Revisiting Cournot and Bertrand in the presence of income effects

Parenti, Mathieu and Sidorov, Alexander and Thisse, Jacques-François (2014): Revisiting Cournot and Bertrand in the presence of income effects.

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed comparison of two types of oligopolistic competition: quantity competition (Cournot) and price competition (Bertrand) with or without Ford effect: strategic allowing for firm's impact on consumer's income. This is accomplished in a simple general equilibrium model where consumers are endowed with separable preferences. We show that without Ford effect Cournot competition always generates a higher markup than Bertrand competition. This reflects the folk wisdom, according to which Cournot competition is softer than Bertrand competition. Furthermore, as the number of competitors becomes arbitrarily large, both types of oligopolistic competition deliver the same equilibrium outcome. Allowing for Ford effect makes Cournot equilibrium undetermined in prices, while Ford-Bertrand symmetric equilibrium is sill unique, but may not exist when number of firms is not so large. If exists, Ford-Bertrand competition generates a higher markup than Bertrand competition without Ford effect. This reflects the idea that better knowledge implies more market power.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cournot competition; Bertrand competition; Ford effect; general equilibrium
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

References

Behrens, K. and Murata, Y. (2007) General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: A new approach. Journal of Economic Theory 136, 776-787.

Bonanno, G. (1990) General equilibrium theory with imperfect competition. Journal of Economic Surveys 4, 297-328.

d'Aspremont, C., Dos Santos Ferreira, R. and Gérard-Varet, L. (1996) On the Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition. American Economic Review 86, 623-629.

Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J., (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67, 297-308.

Gabszewicz, J. and Vial, J. (1972) Oligopoly à la Cournot in general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Theory 4, 381-400.

Hart, O. (1985) Imperfect competition in general equilibrium: An overview of recent work. In K.J. Arrow and S. Honkapohja, eds., Frontiers in Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Roberts, J. and Sonnenschein, H. (1977) On the foundations of the theory of monopolistic competition. Econometrica 45, 101-113.

Robinson, J. (1934) What is perfect competition? Quarterly Journal of Economics 49, 104-120.

Seade, J. (1980) On the effects of entry, Econometrica 48, 479-489.

Vives, X. (1985) On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria with product differentiation. Journal of Economic Theory 36, 166--175.

Vives, X. (1999) Oligopoly Pricing. Old Ideas and New Tools. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Zhelobodko, E., S. Kokovin, M. Parenti and J.-F. Thisse (2012) Monopolistic competition in general equilibrium: Beyond the constant elasticity of substitution. Econometrica 80, 2765-2784