Teleological Dynamics of Organizational Performance: From Process to Practice and Performance

Chatterjee, Sidharta (2015): Teleological Dynamics of Organizational Performance: From Process to Practice and Performance.

Abstract

Workforce education forms one of the core aspects of organizational learning which aims for performance as well as efficiency. Learning is goal oriented in business organizations. Organizations activities are highly oriented towards customer satisfaction. Organizations learn from practice and delivery of services to meet consumer needs and necessities. Perfection, efficiency and smart practices define today’s multinational organizational culture. But how multinational organizations achieve such perfections in their business operations? This paper addresses this issue by linking teleological aspects of learning and practice to performance, adoption of routines, and learning-induced adaptation in order to explain how they achieve “perfection” in practice and operations. The paper furthermore attempts to study a particular aspect of organizational (teleological perfectionism) process by modeling scenarios which define goal oriented organizational learning and adaptation, and underpins how such teleological processes effectively benefits organizations in the long run. Conclusions drawn up from an example being modeled in this paper suggests that the role of teleology, or teleological dynamics play significant role in shaping today’s organizations and help explain some (or high) degree of perfectionism in their operations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Teleological perfectionism, learning, motivation, routines
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L20 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M16 - International Business Administration

References

1. Blakcori, F. (2014). The Role of Formal Routines in Organizational Innovation. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(2), 56-70.

2. Cayla, D. (2008). Organizational learning: A process between equilibrium and evolution. Journal of Economic Issues, 553-559.

3. Blume, A., Duffy, J., & Franco, A. M. (2009). Decentralized organizational learning: an experimental investigation. The American Economic Review, 1178-1205.

4. Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M. R., & Yun, S. (2007). Goal Orientation and Goal Setting: Predicting Performance by Integrating Four-Factor Goal Orientation Theory with Goal Setting Processes.

5. Chien, C. C., & Hung, S. T. (2008). Goal orientation, service behavior and service performance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 13(2), 513-529.

6. Horvat, Đ., & Trojak, N. (2013). Learning organization in new economy. Interdisciplinary Management Research, 9, 183-195.

7. Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1994). Goal-setting theory.

8. Lee, T. W., Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1989). Goal setting theory and job performance.

9. Bradford, G. Problems for Perfectionism.

10. Dobre, O. I. (2013). Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 5(1), 53-60.

11. GUȚĂ, A. L. (2014). Ways Of Managing Organizational Learning. SEA-Practical Application of Science, (4), 257-266.

12. Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan management review, 38(1), 9-20.

13. Hofstadter, A. (1941). Objective teleology. The Journal of Philosophy, 29-39.

14. Lunenburg Fred, C. (2011). Goal-Setting Theory of Motivation. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 15(1).

15. Webster, Elizabeth. 2004. "Firms' decisions to innovate and innovation routines." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13.8 (2004): 733-745.

16. Liargovas, P., & Skandalis, K. (2010). Factors Affecting Firm Competitiveness: The Case of Greek Industry. European institute Journal, 2(2), 184-197.

17. Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic management journal, 10(5), 399-411.

18. Button, S., Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1995). Goal orientation in organizational behavior research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48.

19. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

20. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

21. VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 629-640.

22. Argote, L. (2011). "Organizational learning research: Past, present and future". Management Learning 42 (4): 439–446.

23. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

24. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current directions in psychological science, 15(5), 265-268.

25. Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Industrial and corporate change, 5(3), 653-698.

26. Becker, M. C. (2001). The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter. A review of the literature (No. 03-06). Working Paper.

27. Nelson, R. R., S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Eco- nomic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

28. Rust, Roland T.; Lemon, Katherine N.; Zeithaml, Valarie A.: Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 2004, 109-127

29. Dorsey, D. (2010). Three arguments for perfectionism. Noûs, 44(1), 59-79.

30. Greenspon, T.S. (2002) Freeing Our Families From Perfectionism. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.

31. Greenspon, Thomas S. 2014. "Is There an Antidote to Perfectionism?" Psychology in the Schools, November: 986-998.

32. Hurka, Thomas (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford University Press, p. 3.

33. Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2004). Organizational Routines A Sceptical Look (No. 04-13). DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

34. Utterback, J. M. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183(4125), 620-626.

35. Eliyahu M. Goldratt, Jeff Cox. The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. (1984). North River Press