Status and the Demand for Visible Goods: Experimental Evidence on Conspicuous Consumption

Clingingsmith, David and Sheremeta, Roman (2015): Status and the Demand for Visible Goods: Experimental Evidence on Conspicuous Consumption.

Abstract

Some economists argue that consumption of publicly visible goods is driven by social status. Making a causal inference about this claim is difficult with observational data. We conduct an experiment in which we vary both whether a purchase of a physical product is publicly visible or kept private and whether the income used for purchase is linked to social status or randomly assigned. Making consumption choices visible leads to a large increase in demand when income is linked to status, but not otherwise. We investigate the characteristics that mediate this effect and estimate its impact on welfare.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: status, conspicuous consumption, experiment
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

References

Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B.D. (2009). Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77, 1607-1636.

Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605-1623.

Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 544-555.

Bagwell, L.S., & Bernheim, B.D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. American Economic Review, 86, 349-373.

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 99, 544-555.

Bracha, A., & Vesterlund, L. (2013). How low can you go? Charity reporting when donations signal income and generosity. Working Paper.

Cason, T.N., Masters, W.A., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2010). Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 604-611.

Charles, K.K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 425-67.

Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817-869.

Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M.C. (2013). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60, 38-55.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448-474.

Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2015). A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 18, 609-669.

Dohmen, T. & Falk, A. (2011). Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. American Economic Review, 101, 556-90.

Feltovich, N., Harbaugh, R., & To, T. (2002), Too cool for school? Signaling and countersignalling. RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 630-649.

Frank, R.H. (1999). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. New York: The Free Press.

Frank, R.H. (2008). Should public policy respond to positional externalities? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1777–1786.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.

Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86, 1019-1028.

Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., & Ikäheimo, S. (2008). Social influence and consumption: Evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 735-753.

Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1101-1117.

Holt, C.A., & Laury, S.K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644-1655.

Hopkins, E., & Kornienko, T. (2004). Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game of status. American Economic Review, 94, 1085-1107.

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.

Karlan, D., & McConnell, M. A. (2014). Hey look at me: The effect of giving circles on giving. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 106, 402-412.

Kosfeld, M., & Neckermann, S. (2011). Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 86-99.

Kuhn, P., Kooreman, P., Soetevent, A., & Kapteyn, A. (2011). The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch postcode lottery. American Economic Review, 101, 2226–2247.

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 183-207.

Niederle, M. & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067-1101.

Pan, X.S., & Houser, D. (2011). Competition for trophies triggers male generosity. PloS One, 6(4), e18050.

Ravina, E. (2007). Habit formation and keeping up with the Joneses: Evidence from micro data. Working paper.

Royston, P., & Altman, D.G. (1994). Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: Parsimonious parametric modelling. Applied Statistics, 43, 429-467.

Samek, A.S., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2014). Recognizing contributors: An experiment on public goods. Experimental Economics, 17, 673-690.

Samek, A.S., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2015). Selective recognition: How to recognize donors to increase charitable giving. Working Paper.

Seltzer, N. (2009). 1,014 GRE practice questions. Princeton Review.

Sheremeta, R.M. (2015). Impulsive behavior in competition: Testing theories of overbidding in rent-seeking contests. Working Paper.

Sivanathan N., & Pettit, N.C. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 564‐570.

Soetevent, A. (2005). Anonymity in giving in a natural context – a field experiment in 30 churches. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 2301-2323.

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374.

Veblen, T. (2009 [1899]). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan