The effects of the three-point rule in individual sports: Evidence from chess

Parinduri, Rasyad and Lee, Yoong Hon and Tiong, Kung Ming (2016): The effects of the three-point rule in individual sports: Evidence from chess.

Abstract

We examine the effects of the three-point rule in individual sports. We consider chess in which most tournaments use the standard rule while some tournaments use the Bilbao rule, which is identical to the three-point rule in soccer: We observe the same pairs of chess players playing under both rules, a research design that fits fixed-effect models. We find the Bilbao rule makes games 33 percent more decisive, mostly to white players’ advantage who win 50 percent more games. We identify two mechanisms why the Bilbao rule works: It encourages players to play longer and discourages them from using drawish openings. These results suggest incentive schemes like the three-point rule work in individual sports in which efforts and financial rewards are directly linked and game dynamics and strategic interactions among teammates and with opponents are less complex.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: scoring systems, three-point rule, individual sports, chess, fixed effects model
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism

References

Alchian, A. & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.

Chan, W., Courty, P. & Li, H. (2009). Suspense: Dynamic incentives in sports contests. Economic Journal, 119, 24-46.

Association of Chess Professionals (2016). ACP Survey 2016. Retrieved from http://www.chessprofessionals.org/sites/default/files/ACP Survey 2015.pdf

Ashley, M. (2003). The end of the draw offer? Retrieved from http://www.thechessdrum.net/65thSquare/DrawOffer/DrawOffer3.html

Aylott, M., & Aylott, N. (2007). A meeting of social science and football: Measuring the effects of three points for a win. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 10, 205-222.

Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J. D. (2004). Do the “three-point victory” and “golden goal” rules make soccer more exciting? Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 169-185.

Chessbase (2007). Blindfold Chess World Cup in Bilbao. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/blindfold-che-world-cup-in-bilbao

Dilger, A., & Geyer, H. (2009). Are three points for a win really better than two? A comparison of German soccer league and cup games. Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 305-318.

Fernȃndez, J. (2007), Chess, football and the Bilbao Rule. ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/che-football-and-the-bilbao-rule and http://en.chessbase.com/post/che-football-and-the-bilbao-rule-part-ii

Guedes, J. C., & Machado, F. S. (2002). Changing rewards in contests: Has the three-point rule brought more offense to soccer? Empirical Economics, 27, 607-630.

Haugen, K. K. (2008). Point score systems and competitive imbalance in professional soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 191-210.

Kasimdzhanov, R. (2011). Kasimdzhanov: Open letter to FIDE – with a proposal. ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/kasimdzhanov-open-letter-to-fide-with-a-proposal

Lazear, E. P. & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864. Lazear, E. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346-1361.

Lee, Y. H. and Parinduri, R. A. (2015). Does the three-point rule make soccer more exciting? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design, Journal of Sports Economics, 17(4), 377-395.

Leong, I. and Leung, W.W. (2005), A Cure for SAD (Severe Acute Drawitis)? ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/a-cure-for-sad-severe-acute-drawitis-

McClain, D. L. (2010). Under a new scoring system, fewer ties and drawn games. New York Times, November 13, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/crosswords/chess/14chess.html

Moschini, G. (2010). Incentives and outcomes in a strategic setting: The 3-points-for-a-win system in soccer. Economic Inquiry, 48, 65-79.

Nunn, J. (2005). The draw problem—a simple solution. ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/the-draw-problem-a-simple-solution

Palacious-Huerta, I. (2004). Structural breaks during a century of the world’s most popular sport. Statistical Methods and Applications, 13, 241–258.

Shahade, G. (2011). Greg on chess: Stop the draw. US Chess Federation. Retrieved from https://www.uschess.org/content/view/11351/639/

Shearer, B. (2004). Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: evidence from a field experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 513-534.

Shipov, S. (2011). Shipov: Chess as a sport and the three-point system. ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/shipov-che-as-a-sport-and-the-three-point-system

Sonas, J. (2011). Sonas: what exactly is the problem? ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/sonas-what-exactly-is-the-problem-

Tiong K. M. (2008). Unfought draws – mathematical, logical and practical considerations. ChessBase. Retrieved from http://en.chessbase.com/post/unfought-draws-mathematical-logical-and-practical-considerations

Weeks, M. (2007). Short draws: Issues on the chess table. Chess for All Ages. Retrieved from http://www.mark-weeks.com/aboutcom/aa07a27.htm