Logo
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

What matters and how it matters: A choice-theoretic representation of moral theories

Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian (2016): What matters and how it matters: A choice-theoretic representation of moral theories.

Warning
There is a more recent version of this item available.
[thumbnail of MPRA_paper_71305.pdf]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_71305.pdf

Download (672kB) | Preview

Abstract

We present a new “reason-based” approach to the formal representation of moral theories, drawing on recent decision-theoretic work. We show that any moral theory within a very large class can be represented in terms of two parameters: (i) a specification of which properties of the objects of moral choice matter in any given context, and (ii) a specification of how these properties matter. Reason-based representations provide a very general taxonomy of moral theories, as differences among theories can be attributed to differences in their two key parameters. We can thus formalize several important distinctions, such as between consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories, between universalist and relativist theories, between agent-neutral and agent-relative theories, between monistic and pluralistic theories, between atomistic and holistic theories, and between theories with a teleological structure and those without.

Available Versions of this Item

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact us: mpra@ub.uni-muenchen.de

This repository has been built using EPrints software.

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by Logo of the University Library LMU Munich.