Syed Abul, Basher and Andrea, Masini and Sam, Aflaki (2015): Time series properties of the renewable energy diffusion process: Implications for energy policy design and assessment. Published in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66389.pdf Download (582kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Confronted by increasingly tight budgets and a broad range of alternative options, policy makers need empirical methods to evaluate the effectiveness of policies aimed at supporting the diffusion of renewable energy sources (RES). Rigorous empirical studies of renewable energy policy effectiveness have typically relied on panel data models to identify the most effective mechanisms. A common characteristic of some of these studies, which has important econometric implications, is that they assume that the contribution of RES to total electricity generation will be stationary around a mean. This paper reviews such assumptions and rigorously tests the time series properties of the contribution of RES in the energy mix for the presence of a unit root. To that end, we use both individual and panel unit root tests to determine whether the series exhibit non-stationary behavior at the country level as well as for the panel as a whole. The analysis, applied to a panel of 19 OECD countries over the period 1990–2012, provides strong evidence that the time series of the renewable share of electricity output are not stationary in 17 of the 19 countries examined. This finding has important implications for energy policy assessment and energy policy making, which are discussed in the paper.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Time series properties of the renewable energy diffusion process: Implications for energy policy design and assessment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Renewable energy policies, renewable energy diffusion, unit root, cross-sectional dependence. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 66389 |
Depositing User: | Syed Basher |
Date Deposited: | 01 Sep 2015 06:36 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 13:28 |
References: | Aflaki, S., Basher, S.A. and Masini, A. (2014) Does economic growth matter? Technology-push, demand-pull and endogenous drivers of innovation in the renewable energy industry. HEC Paris Research Paper No. MOSI-2015-1070. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2549617 Aguirre, M. and Ibikunle, G. (2014) Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis. Energy Policy 69, 374–384. Apergis, N. and Tsoumas, C. (2011) Integration properties of disaggregated solar, geothermal and biomass energy consumption in the US. Energy Policy 39, 5474–5479. Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M. and Osbat, C. (2004) Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macro-economic data. Econometrics Journal 7, 322–340. Barros, C.P., Gil-Alana, L.A. and Payne, J. (2012) Evidence of long memory behavior in US renewable energy consumption. Energy Policy 41, 822–826. Breitung, J. and Das, S. (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-section dependence. Statistica Neerlandica 59, 414–433. Carley, S. (2009) State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy 38, 3071–3081. Cribari-Neto, F. (1996) On time series econometrics. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 36, 37–60. De Hoyos, R.E. and Sarafidis, V. (2006) Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata Journal 6, 482-496. DeJong,D.N., Nankervis, J.C., Savin, N.E., Whiteman, C.H. (1992) The power problems of unit root tests in time series with autoregressive errors. Journal of Econometrics 53, 323–343. Delmas, M.A. and Montes-Sancho, M.J. (2011) U.S. state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness. Energy Policy 39, 2273–2288. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431. Dong, C.G. (2012) Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development. Energy Policy 42, 476–485. Edenhofer, O., Hirth, L., Knopf, B., Pahle, M., Schlömer, S., Schmid, E. and Ueckerdt, F. (2013) On the economics of renewable energy sources. Energy Economics 40, 12–23. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. and Stock, J.H. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–36. Ferroukhi, R., Ghazal-Aswad, N., Androulaki, S., Hawila, D. and Mezher, T. (2013) Renewable energy in the GCC: Status and challenges. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 7, 84–112. Flora, R., Marques, A.C. and Fuinhas, J.A. (2014) Wind power idle capacity in a panel of European countries. Energy 66, 823–830. Frees, E.W. (1995) Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 69, 393–414. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 32, 675–701. Gengenbach, C., Palm, F. and Urbain, J-P. (2010) Panel unit root tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependencies: Comparison and implications for modelling. Econometric Reviews 29, 111–145. Granger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2, 111–120. The Guardian, (2012) Renewable energy in the EU: which countries are set to reach their targets? 19 June 2012. Hendry, D.F. and Juselius, K. (2002) Explaining cointegration analysis: part I. Energy Journal 21, 1–42. IEA (2008) Deploying Renewables: Principles for Effective Policies. OECD/IEA, Paris. IEA (2009) World Energy Outlook. OECD/IEA, Paris. IEA, (2009). Cities, Towns & Renewable Energy. Yes In My Front Yard. International Energy Agency, Paris. IEA (2011) Deploying Renewables: Best and Future Policy Practice. OECD/IEA, Paris. IEA(2012) World Energy Outlook. OECD/IEA, Paris. Im, K.S., Pesaran, H.M. and Shin, Y., (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53–74. IRENA (2012) Evaluating Policies in Support of the Deployment of Renewable Power. IRENA Policy Brief. IRENA Secretariat, Abu Dhabi. Jenner, S., Groba, F. and Indvik, J. (2013) Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries. Energy Policy 52, 385–401. Lean, H.H. and Smyth, R. (2013) Are fluctuations in US production of renewable energy permanent or transitory? Applied Energy 101, 483–488. Lopez, C., Murray, C.J. and Papell, D.H. (2005) State of the art unit root tests and purchasing power parity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 37, 361–369. Marques, A.C., Fuinhas, J.A. and Manso, J.P. (2010) Motivations driving renewable energy in European countries. A panel data approach. Energy Policy 38, 6877–6885. Marques, A.C., Fuinhas, J.A. and Manso, J.P. (2011) A quantile approach to identify factors promoting renewable energy in European countries. Environmental & Resource Economics 49, 351–366. Marques, A.C. and Fuinhas, J.A. (2012) Are public policies towards renewables successful? Evidence from European countries. Renewable Energy 44, 109–118. Maddala, G.S.and Kim, I-M. (1998) Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Masini, A. and Menichetti, E. (2012) The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Energy Policy 40, 28–38. Menz, F.C. and Vachon, S. (2006) The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: Experiences from the states. Energy Policy 34, 1786–1796. Mezher, T., Dawelbait, G. and Abbas, Z. (2012) Renewable energy policy options for Abu Dhabi: drivers and barriers. Energy Policy 42, 315–328. Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 1519–1554. Pesaran, M.H. and Shin Y. (1999) An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Chapter 11 in Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Strom S (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R.P. (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16, 289–326. Pesaran, M.H. (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. Pesaran, M.H. (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22, 265–312. Phillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P. (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335–346. Phillips, P.C.B. and Moon, H. (1999). Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67, 1057–1111. Phillips, P.C.B., Wu, Y. and Yu, J. (2011) Explosive behaviour in the 1990s Nasdaq: When did exuberance escalate asset values? International Economic Review 52, 201–226. Ragwitz, M. et al. (2007) Assessment and Optimisation of Renewable Energy Support Schemes in the European Electricity Market (OPTRES). Final Report. Intelligent EnergyEurope. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/en/projects/optres Ragwitz, M. et al. (2011) Renewable Energy Policy Country Profiles. Intelligent Energy, Europe, ALTENER. REN21. (2013) Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. Paris. Schwert, G.W. (1989) Tests for unit roots: a Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 147–159. Shrimali, G. and Kneifel, J. (2011) Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources? Energy Policy 39, 4726–4741. Shrimali, G., Jenner, S., Groba, F., Chan, G. and Indvik, J. (2012) Have state renewable portfolio standards really worked? Synthesizing past policy assessments to build an integrated econometric analysis of RPS effectiveness in the US. Discussion Paper 1258. DIW Berlin Smyth, R. (2013) Are fluctuations in energy variables permanent or transitory? A survey of the literature on the integration properties of energy consumption and production. Applied Energy 104, 371–278. Smyth, R. and Narayan, P.K. (2014) Applied econometrics and implications for energy economics research. Forthcoming in Energy Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.023 Wagstyl, S. (2014) German coal use at highest level since 1990. Financial Times. January 7, 2014. Yin, H. and Powers, N. (2010) Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? Energy Policy 38, 1140–1149. Zhang, F. (2013) How fit are feed-in tariff policies? Evidence from the European wind market. Policy Research Working Paper 6376. World Bank, Washington. Zhao, Y., Tang, K.K. and Wang, L-l. (2013) Do renewable electricity policies promote renewable electricity generation? Evidence from panel data. Energy Policy 62, 887–897. Zivot, E. (2006) Modelling Financial Time Series with S-PLUS. Springer. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66389 |