Trade Openness, Structural Transformation, and Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Africa

Kelbore, Zerihun Getachew (2015): Trade Openness, Structural Transformation, and Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Africa.

Abstract

This paper examines the poverty reduction effects of trade openness and structural transformation in Africa. The study uses a panel data covering the period from 1981 to 2010 and constituting 43 African countries. Using System generalized methods of moments, findings show that trade openness initially exacerbates poverty by about 1.3% and after one period lag, it reduces it by about 1.2%. Structural transformation lagged two periods, on the other hand, led to poverty reduction of about 3%. Further, the results show that infrastructure development and fostering the participation of the private sector in the continent greatly contribute towards poverty reduction. The study also confirms the famous 'Bhagwati hypothesis' that growth is good for the poor, as an increase in GDP per capita found to have a proportionate reduction in poverty levels (0.7 to 1%). The study also investigated the causality between trade openness and structural transformation, and the results demonstrated that there is a bi-causality relationship between the two variables. As a robustness check, the results were validated using fixed effects, random effects, and panel vector auto regression (PVAR) models. Thus, the implication is that despite the initial costs inflicted on the poor, African economies need to focus on reforms that help them achieve structural transformation in its broader sense and boost international trade.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Trade openness, structural transformation, Poverty, GMM, Africa
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth

References

Agenor, P.-R. (2004). Does globalization hurt the poor? International Economics and Economic Policy, 1(1), 21–51. doi:10.1007/s10368-003-0004-3

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.

Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 33–49. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.06.011

Clague, C. (1999). Contract-Intensive Money : Contract Enforcement , Property Rights , and Economic Performance, 211(June), 185–211.

Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (1997). NORTH-SOUTH R & D SPILLOVERS. The Economic Journal, 107(440), 134–149.

Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth Still Is Good for the Poor, (August).

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). TRADE , GROWTH , AND POVERTY *. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49.

Fernandes, A. M. (2007). Trade policy, trade volumes and plant-level productivity in Colombian manufacturing industries. Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 52–71. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.03.003

Ferreira, P. C., & Rossi, J. L. (2003). New Evidence from Brazil on Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth. International Economic Review, 44(4), 1383–1405. doi:10.1080/00420986820080431 Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth ? The American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.

Harrison, A., & Hanson, G. (1999). Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles. Journal of Development Economics, 59(1), 125–154. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00008-5

Irwin, D. a., & Terviö, M. (2002). Does trade raise income? Evidence from the twentieth century. Journal of International Economics, 58(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00164-7

Kelbore, ZG (2014). Multidimensional Structural Transformation Index: A New Measure of Development, available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62920/1/MPRA_paper_62920.pdf

Mcmillan, M. S., & Dani, R. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. NBER Working Paper Series, (17143), 1–54. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers17143

Paus, E., Reinhardt, N., & Robinson, M. (2003). Trade liberalization and productivity growth in latin american manufacturing, 1970–98. The Journal of Policy Reform, 6(2), 127–127. doi:10.1080/1384128032000156655

Ravailion, M. (1997). Can high-inequality developing countries escape absolute poverty ?, 56, 51–57.

Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (1996). What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty ? (No. 1694).

Rodrik, D. (2001). The Global Governance of Trade: As If Really Mattered. Background Paper to the UNDP Project on Trade and …, (October). Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:The+Global+Governance+of+Trade:+As+If+Really+Mattered#3

Romer, P. (1994). New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions. Journal of Development Economics, 43(1), 5–38. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(94)90021-3

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2 : An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

Stopler, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941). Protection and Real Wages. The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58–73.

Teignier, M. (2011). The Role of Trade in Structural Transformation, (January), 1–72.

Tsai, P.-L., & Huang, C.-H. (2007). Openness, Growth and Poverty: The Case of Taiwan. World Development, 35(11), 1858–1871. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.013

UNECA. (2014). Ecopnomic Report on Africa: Dynamic industrial policy in africa.