Kim, Jae (2015): How to Choose the Level of Significance: A Pedagogical Note.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66373.pdf Download (236kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The level of significance should be chosen with careful consideration of the key factors such as the sample size, power of the test, and expected losses from Type I and II errors. While the conventional levels may still serve as practical benchmarks, they should not be adopted mindlessly and mechanically for every application.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | How to Choose the Level of Significance: A Pedagogical Note |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Expected Loss, Statistical Significance, Sample Size, Power of the test |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General |
Item ID: | 66373 |
Depositing User: | Professor Jae Kim |
Date Deposited: | 01 Sep 2015 06:34 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:07 |
References: | Engsted, T. 2009, Statistical vs. economic significance in economics and econometrics: Further comments on McCloskey and Ziliak, Journal of Economic Methodology, 16, 4, 393-408. Gigerenzer, G. 2004, Mindless statistics: Comment on “Size Matters”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 587-606. Johnson, V. E. 2013, Revised standards for statistical evidence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1313476110 Keuzenkamp, H.A. and Magnus, J. 1995, On tests and significance in econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 67, 1, 103–128. Kim, J. H. and Ji, P. 2015, Significance Testing in Empirical Finance: A Critical Review and Assessment, Journal of Empirical Finance, in press. (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2410049) Kish, L. 1959, Some statistical problems in research design, American Sociological Review, 24, 328-338. Labovitz, S. 1968, Criteria for selecting a significance level: a note on the sacredness of 0.05, The American Sociologist, 3, 200-222. Leamer, E. 1978, Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data, Wiley, New York. Lehmann E.L. and Romano, J.S. 2005, Testing Statistical Hypothesis, 3rd edition, Springer, New York. Moore, D.S. and McCabe, G.P. 1993, Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 2nd edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. Morrison, D. E. and Henkel, R. E. 1970, The Significance Test Controversy: A Reader, edited by D. E. Morrison and R. E. Henkel. Aldine Transactions, New Brunswick, NJ. Skipper, J. K. JR., Guenther, A. L. and Nass, G. 1967, The sacredness of .05: a note on concerning the use of statistical levels of significance in social science, The American Sociologist, 2, 16-18. Soyer, E. and Hogarth, R. M. 2012, The illusion of predictability: How regression statistics mislead experts, International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 695-711. Winer, B. J. 1962, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, New York, McGraw-Hill. Ziliak, S. T. and McCloskey, D.N. 2008, The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66373 |
Available Versions of this Item
- How to Choose the Level of Significance: A Pedagogical Note. (deposited 01 Sep 2015 06:34) [Currently Displayed]