Works, Richard (2016): Trends in employer costs for defined benefit plans. Published in: Beyond the Numbers , Vol. 5, No. 2 (19 February 2016): pp. 1-9.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69925.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Defined benefit pension plans can provide financial security to retirees who receive the monthly benefit payments throughout their retirement. Defined benefit plans are pension plans that provide guaranteed income during retirement, and are often based on a formula that considers years of service and a percentage of a worker’s salary. Employers have traditionally offered defined benefit plans to their employees, but the high costs associated with these plans have caused many employers to switch to alternate retirement plan options.1 In March 2015, costs for defined benefit plans for private industry employers were approximately 61 cents per employee hour worked, on average. However, when data are averaged only by the employers that offer these plans, the costs are much higher. In this Beyond the Numbers article, we’ll explore how costs fluctuate by industry, occupation, establishment size, and region, and review trends in costs for employees with access to these plans from 2008 to 2015.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trends in employer costs for defined benefit plans |
English Title: | Trends in employer costs for defined benefit plans |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | defined benefit, pension |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J32 - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits ; Retirement Plans ; Private Pensions |
Item ID: | 69925 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Richard Works |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jun 2016 06:12 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:37 |
References: | Kenneth R. Elliott and James H. Moore, Jr., “Cash Balance Pension Plans: The New Wage,” Compensation and Working Conditions (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Summer 2000), www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/cash-balance-pension-plans-the-new-wave.pdf. L. Bernard Green, “What is a Pension Equity Plan,” Compensation and Working Conditions (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 2003), www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/what-is-a-pension-equity-plan.pdf. Program Office. “‘Frozen’ defined-benefit plans,” Program Perspectives (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, April 2010), www.bls.gov/opub/btn/archive/program-perspectives-on-frozen-defined-benefit-plans-pdf.pdf. Program Office. "Retirement costs for defined benefit plans higher than for defined contribution plans,” Beyond the Numbers: Pay and Benefits (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2012), www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-1/pdf/retirement-costs-for-defined-benefit-plans-higher-than-for-defined-contribution-plans.pdf. Scott F. Curtin, “Alternatives to frozen defined benefit pension plans,” Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2009), www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/alternatives-to-frozen-defined-benefit-pension-plans.pdf. Thomas G. Moehrle, John L. Bishow, and Anthony J. Barkume, “Benefit Cost Concepts and the Limitations of ECEC Measurement,” Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2012), www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/benefit-cost-concepts-and-the-limitations-of-ecec-measurement.pdf. William Wiatrowski, “Changing landscape of employment-based retirement benefits,” Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011), www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/changing-landscape-of-emplo yment-based-retirement-benefits.pdf. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69925 |