Cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility: A cross-country analysis

Halkos, George and Skouloudis, Antonis (2016): Cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility: A cross-country analysis.

Abstract

The diffusion of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has witnessed a surge in recent years but the rate of adoption among national business sectors diverges considerably. In this paper we attempt to frame the influence of national culture on CSR by assessing national CSR penetration under well-established cultural dimensions. We offer new evidence on the influence of cultural specificity - proxied by Hofstede’s model - on the adoption and endorsement of CSR among national business sectors. Findings suggest that three of the six cultural dimensions affect CSR penetration after controlling for aspects of socioeconomic development. Specifically, elements of long-term versus short-term orientation and indulgence versus restraint affect positively the composite CSR index while uncertainty avoidance has a negative effect. In contrast, the effect of, individualism, power distance and masculinity is found to be insignificant. These findings provide fertile ground to theorists and researchers for a deeper investigation of the impact of parameters that define the cultural specificity of CSR and act as moderators of organizational self-regulation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cultural dimensions; corporate social responsibility (CSR); national index; ranking; Hofstede; cross-country comparison.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F55 - International Institutional Arrangements; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q59 - Other

References

Adler N.J. (2002). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

Beugelsdijk S. and Mudambi R. (2013). MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 413-426.

Birkinshaw J., Young S. and Hood N. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14(2), 227-248.

Blowfield M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility - The failing discipline and why it matters to international relations. International Relations, 19(2), 173-191.

Campbell J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.

Carroll A.B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114-120.

Czinkota M.R. and Ronkainen I.A. (1998). International Marketing. Dryden Press: Orlando.

Dore R. (2000). Stock market capitalism: Welfare capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Egri C.P., Ralston D.A., Milton L., Casado T., Palmer I., Ramburuth P., ... and Girson I. (2006). The influence of personal values and national contexts on attitudes towards corporate responsibilities. In third BC organizational behaviour conference, Vancouver, Canada.

European Commission (2001). Green Paper. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Industrial relations and industrial change. European Commission. Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs Unit EMPL/D.1

European Commission (2012). 3x3 good reasons for EMAS. A publication based on the brochure “7 Good Reasons for EMAS” released by the Office of the German EMAS Advisory Board in 2009 | 2011. Available at www.emas.de/service/pdf-downloads/ugags-broschueren

Evangelinos KI and Halkos G.E. (2002). Implementation of environmental management systems standards: important factors in corporate decision making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 4(3), 311-328.

Franke,G.R. and Nadler S.S. (2008). Culture, economic development, and national ethical attitudes. Journal of business research, 61(3), 254-264.

Gănescu C., Gangone A. and Asandei M. (2014). Assessing the impact of the national cultural framework on responsible corporate behaviour towards consumers: An application of geert hofstedes cultural model. The Amfiteatru Economic journal, 16(35), 351-366.

Gjølberg M. (2009a). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10-22.

Gjølberg M. (2009b). The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies? Socio-Economic Review, 7(4), 605-637.

Gugler P. and Shi J.Y.J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: Lost war in pertaining global competitiveness? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 3-24.

Halkos G. and Evangelinos K. (2002). Determinants of Environmental Management Systems Standards implementation: Evidence from Greek Industry, Business Strategy and the Environment 11(6): 360-375.

Halkos G.E. (2006). Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Giourdas Publications.

Halkos G.E. and Sepetis A. (2007). Can capital markets respond to environmental policy of firms? Evidence from Greece, Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 578-587.

Halkos,G.E. and Tzeremes N.G. (2008)..Trade efficiency and economic development: evidence from a cross country comparison. Applied Economics 40(21), 2749-2764.

Halkos,G.E. and Tzeremes N.G. (2009). Economic efficiency and growth in the EU enlargement. Journal of Policy Modeling 31(6), 847-862.

Halkos G.E. (2011). Econometrics: Theory and Practice, instructions in using EVIEWS, MINITAB, SPSS, EXCEL. Gutenberg Publ.

Hall P.A. and Soskice D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P.A. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press.

Hampden-Turner C. and Trompenaars F. (1993). The seven cultures of capitalism. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Ho F. N.,Wang H.M.D. and Vitell S.J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: the effect of cultural and geographic environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 423-433.

Hofstede G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications.

Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J. and Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Holden N. (2002). Cross-cultural management: A knowledge management perspective. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Inglehart R. (2008). Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1/2), 130-146.

Ioannou I. and Serafeim G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nationlevel institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834-864.

Jackson G. and Apostolakou A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371-394.

Jamali D. and Neville B. (2011). Convergence versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 599-621.

Judge W.Q., Douglas T.J. and Kutan A.M. (2008). Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34, 765-785.

Kogut B. and Singh H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.

Kostova T. and Zaheer S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64-81.

Kirkman B.L., Lowe K.B. and Gibson C.B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320.

Lee S.M. and Peterson S.J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35, 401-416.

Leung K., Bhagat R.S., Buchan N.R., Erez M. and Gibson C.B. (2005). Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 357-378.

Matten D.A. and Moon J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 404-424.

McSweeney B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith and a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89-118.

Midttun A., Gautesen K. and Gjølberg M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369-385.

Mittelstaedt J.D. and Mittelstaedt R.A. (1997). The protection of intellectual property: Issues of origination and ownership. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(1), 14-25.

Monteiro L.F., Arvidsson N. and Birkinshaw J. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1), 90-107.

Newman K.L. and Nollen S.D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4): 753-779.

O'Fallon M.J. and Butterfield K.D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413.

Peng Y.S., Dashdeleg A.U. and Chih H.L. (2012). Does national culture influence firm’s CSR engagement: A cross country study. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 58(9), 40-44.

Ringov D. and Zollo M. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a socio-institutional perspective: the impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476-485.

Roome N. (2005). Some implications of national agendas for CSR. In Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (Eds), Corporate social responsibility across Europe, Springer, 317-334.

Schmitz J. and Schrader J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A microeconomic review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 27-45.

Shenkar O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519-535.

Shenkar O. (2012). Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 12-17.

Skouloudis A. (2014). Revisiting the development of a national corporate social responsibility index. MPRA Paper 64864, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Srnka KJ. (2004). Culture's role in marketers' ethical decision making: an integrated theoretical framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1-34.

Taras V. and Steel P. (2009). Beyond Hofstede: Challenging the ten testaments of cross-cultural research. In C. Nakata (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede: Culture Frameworks for Global Marketing and Management (pp. 40-61). Chicago: Macmillan/Palgrave.

Taras V., Rowney J. and Steel P. (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Approaches, challenges, limitations, and suggestions based on the analysis of 112 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 357-373.

Thanetsunthorn N. (2015). The impact of national culture on corporate social responsibility: evidence from cross-regional comparison. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1-22.

Tihanyi L., Ellstrand A.E., Daily C.M. and Dalton D.R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26, 1157-1177.

Van Everdingen Y. and Waarts E. (2003). The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217-232.

Visser W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 473-479.

Vogel D. (1992). The globalization of business ethics: why America remains distinctive. California Management Review, Fall, 30-49.

Waldman D.A., Sully de Luque M., Washburn N. and House R.J. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 823-837.

Welford R.J. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical elements and best practice. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 31-47.

Welford R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 survey results. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33-52.

Wotruba T.R. (1997). Industry self-regulation: A review and extension to a global setting. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(1), 38-54.