Determinants of e-banking adoption: A non-users perspective in Pakistan

Ali, Muhammad and Chin-Hong, Puah and Arif, Imtiaz (2015): Determinants of e-banking adoption: A non-users perspective in Pakistan.

Abstract

This study has attempted on a motivation to identify the factors that determine the intention of non-users of e-banking service in Pakistan. In this sense, the present study has combined Davi’s technology acceptance model (TAM) with external factors, namely subjective norm (SN), trust (TR), technological self-efficacy (TSE), internet experience (IE) and enjoyment (ENJ) to introduce an extension of the TAM model for the non-users of e-banking service.The proposed TAM model was evaluated in a sample of 412 respondents under the framework of structural equation modeling (SEM). For this purpose, we have used Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) 21 to test the hypothesized model. Overall, the empirical outcome suggests that the ENJ had a greater total effect on perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) while, SN showed a greater total effect on the intention to use (ITU) the e-banking service. Furthermore, the TAM model in our study has successfully extended in order to predict non-users intention to use e-banking service.The study has offered a new and useful insights in the existing literature of the TAM model, specifically for the non-users perspective.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: e-banking, technology acceptance model (TAM), behavioral intention, Pakistan.
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G0 - General; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services

References

Abbad, M., Abbad, R., & Saleh, M. (2011). Limitations of e-commerce in developing countries: Jordan case. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 4(4), 280-291.

Afshan, S., & Sharif, A. (2016). Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 370-387.

Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., 1999. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30 (2), 361–391.

Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., and Stair, R., 2000. Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ajzen, I., 1985. From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. New York: Springer Verlag.

Ali, M., & Chin-Hong, P. (2015). Factors affecting intention to use Islamic personal financing in Pakistan: Evidence from the modified TRA model. MPRA paper number. 66023, University library of Munich, Germany.

Ali, M., & Raza, S. A. (2015). Factors affecting to select Islamic Credit Cards in Pakistan: The TRA Model.MPRA paper number. 64037, University library of Munich, Germany.

Ali, M., & Raza, S. A. (2015). Measurement of Service Quality Perception and Customer Satisfaction in Islamic Banks of Pakistan: Evidence from Modified SERVQUAL Model. MPRA paper number. 64093, University library of Munich, Germany.

Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American sociological review, 37-47.

Amin, H., Rahim Abdul Rahman, A., LaisonSondoh Jr, S., & Magdalene ChooiHwa, A. (2011). Determinants of customers' intention to use Islamic personal financing: The case of Malaysian Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(1), 22-42.

Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C., and Igbaria, M., 2000. An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of Internet usage: an individual perspective. Behavior & Information Technology, 19(1), 69–85.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238.

Bradley, L., & Stewart, K. (2003). A Delphi study of Internet banking. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(5), 272-281.

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach*. Decision Sciences,32(4), 699-719.

Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences,32(4), 699-719.

Cheng, T. E., Lam, D. Y., & Yeung, A. C. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: an empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1558-1572.

Chong, A. Y. L., Darmawan, N., Ooi, K. B., & Lin, B. (2010). Adoption of 3G services among Malaysian consumers: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 8(2), 129-149.

Clarke, A., 1997. The structural and spatial impacts of bank mergers. Abstracts of the Association of American Geographers, Ft Worth, TX, 44–45.

Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health psychology, 7(3), 269.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.

Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A., 1995a. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. InformationSystems Research, 6(2), 118–143.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis, 2.

Crane, D. B., &Bodie, Z. (1996). The transformation of banking. Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 109-117. Cullen, R. (2001). Addressing the digital divide. Online information review,25(5), 311-320.

Daniel, E. (1999). Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of bank marketing, 17(2), 72-83.

Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1003.

Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P., 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (14), 1111–1122.

Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P., 1997. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 35–51.

Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business Research Methods . Boston: Richard D. Irwin. Inc.

Fauziah, Taib, M., Ramayah, T., & Abdul Razak, D. (2008). Factors influencing intention to use diminishing partnership home financing. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(3), 235-248.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.

Gefen, D., 2003. TAM or just plain habit: a look at experienced online shoppers. Journal of End User Computing, 15(3), 1–13.

Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self- efficacy and performance in computer software training.Journal of applied psychology, 74(6), 884.

Gopalakrishnan, S., Wischnevsky, J. D., &Damanpour, F. (2003). A multilevel analysis of factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 50(4), 413-426.

Gorbacheva, E., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., & Becker, J. (2011, June). Acceptance and use of internet banking: a digital divide perspective. In ECIS.

Gounaris, S. P., &Koritos, C. D. (2008). Using the extended innovation attributes framework and consumer personal characteristics as predictors of internet banking adoption. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 13(1), 39-51.

Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., and Yi, M., 2003. Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information and Management, 40(3), 221–232.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Harrison, A. and Rainer, R., 1992. The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9 (1), 93–111.

Ho, C. T. B., & Lin, W. C. (2010). Measuring the service quality of internet banking: scale development and validation. European Business Review, 22(1), 5-24.

Hong, W., Thong, J. Y., &Wai-Man Wong, K. Y. T. (2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.

Howcroft, B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2002). Consumer attitude and the usage and adoption of home-based banking in the United Kingdom.International journal of bank marketing, 20(3), 111-121.

Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision support systems, 38(3), 369-381.

Hussain Chandio, F., Irani, Z., Abbasi, M. S., &Nizamani, H. A. (2013). Acceptance of online banking information systems: an empirical case in a developing economy. Behaviour& Information Technology, 32(7), 668-680.

Igbaria, M., &Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage.Omega, 23(6), 587-605.

Igbaria, M., et al., 1997. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structure equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 279–305.

Igbaria, M., Gamers, T., and Davis, G., 1995. Testing the determinants of micro-computer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87– 114.

Jo Black, N., Lockett, A., Ennew, C., Winklhofer, H., &McKechnie, S. (2002). Modelling consumer choice of distribution channels: an illustration from financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(4), 161-173.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Kesharwani, A., & Singh Bisht, S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303-322.

Khan, S. (2009), Adoption Issues of Internet banking in Pakistani's Firm, Lulea Institue of Technology, 1-100.

Kolodinsky, J. M., Hogarth, J. M., &Hilgert, M. A. (2004). The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(4), 238-259.

Lee, Y., 2006. An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517–541.

Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., &Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS quarterly, 657-678.

Liao, Z. and Cheung, Z., 2001. Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information and Management, 38(5), 299–306.

Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2002). Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information & Management, 39(4), 283-295.

Lin, H. F. (2006). Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. CyberPsychology& Behavior, 9(5), 540-547.

Malhotra, P., & Singh, B. (2010). An analysis of Internet banking offerings and its determinants in India. Internet Research, 20(1), 87-106.

Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information systems research, 9(2), 126-163.

Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. ACM SigMIS Database, 32(3), 86-112.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., &Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.

McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information systems research, 13(3), 334–359.

Mirza, A. P., Wallstrom, A., Beheshti, M. H., &Mirza, O. P. (2009). Internet banking service adoption: private bank versus governmental bank. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(24), 4206-4214.

Mols, N. P. (1999). The Internet and the banks' strategic distribution channel decisions. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(6), 295-300.

Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management, 38(4), 217-230.

Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal-of-Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

Nasri, W. (2011). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking in Tunisia. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(8), p 143.

Nui Polatoglu, V., &Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers' acceptance of Internet banking services. International journal of bank marketing, 19(4), 156-165.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods.

Ong, C. and Lai, J., 2006. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829.

Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies.Information& management, 41(6), 795-804.

Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., &Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet research, 14(3), 224-235.

Ramayah, T., &Suki, N. M. (2006). Intention to use mobile PC among MBA students: implications for technology integration in the learning curriculum.UNITAR e- Journal, 1(2), 1-10.

Raza, S. A., & Hanif, N. (2013). Factors affecting internet banking adoption among internal and external customers: a case of Pakistan. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 7(1), 82-96.

Riemenschneider, C. K., Harrison, D. A., &Mykytyn, P. P. (2003). Understanding IT adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories. Information & Management, 40(4), 269-285.

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., &Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.International Journal of human-computer studies, 64(8), 683-696.

Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York.

Ross, R. D. (1975). Direct, Indirect, and Spurious Effects: Comments on" Causal Analysis of Interorganizational Relations".

Safeena, R., Date, H., &Kammani, A. (2011). Internet Banking Adoption in an Emerging Economy: Indian Consumer's Perspective. Int. Arab J. e-Technol.,2(1), 56-64.

Shah Alam, S., Khatibi, A., SolucisSanthapparaj, A., &Talha, M. (2007). Development and prospects of internet banking in Bangladesh.Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 17(1/2), 56-66.

Shaikh, A. A., &Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 129-142.

Sharif Abbasi, M., Hussain Chandio, F., Fatah Soomro, A., & Shah, F. (2011). Social influence, voluntariness, experience and the internet acceptance: An extension of technology acceptance model within a south-Asian country context. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(1), 30-52.

Speier, C. and Venkatesh, V., 2002. The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. Journal of Marketing, 65 (1), 98–111.

Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.

Teo, T. S., &Pok, S. H. (2003). Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users. Omega, 31(6), 483-498.

Teo, T., Lim, V., and Lai, R., 1999. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega International Journal of Management, 27(1), 25–37.

Venkatesh, V., &Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

Venkatesh, V., et al., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study. International Journal of service industry management, 14(5), 501-519.

Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y., 2003. Predicting the use of webbased information systems: self- efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.

Zmud, R., 1979. Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature. Management Science, 25(10), 966–979.