Combining the capability approach and Max-Neef’s needs approach for a better assessment of multidimensional well-being and inequalities: a case study perspective with vulnerable teenagers of the region of Paris (France)

Pelenc, Jérôme (2014): Combining the capability approach and Max-Neef’s needs approach for a better assessment of multidimensional well-being and inequalities: a case study perspective with vulnerable teenagers of the region of Paris (France).

Abstract

Few works have tried to articulate the Capability Approach originally developed by Amartya Sen and the Fundamental Human Needs approach developed by Manfred Max-Neef. The goal of this paper is precisely to combine those two approaches in order (i) to build a truly multidimensional framework for assessing well-being and inequalities and (ii) to capture the complexity of human well-being from freedom of choice to needs satisfaction. To test this new framework we have conducted an empirical experimentation with vulnerable teenagers (15-17 years old) living in the suburbs of Paris (Dammarie-les-Lys, France) who suffer strong social exclusion and education difficulties. We have organized participatory workshops and then a questionnaire survey with the vulnerable groups and with a control group in order to assess subjective well-being inequalities. The results clearly demonstrate that the group of vulnerable teenagers suffers inequalities in all dimensions of well-being that we tested. These dimensions correspond to the nine axiological needs (Subsistence, Protection, Affection, Understanding, Participation, Leisure, Creation, Identity, Freedom) and the four existential needs (Being, Having, Doing, Interacting) that Max-Neef identifies in his matrix. Addressing inequalities in all of these dimensions clearly help to operationalize multidimensional well-being assessment. Regarding the theoretical side, on the one hand, our tentative for articulating the two approaches allows us to introduce the two categories of axiological and existential capabilities, to better link the concepts of capabilities, functionings, satisfiers and needs and finally to debate further the idea of a list of well-being dimensions by offering a matrix of ten capabilities. Moreover, the fundamental human approach is complemented by integrating freedom of choice into the conceptualization and assessment of well-being. This allows investigating the potential causes of needs deprivation by using the different parameters that condition the acquisition of capabilities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capabilities; fundamental human needs; subjective well-being; inequalities; education; vulnerable teenagers
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Alkire, S., 2002. Dimensions of human development. World development 30 (2), 181–205.

Alkire, S., 2006. Public debate and value construction in Sen's approach. In: Kaufman, A. (Ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. Routlegde, New-York and London, pp. 133–144.

Alkire, S., 2010. Human development: Definitions, critiques, and related concepts. UNDP research paper 2010/01. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdrp_2010_01.pdf

Biggeri, M., 2007. Children’s Valued Capabilities. In Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (Eds.). (2007). Amartya Sen's capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 197-214. 197.

Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L., 2006. Children Conceptualizing their Capabilities: Results of a Survey Conducted during the First Children's World Congress on Child Labour*. Journal of Human Development, 7(1), 59-83.

Biggeri, M; Ballet, J; Comim, F., 2011. Children and the Capability Approach. Palgrave MacMillan.

Biggeri, M., & Santi, M., 2012. The Missing Dimensions of Children's Well-being and Well-becoming in Education Systems: Capabilities and Philosophy for Children. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 373-395.

Bonvin, J-M ; Farvaque, N., 2008. Amartya Sen : Une politique de la liberté. Paris: Michalon, 121p.

Boulanger, P-M., Ruwet, C., 2011. Wellbebe ter : une évolution de la matrice wellbebe bis. Rapport de la Phase 3, 2011, 27p.

Cruz, I., Stahel, A., Max-Neef, M., 2009. Towards a systemic development approach: Building on the Human-Scale Development paradigm. Ecological Economics 68 (7), 2021-2030.

Cruz, I., 2006. Human Development assessment through the Human-Scale Development approach: integrating different perspectives in the contribution to a Sustainable Human Development Theory. PhD dissertation, Polytechnic University of Cataluna, 2006, 122p.

Deneulin, S., Sahani, L. (Eds.)., 2010. Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach. Earthscan, London.

Gasper, D., 2002. Is Sen's capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development?. Review of political economy, 14(4), 435-461.

Duraiappah, A.K., 2004. Exploring the Links: Human Well-Being, Poverty and Ecosystem Services. UNEP and IISD. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2004/economics_exploring_the_links.pdf

Guillen-Royo, M., 2010. Realising the 'wellbeing dividend' An exploratory study using the Human Scale Development approach. Ecological Economics. ISSN 0921-8009. 70(2), s 384- 393 . doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.010

Hart, C., 2012. Aspirations, Education and Social Justice: Applying Sen and Bourdieu, Bloomsbury, London.

Hoffman, A. M., 2005. The Capability Approach and educational policies and strategies: Effective life skills education for sustainable development. Paper presented at the HDCA 2005 international conference, Paris, France.

Ibrahim, S., 2011. Poverty, aspirations and wellbeing: afraid to aspire and unable to reach a better life – voices from Egypt. BWPI Working Paper 141, 2011. Disponible sur : http://www.bwpi.manchester.ac.uk/resources/Working-Papers/wps_2011/bwpi-wp-14111.pdf

Kalaora, B., 1993. Le musée vert : radiographie du loisir en forêt. Paris : L’Harmattan.

Max-Neef, M., 1991. Human Scale Development: conception, application and further reflections. New York : The Apex Press. http://www.area-net.org/fileadmin/user_upload/papers/Max-neef_Human_Scale_development.pdf

Merle, P., 2012. Éducation prioritaire Cinq principes pour une refondation. La vie des idees.fr [en ligne]. October 2012. http://www.laviedesidees.fr/Education-prioritaire.html

Nussbaum, M., 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist economics 9 (2-3), 33–59.

OECD., 2012. Programme international pour le suivi des acquis des élèves (PISA). Résultats pour le PISA 2012. Note par pays. http://www.oecd.org/france/PISA-2012-results-france.pdf

O’Neil, J., 2011. The overshadowing of needs. In Rauschmayer, F., Omann, I et Frühmann, J (éds.). Sustainable development: Capabilities, needs and well-being. London: Routledge Studies in Ecological Economics, 25-42.

Otto, H. U., & Ziegler, H., 2010. Education, welfare and the capabilities approach: A european perspective. Barbara Budrich.

Peugny, C., 2013. Le destin au berceau: inégalités et reproduction sociale. Seuil.

Rauschmayer, F., Omann, I., Frühmann, J., (Eds.)., 2011. Sustainable development: capabilities, needs, and well-being. Routledge.

Robeyns, I., 2005. The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 6 (1), 93–117

Sen, A., 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.

Sen, A.K., 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sen, A., 2004. Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics 10 (3), 77–80.

Sen, A., 2011. The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.

Trani, J. F., Biggeri, M., & Mauro, V., 2013. The Multidimensionality of child poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social indicators research, 112(2), 391-416.

Van Ootegem, L., & Verhofstadt, E., 2012. Using capabilities as an alternative indicator for well-being. Social indicators research, 106(1), 133-152.

Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (Eds.)., 2007. Amartya Sen's capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wüst, K., & Volkert, J., 2012. Childhood and Capability Deprivation in Germany: A Quantitative Analysis Using German Socio-Economic Panel Data. Social indicators research, 106(3), 439-469.