The Top One Percent and Exploitation Measures

Lambert, Thomas and Kwon, Ed (2013): The Top One Percent and Exploitation Measures. Published in: Review of Radical Political Economics (24 July 2015)

Abstract

With the Occupy Movement that recently took place on Wall Street and in other parts of the globe, a lot of attention has recently been given to growing income inequality. The 2008 United States financial crisis, the Great Recession, and the subsequent weak recovery have brought about a more serious focus on income inequality and the widening income gap between the top one percent and other groups. These events have brought about some social unrest and instability in American society perhaps not seen since the Great Depression. How much has the top 1 percent of households gained in terms of income versus the other 99 percent in the United States over the last 30 years or so? Mainstream economists and other social scientists point to various causes which have been mentioned in many scholarly and popular writings. All of these mainstream factors affecting inequality have been found to be statistically significant in one scholarly study or another. This research paper explores other major concepts to explain income inequality rather than to dispute the findings of other existing research efforts. The empirical findings of this paper support radical arguments that income accumulation of those at the top is not connected to the productivity of capital investment, but rather instead is connected to the declining incomes and exploitation of the rest of the US population despite the rising output per worker of the US workforce over the last 30 to 40 years.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: income inequality, rate of exploitation, surplus value, top 1 percent, 99 percent
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian

References

Amsden, A. H. 1981. An international comparison of the rate of surplus value in manufacturing industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics 5(3): 229-249.

Anderson, D. R., D. J. Sweeney, and T. A. Williams. 2008. Statistics for business and economics, 10th ed. Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western.

Becker, J. F. 1977. Marxian political economy: An outline. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Berenson, M. L., D. M. Levine, and T. C. Krehbiel. 2006. Basic business statistics: Concepts and applications, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall Publishers.

Birchfield, V. and M. M. L. Crepaz. 1998. The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialized democracies. European Journal of Political Research 34(1): 175-200.

Bluestone, B. and B. Harrison. 1982. The great u-turn: Corporate restructuring and the polarizing of America. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Congressional Budget Office. 2004. What accounts for the decline in manufacturing employment? Available at http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5078&type=0.

Congressional Budget Office. 2011. Trends in the distribution of income between 1979 to 2007. Available at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/124xx/doc12485/WebSummary.pdf.

Dew-Becker, I. and R. J. Gordon. 2005. Where did the productivity growth go? Inflation dynamics and the distribution of income. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 2: 67-127.

Domhoff, G. W. 2012. Who rules America. Available at http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html.

Foster, J. B., and F. Magdoff. 2009. The great financial crisis: Causes and consequences. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Freeman, R. B. and L. F. Katz. 1995. Difference and changes in wage structures. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Greenhouse, S. and D. Leonhard. 2006. Real wages fail to match a rise in productivity. The New York Times, August 28. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/28wages.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

Hacker, J. S. and P. Peirson. 2010. Winner-take-all politics: Public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics & Society 38 (2): 152-204.

Hughes, J. and L. P. Cain. 1994. American economic history, 4th ed. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

Gordon, D. M. 1996. Fat and mean: The corporate squeeze of working Americans and the myth of managerial “downsizing.” New York, NY: The Free Press.

Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric analysis, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishers.

Jones, C. I. 2001. Introduction to economic growth, 2nd ed. New York, NY: WW Norton Publishers.

Kotz, D. M. 2003. Neoliberalism and the social structure of accumulation theory of long-run capital accumulation. Review of Radical Political Economics 35(3): 263–270.

Kotz, D. M. 2008. Contradictions of economic growth in the neoliberal era: Accumulation and crisis in the contemporary U.S. economy. Review of Radical Political Economics 40(2): 174–188.

Kotz, D. M. 2009. The final conflict: What can cause a system-threatening crisis of capitalism? Science and Society 74 (3): 362–380.

Kotz, D. M., and T. McDonough. 2010. Global neoliberalism and the contemporary social structure of accumulation. In Contemporary capitalism and its crises: Social structure of accumulation theory for the 21st century, ed. T. McDonough,

M. Reich, and D. M. Kotz. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Laffer, A. 2010. “The soak-the-rich Catch-22,” The Wall Street Journal, August 2, 2010. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703977004575393882112674598.html .

Lambert, T. E. 2011. Falling income and debt: Comparing views of a major cause of the great recession. World Review of Political Economy 2(2): 247-261.

Lambert, T. E. 2012. Explaining levels of inequality in OECD nations by using rates of surplus value and profit to wage ratios. World Review of Political Economy 3(3): 313-326.

Lapavitsas, C. 2009. Financialised capitalism: Crisis and financial expropriation. Historical Materialism 17 (2): 114–148.

Lee, F. S. and T.-H. Jo. 2011. Social surplus and heterodox economics. Journal of Economic Issues 45(4): 857-875.

Lowrey, A. 2012. The Buffet tax is really more of a guideline. New York Times, February 16. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/us/politics/white-house-sees-buffett-tax-rule-more-as-a-guide.html?_r=1&ref=annielowrey.

Mankiw, G. 2011. Macroeconomics, 7th ed. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

McNally, D. 2009. From financial crisis to world-slump: Accumulation, financialisation, and the global slowdown. Historical Materialism 17(2): 35–83.

Miller, R. L., D. K. Benjamin, and D. C. North. 2010. The economics of public issues. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Minnich, D. J. 2003. Corporatism and income inequality in the global economy: A panel study of 17 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 42(1): 23-53.

Morin, R. 2012. Rising share of Americans see conflict between rich and poor. Pew Social and Demographic Trends, Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/01/11/rising-share-of-americans-see-conflict-between-rich-and-poor/.

Piketty, T. and E. Saez. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 1-39. (Longer updated version published in A.B. Atkinson and T. Piketty eds., Oxford University Press, 2007) (Tables and Figures Updated to 2008 in Excel format, July 2010).

Piketty, T. and E. Saez. 2006. The evolution of top incomes: A historical international perspective. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 96(2): 200-205.

Roine, J., J. Vlachos, and D. Waldenstrom. 2009. The long-run determinants of inequality: What can we learn from top income data? Journal of Public Economics 93(7): 974-988.

Saez, E. 2009. Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (update with 2007 estimates), August 5. Available at http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2007.pdf.

Sentier R. 2012. The top 1 percent. The Washington Post, February 1. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/the-top-1-percent/2012/02/01/gIQAhRT2iQ_graphic.html.

Sentier R. 2008. Sub-prime solution: How today’s global financial crisis happened and what to do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sentier R. 2012. Finance and the good society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sowell, T. 2012. “Defending tax cuts for the rich: Republicans should revisit the arguments of the 1920s,” National Review, May 24. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/300752/defending-tax-cuts-rich-thomas-sowell Retrieved on September 6, 2013.

Studenmund, A. H. 1992. Using econometrics: A practical guide. 2nd ed. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

Tabb, W. K. 2010a. Marxism, crisis theory and the crisis of the early 21st century. Science and Society 74(3): 305–323.

Tabb, W. K. 2010b. Financialization in the contemporary social structure of accumulation. In Contemporary capitalism and its crises: Social structure of accumulation theory for the 21st century, ed. T. McDonough, M. Reich, and D. M. Kotz. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2012. GDP and NIPA accounts. Available at http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. Labor force statistics. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpslutabs.htm.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. Manufacturing. Available at http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag31-33.htm#workforce.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. Union members summary. Available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. Educational attainment. Available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/census/half-century/tables.html.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 2013. Budget, historical series. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/.

Uslaner, E. M., and M. Brown. 2005. Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research 33(6): 868-894.

Zafirovski, M. 2003. Measuring and making sense of labor exploitation in contemporary society: A comparative analysis. Review of Radical Political Economics. 35(4): 462-484.