administration Review 57(4): 309–318. Stiglitz, J. 2002. Globalization and Discontents. New York: Norton. Thai, T. H., and T. V. H. Le2012. Identifying the Public Administration Reform Performance through the Lens of Provincial Competitiveness Index and GDP Per Capita in Vietnam. Modern Economy 3(1): 11-15. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2002. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York. UNDP. 2011. Social Services for Human Development: Vietnam Human Development Report 2011. Hanoi. World Bank. 2003. Vietnam Development Report 2004: Poverty. The Work Bank. World Bank. 2009. Vietnam Development Report 2010: Modern Institutions. The World Bank Vietnam. World Bank. 2013. Well Begun, Not Yet Done: Vietnam's Remarkable Progress on Poverty Reduction and the Emerging Challenges. The Work Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64705 |