Gawlik, Remigiusz (2015): Geopolitics and the Development of Internationally Oriented Companies. Published in: Horizons of Politics , Vol. 6, No. 17 (2015): pp. 35-48.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69125.pdf Download (406kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The increasing complexity of management in the global environment creates a need for a deeper understanding of the nature of relations between geopolitical occurrences and the development of Internationally Oriented Companies. Therefore, following a literature review, a conceptual model, including the determinants of development of Internationally Oriented Companies and the geopolitical processes, is proposed. The main research hypothesis states that Internationally Oriented Companies not only profit from their environmental opportunities, but also shape their operating environments in order to gain influence over the foreign policy-making of states. The paper provides its positive verification. The role of weak signals in the early identification of such behaviours is mentioned. A conclusive postulate of transcribing the elaborated model into a computer application for geopolitical decision-making for managers has been formulated.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Geopolitics and the Development of Internationally Oriented Companies |
English Title: | Geopolitics and the Development of Internationally Oriented Companies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | geopolitical growth determinants, weak signals, Internationally Oriented Companies |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F50 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics |
Item ID: | 69125 |
Depositing User: | Ph.D. Remigiusz Gawlik |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jan 2016 14:15 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 06:55 |
References: | Ansoff, I.H. (1975). Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals. Californian Management Review, 1975, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 21-33. Bańka, B. (2003). Klasyczne i współczesne teorie geopolityki. Rocznik Europejskiego Kolegium Polskich i Ukraińskich Uniwersytetów, Nr 1/2002, Lublin: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie - Skłodowskiej, pp. 167-176. Białek, J., Oleksiuk, A. (2009). Gospodarka i geopolityka. Dokąd zmierza świat? [=Economy and Geopolitics. Where the World is heading to?]. Warszawa: Difin. Bierzanek, R., Jakubowski, J., Symonides, J. (1980). Prawo międzynarodowe i stosunki międzynarodowe [=International Law and International Relations]. Warszawa: PWN. David, F.R. (2012). Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases. 14th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Gawlik, R. (2012). Wpływ procesów geopolitycznych na działalność przedsiębiorstw o profilu międzynarodowym. [=The influence of geopolitical processes on the functioning of international enterprises]. Globalne i regionalne wyzwania Restrukturyzacji przedsiębiorstw i Gospodarek. Borowiecki, R., Dziura, M.). Cracow: Fundacja Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, pp. 27-36. Gawlik, R. (2007). The Influence of Intergovernmental Organizations on Main Determinants of the Open Systems Model with Correlation Analysis Method Application. Organizations in Changing Environment. Current Problems, Concepts and Methods of Management. W.M. Grudzewski, I. Hejduk, S. Trzecieliński (Eds). Madison, WI: IEA Press, pp. 90-102. Hiltunen, E. (2008). Good Sources for Weak Signals: A Global Study of Where Futurists Look For Weak Signals. Journal of Future Studies, May 2008, 12(4), s. 21-44. Ilmola, L., Kuusi, O. (2006). Filters of weak signals hinder foresight: Monitoring weak signals efficiently in corporate decision-making. Futures, 2006, 38(8), pp. 908-924. Kelly, P. (2002). Geopolitics of Paraguay: Pivotal Position Within A Model of Geopolitics. Historical Text Archive, Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University Press, pp. 1-45. Kuosa, T. (2010). Futures signals sense-making framework (FSSF): A start-up tool to analyse and categorise weak signals, wild cards, drivers, trends and other types of information. Futures No. 42 (2010), pp. 42-48. Lewandowski, R., Rafalska, G. (2013). The Internationalization Process – A Case Study of PWPW S.A., Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 55 76. Mannermaa, M. (1999). Toolbox ja heikot signaalit. [=Toolbox and weak signals], Futura 2/1999, pp. 32-37. Osterud O. (1988). The Uses and Abuses of Geopolitics. Journal of Peace Research, 1988, Vol. 25(2), pp. 191-199. Scott, D. (2008). The Great Power ‘Great Game’ between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’. Geopolitics, 2008, Vol. 13(1), pp. 1-26. Szromnik, A. (1994). Elementy marketingu międzynarodowego, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie. Wach, K. (2010). Wokół pojęcia europeizacji. [=On Europeanization]. Horyzonty Polityki, 2010, vol. 1, nr 1, pp. 195-208. Wach, K. (2014a). Europeanisation of Entrepreneurship Education in Europe - Looking Back and Looking Forward. Horyzonty Wychowania, 2014, vol. 13, no. 26, pp. 11-32. Wach, K. (2014b). Internationalisation and Globalisation as the Wider Context of Europeanisation Processes from the Macro- and Microeconomic Perspective , Horyzonty Polityki, 2013, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 11-30. Wach, K., (2014c). The scale of internationalisation and Europeanisation of SMEs and their functioning in the spatial systems of the European Union. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja, vol. 10, pp. 136-147. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69125 |