International Trade and Migration: Why Do Migrants Choose Small Countries?

Fedotenkov, Igor (2015): International Trade and Migration: Why Do Migrants Choose Small Countries?

Abstract

This paper analyses the link between migration and sizes of countries. It explains why larger countries (in terms of population) have lower shares of migrants in their populations. First, the data is analysed; next, a macroeconomic model with international trade and migration, explaining the stylised facts, is developed. The model includes country size, which gives rise to cheaper country-specific goods produced in a large country relative to the goods produced in a smaller country. Higher wages in the small country spur immigration to it.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Country size, migration, international trade, population
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F22 - International Migration

References

Alesina, A. (2003). The size of countries: Does it matter? Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2-3), 301-316.

Alesina, A. and E. Spolaore (1997). On the number and size of nations. The Quaterly Journal of Economics 112 (4), 1027-1056.

Amdur, D. (2010). International cross-holdings of bonds in a two-good DSGE model. Economics Letters 108 (2), 163-166.

Amin, M. and J. Haidar (2014). Trade facilitation and country size. Empirical Economics 47 (4), 1441-1466.

Amin, M. and A. Islam (2014). Imports of intermediate inputs and country size. Applied Economics Letters 21 (11), 738-741.

Amiti, M. (1998). Inter-industry trade in manufactures: Does country size matter? Journal of International Economics 44 (2), 231-255.

Armington, P. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 16 (1), 159-178.

Balassa, B. (1969). Country size and trade patterns: Comment. The American Economic Review 59 (1), 201-204.

Blonigen, B. A. and W. W. Wilson (1999). Explaining Armington: What determines substitutability between home and foreign goods? Canadian Journal of Economics 32 (1), 1-21.

Borjas, G. J. (1999). Immigration and welafare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics 17 (4), 607-637.

Comola, M. and M. Mendola (2015). Formation of migrant networks. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 117 (2), 592-618.

De Giorgi, G. and M. Pellizzari (2009). Welfare migration in Europe. Labour Economics 16 (4), 353-363.

Duarte, M. and M. Obstfeld (2008). Monetary policy in the open economy revisited: The case for exchange-rate flexibility restored. Journal of International Money and Finance 27 (6), 949-957.

Elsner, B. (2013a). Does emigration benefit the stayers? Evidence from EU enlargement. Journal of Population Economics 26 (2), 531-553.

Elsner, B. (2013b). Emigration and wages: The EU enlargement experiment. Journal of International Economics 91 (1), 154-163.

Ethier, W. and A. Ray (1979). Gains from trade and the size of a country II. Journal of International Economics 9, 127-129.

Geis, W., S. Uebelmesser, and M. Werding (2013). How do migrants choose their destination country? An analysis of institutional determinants. Review of International Economics 21 (5), 825-840.

Jackson, A. L., D. L. Ortmeyer, and M. A. Quinn (2013). Are immigrants really attracted to the welfare state? International Economics and Economic Policy 10 (4), 491-519.

Keesing, D. B. (1968). Population and industrial development: Some evidence from trade patterns. The American Economic Review 58 (3), 448-455.

Liebig, T. and A. Sousa-Poza (2006). The influence of taxes on migration: evidence from Switzerland. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, 235-252.

Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6), 1695-1725.

Pedersen, P., M. Pytlikova, and N. Smith (2008). Selection and network effects - migration flows into oecd countries 1990-2000. European Economic Review 52, 1160-1186.

Ray, A. (1977). Gains from trade and the size of a country. Journal of International Economics 7, 67-72.

Reinert, K. and D. Roland-Holst (2012). Armington elasticities for United States manufacturing sectors. Journal of Policy Modeling 14 (5), 631-639.

Rose, A. (2006). Size really doesn't matter: In search of a national scale effect. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 20, 482-507.

Shiells, C. R. and K. A. Reinert (1993). Armington models and terms-of-trade effects: Some econometric evidence for North America. The Canadian Journal of Economics 26 (2), 299-316.

Shiells, C. R., R. M. Stern, and A. V. Deardorff (1986). Estimates of the elasticities of substitution between imports and home goods for the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122, 497-519.

Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). Investment in human beings. Journal of Political Economy 70, 80-93.

Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5), 416-424.

van Ewijk, C. and M. Volkerink (2012). Will ageing lead to a higher real exchange rate for the Netherlands? De Economist 160 (1), 59-80.

Wittman, D. (2000). The wealth and size of nations. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (6), 868-884.