Waknis, Parag and Gaikwad, Ajit (2006): The Deadweight Loss of Diwali.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71999.pdf Download (229kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using survey responses of undergraduate students from a college in India, we conducted an empirical analysis of efficiency of non-monetary gifts exchanged on the occasion of Diwali similar to analysis for Christmas in Waldfogel (1993). We found an average deadweight loss of 15% on all gifts, with gifts of accessories and electronic goods showing a lower loss compared to other types of gifts. We also found that lesser the generational distance between the person gifting and the receiver, lower is the deadweight loss. In addition, there is weak evidence supporting differences in valuation of gifts based on closeness of familial ties as understood in this cultural context. We, however, did not find any systematic difference in valuation of gifts by gender of the recipients.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Deadweight Loss of Diwali |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | consumer behavior, deadweight loss, efficiency, non-monetary gifts. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M30 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General |
Item ID: | 71999 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Parag Waknis |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2016 14:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:02 |
References: | Bauer, T.K. & Schmidt, C.M. (2012). WTP vs. WTA: Christmas Presents and the Endowment Effect. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231 (1), 4.11 Knetsch J.L. & Sinden, J.A. (1984). Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 507-521. List, J. & Shogren, J. (1998). The deadweight loss of christmas: comment. American Economic Review. 88. Mankiw G. (2006). The Economics of Gifts, Web log post. Greg Mankiw’s Blog December 24. Web. April 16, 2016. Pengrast, C. & Stole, L. (2001). The non-monetary nature of gifts, European Economic Review, 45, 1793-1810. Principe K. & Eisenhauer J.G. (2009). Gift-Giving and Deadweight Loss, Journal of Socio-Economics March: 38(2) 215-220.1350–1355. Ruffle, B. & Tykocinski O. (2000). The Deadweight Loss of Christmas: Comment. The American Economic Review 90 (1), 319.324. Serge-Christophe, K. & Ythier, J.M. (2006). Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity: Foundations, Elsevier. Solnick, S. J. & Hemenway, D. (1996). The Deadweight Loss of Christmas: Comment. American Economic Review, December, 86(5), pp. 1299–305. Waldfogel, J. (1993). The Deadweight Loss of Christmas, The American Economic Review, Vol.83, No.5, December, 1328-1336. Waldfogel J. (2005). Does Consumer Irrationality Trump Consumer Sovereignty?, The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 87(4), pages 691-696, November. Waldfogel, J. (2009). Scroogenomics, Princeton University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71999 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The Deadweight Loss of Diwali. (deposited 13 Jan 2014 05:24)
- The Deadweight Loss of Diwali. (deposited 14 Jun 2016 14:11) [Currently Displayed]