Marianne, Ojo (2016): Ring fencing Volcker’s Rule? : The Liikanen Report and justifications for ring fencing and separate legal entities revisited.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53116.pdf Download (247kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The predecessor paper to this publication, “Volcker/Vickers Hybrid”: The Liikanen Report and Justifications For Ring Fencing and Separate Legal Entities, considered the merits, objectives and cost-benefit attributes of respective models associated with the Vickers Report, Liikanen Report and Volckers Rule – by way of reference to the degree of separation of legal entities or banking activities involved, as well as whether an outright ban or prohibition on proprietary trading is involved.
This paper is aimed at highlighting why ring fencing not only presents a more feasible and cost effective option to other models, but also why its degree of flexibility provides the more appropriate balance in a financial environment whose trend is increasingly inclined towards conglomeration.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Ring fencing Volcker’s Rule? : The Liikanen Report and justifications for ring fencing and separate legal entities revisited |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Vickers Report; Volcker’s Rule; Liikanen Report; ring fencing; cross-sector services’ risks; liquidity risks; systemic risks; capital requirements; leverage ratios |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law |
Item ID: | 70894 |
Depositing User: | Dr Marianne Ojo |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2016 13:42 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 02:47 |
References: | Daily Telegraph, Paul Volcker: Ring-fencing Banks is Not Enough, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9561624/Paul-Volcker-ringfencing-banks-is-not-enough.html IFLR, Banking Sector Reforms, < http://www.iflr.com/Article/3107360/Banking-sector-reform-a-definitive-guide-to-the-latest developments.html?LS=EMS763204 > IFLR, Why Kay, Volcker Are Wrong About Ring Fencing <http://www.iflr.com/Article/3113446/Banking/Why-Kay-Volcker-are-wrong-aboutringfencing. html> Sheel A and Ganguly M “Ring Fencing Wall Street” http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ringfencing-wall-street/1210651/0 Varriale G, „Liikanen Poll: Volcker/Vickers Hybrid Wrong For Europe's Banks, 18 September 2012 Varriale G, „FSA Prudential Chief: Why Banks Must Be Ring Fenced“ http://www.iflr.com/Article/3114533/EU/FSA-prudential-chief-why-banks-must-beringfenced.html Vickers Report, The Independent Commission on Banking (ICB), Final Report, Recommendations, September 2011 The Final Report of „The High-Level Expert Group on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector“ The Liikanen Report (Final Report, 2nd October 2012) The „Volcker Rule“ , Section 619 of Title VI of the Dodd Frank Act |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70894 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Ring fencing Volcker’s Rule? : The Liikanen Report and justifications for ring fencing and separate legal entities revisited. (deposited 22 Jan 2014 14:34)
- Ring fencing Volcker’s Rule? : The Liikanen Report and justifications for ring fencing and separate legal entities revisited. (deposited 28 Apr 2016 13:42) [Currently Displayed]