Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements

Pavel, Md Sadik and Chakrabarty, Sayan and Gow, Jeff (2014): Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements. Published in: BMC Health Services Research , Vol. 43, No. 15 (1 February 2015)

Abstract

Background Contingent valuation (CV) is used to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) of consumers for specific attributes to improve the quality of health care they received in three hospitals in Bangladesh.

Methods Random sample of 252 patients were interviewed to measure their willingness to pay for seven specified improvements in the quality of delivered medical care. Partial tobit regression and corresponding marginal effects analysis were used to analyze the data and obtain WTP estimates.

Results Patients are willing to pay more if their satisfaction with three attributes of care are increased. These are: a closer doctor-patient relationship, increased drug availability and increased chances of recovery. The doctor patient relationship is considered most important by patients and exhibited the highest willingness to pay.

Conclusions This study provides important information to policy makers about the monetary valuation of patients for improvements in certain attributes of health care in Bangladesh.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Contingent valuation (CV) Willingness to pay (WTP) Health care Quality attributes Bangladesh
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I11 - Analysis of Health Care Markets; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health

References

Adams MA, Ahmed T, Arifeen E, Evans GT, Huda T, Reichenbach L. Innovation for universal health coverage in Bangladesh: a call to action. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2104–11.

Majumder MA. World Health Statistics 2011: How does Bangladesh compare with other South-East Asian countries? South East Asia J Public Health. 2011;1:4–11.

Mitchell R, Carson R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 1989.

Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiment and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ. 1998;80:64–75.

Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ. 2000;19:173–210.

Nocera S, Telser H, Bonato D. The contingent valuation method in health care. Heidelberg: Springer; 2003.

Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18:951–76.

Mataria A, Donaldson C, Luchini S, Moatti JP. A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications. J Health Econ. 2004;23:1285–311.

Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13:563–73.

Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy. 1999;47:97–123.

O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the “dollars” make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Decis Mak. 1996;16:288–99.

Kim T, Kwak S, Yoo S. Applying multi-attribute utility theory to decision making in environmental planning: a case study of the electric utility in Korea. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;1:597–609.

McDaniels T, Roessler C. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecol Econ. 1998;1998(7):299–312.

Ekstrand C, Carpenter TE. Using a tobit regression model to analyse risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in commercially grown broilers. Prev Vet Med. 1998;37:219–28.

McDonald JF, Moffitt RA. The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat. 1980;62:318–21.

Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24–36.

Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:551–63.

Donaldson C, Jones AM, Mapp TJ, Olson JA. Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: application in health care. Appl Econ. 1998;30:667–77.

Ramsey JB. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J Roy Stat Soc. 1969;31:350–71.

Roncek DW. Learning more from Tobit coefficients: extending a comparative analysis of political protest. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57:503–7.