Segregation or homologation? Gender differences in recent Italian economic thought

Zacchia, Giulia (2016): Segregation or homologation? Gender differences in recent Italian economic thought.

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the analysis of recent changes in Italian economic thought by examining them from a gender perspective. Following a popular international trend, the use of bibliometric indicators for the purposes of personnel selection has been introduced in Italy, creating a more competitive environment heavily founded on rigid standardized indexes of “scientific productivity”. In this context, recent studies analyze gender differences by considering the willingness to enter competition. By contrast, we aim at describing what were the strategies adopted by men and women economists in terms of research fields, at different stages of their careers. We find that women progressively have converged to the research interests of their male colleagues. Specifically, we find that the decrease in non-mainstream publications, in particular in the fields of heterodox approaches and history of economic thought, is larger among female economists. Systematic follow-up is essential, in particular the creation of specific committee or observatory embodying a gender perspective in all aspects of the academic and research activity in economics in Italy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: recent economic thought; women; research evaluation
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. & F. Rosati (2016). Gender bias in academic recruitment. Scientometrics. 106(1): 119-141.

Addis, E. & P. Villa (2003). The Editorial boards of Italian economics journals: women, gender, and social networking. Feminist Economics. 9(1): 75-91.

Albrecht, J., Bjorklund, A. & S. Vroman (2003). Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?, Journal of Labor Economics. 21: 145-177.

Antonelli, F., Sarra, G. & R. Sorrentino (2013). Il sesso mancante nell’università italiana. In Genere.it. http://www.ingenere.it/articoli/il-sesso-mancante-nelluniversit-italiana.

Baccini, A. & M.C. Marcuzzo (2009). I Dottorati Di Ricerca in Italia: Come Si Formano Gli Economisti?. Economia Politica. 2: 265-78.

Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Cioni, M. & C. Pisani, (2014). Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics. 101(3): 2035-2062.

Backhouse R., Middleton R. & Tribe K. (1997). Economics is what economists do, but what do the numbers tell us?. Mimeo.

Bagilhole, B. (1993). How to keep a good woman down: an investigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 14(3): 261–274.

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M. & N. Zinovyeva (2015). Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?, mimeo.

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini & M., N. Zinovyeva (2014). Do gender quotas pass the test? Evidence from academic evaluations in Italy. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna. LEM Working Paper Series 14.

Backhouse R., Middleton R. & Tribe K. (1997). Economics is what economists do, but what do the numbers tell us?, mimeo.

Bertocchi G., Gambardella A., Jappelli T., Nappi C. & Peracchi F. (2015). Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy. 44 (2):451–466.

Bettio F. & A. Rosselli (2001). Il femminismo (involontario) degli economisti italiani. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti . 6(3):451-457.

Birolo A. & A. Rosselli (2010) Research standards for the Italian young academics: what has changed over the last thirty years?. In Duncan Foley, Heinz D. Kurz, Bertram Schefold & Ian Steedman (eds.) Production, Distribution and Trade. Alternative Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Blau, F. D., Curie J.M., Croson R.T.A. & D. K. Ginther (2010). Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial. American Economic Review. 100(2):348- 352.

Bosquet, C., Combes, P.P. & C. Garcia-Penalosa (2013). Gender and competition: evidence from academic promotions in France. SERC Discussion Papers. SERCDP0147.

Boulding, K. E. (1941). Economic Analysis. New York: Harper.

Carrell, S., Page M.E. & J.E. West (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 125(3): 1101-1144.

Ceci, S.J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn S. & W. M. Williams (2014). Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest .15(3): 75-141.

Checchi, D., Cicognani, S. & N. Kulic (2015). Gender quotas or girls’ networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna. WP DSE 1047.

Cherrier B. (2015). Classifying Economics: a History of the JEL Codes. SSRN-id2537382.

Corsi, M., D'Ippoliti, C. & F. Lucidi (2010). Pluralism at Risk? Heterodox Economic Approaches and the Evaluation of Economic Research in Italy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 69: 1495-1529.

Corsi M. & G. Zacchia (2014). Women Economists in Italy: A Bibliometric Analysis of their Scientific Production in the Past Decade. Working Papers CEB 14-008. ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

De Paola, M. (2016). Gender Gaps and Gender Differences in Preferences and Attitudes: Evidence from Italy. Politica Economica 32(1):3-26.

De Paola, M., Ponzo, M. & V. Scoppa (2016). Are Men Given Priority for Top Jobs? Investigating the Glass Ceiling in the Italian Academia. IZA Discussion Paper 9658.

De Paola, M. & V. Scoppa (2015a). Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender: Evidence from Italian Academia. Economica. 82(325): 162-188.

De Paola, M., Ponzo M. & V. Scoppa (2015b). Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards Competition: Evidence from the Italian Scientific Qualification. IZA Discussion Paper. 8859.

De Paola, M., Gioia, F. & V. Scoppa (2015c). Are females scared of competing with males? Results from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review. 48: 117-128.

D’Ippoliti, C. (2011). Economics and Diversity. New York: Routledge.

D’lppoliti C. & Roncaglia A. (2015). Heterodox economics and the history of economic thought. In T. H. Jo & Z. Todorova (eds) Advancing the Frontiers of Heterodox Economics: Essays in Honor of Frederic S. Lee. Abington: Routledge.

Dolado, J.J., Felgueroso F. & Almunia M. (2008). Do men and women-economists choose the same research fields?: Evidence from top-50 departments. IZA Discussion Paper. 1859.

European Commission (2003, 2006, 2009, 2012). She Figures - Women and Science – Statistics and Indicators. Bruxelles. European Commission.

Forget, E. (1995). America women economists, 1900-1940: doctoral dissertation and research specialization. In M.A. Dimand, R Dimand & E. Forget (eds) Women of value. Edward Elgar: 25-38.

Ginther, D.K. & S. Khan (2004). Women in Economics: Moving up or Falling Off the academic Career Ladder?. Journal of Economic Perspective. 18(3): 193-214.

Ginther, D.K., S. Khan (2006). Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001. NBER WP 12691.

Giraud Y. & Duarte P. G. (2014). Chasing the B: A Bibliographic Account of Economics’ Relation to its Past, 1991-2011. Thema Working Paper. Université de Cergy Pontoise 09.

Hale G. & T. Regev (2014). Gender ratios at top PhD programs in economics. Economics of Education Review 41:55-70.

Hale, G. (2005). How do women economists choose their field? Evidence of Path dependence. Yale University. Mimeo.

Hamermesh, D.S. (2005). An old male economist’s advice to young female economists. CSWEP Newsletter.

Husu, L. (2004). Gate-keeping, gender equality and scientific excellence. Gender and Excellence in the Making 69.

Indipendent Evaluation Office of IMF (2011). Annul Report 2011. International Monetary Fund, http://www.ieo-imf.org/ieo/files/annualreports/2011Report.pdf.

Kelly, M. A. & S. Bruestle (2011). Trend of Subjects Published in Economics Journals 1969–2007. Economic Inquiry 49 (3): 658–673.

King MM, Correll SJ, Jacque J, Bergstrom CT & JD West (2015). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Mimeo. http://www.eigenfactor.org/gender/self-citation/SelfCitation.pdf.

Kosnik L. R. (2015). What Have Economists Been Doing for the Last 50 Years? A Text Analysis of Published Academic Research from 1960–2010. Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9: 1-38.

Lee, F. S. & W. Elsner (2008). Publishing, Ranking, and the Future of Heterodox Economics. On the Borizon 16(4): 176-184.

Lee, F. S. & S. Harley (1998). Peer Review, the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics. Capital and Class, 66: 23-51.

LERU (2015). Gendered Research and Innovation. Advice Paper 18.

Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbio, F. & M. Pezzoni (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: a study on French and Italian physicist. Industrial and Corporate Change. 20(1): 253-294.

Maes, K., Buitendijk, S., Rahm Hallberg I. & B. Mantilleri (2012). Women, research and universities: excellence without gender bias. LERU position papers.

Marcuzzo, M.C. & G. Zacchia (2010). Weight for citations or weights for numerousness? Evaluating Italy's academic economists. Politica economica. 3(10): 409-440.

Marcuzzo, M.C. & G. Zacchia (2015). Is History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? A Quantitative Investigation. Storepapers 4.

Mc Dowell, J.M., Singell, L. & J.P. Ziliak (1999). Cracks in the Glass Ceiling: Gender and Promotion in the Economics Profession. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 89 (2): 392-396.

McGuire, L. K., Bergen, M. R. & M. L. Polan, (2004). Career advancement for women faculty in a US school of medicine: Perceived needs Academic Medicine. 79(4): 319–325.

Pasinetti, L.L. & A. Roncaglia (2006). The human sciences in Italy: the case of political economy. Rivista italiana degli economisti, 11: 461-499.

Pautasso, M. (2015). The Italian university habilitation and the challenge of increasing the representation of women in academia. Challenges, 6(1): 26-41.

Rath K. & K. Wohlrabe (2016). Trends in economics publications represented by JEL categories between 2007 and 2013. Applied Economics Letters, 23:9.

Robeyns, I. (2001). Teoria femminista ed economia femminista. In AA.VV. Gli studi delle donne in Italia. Roma: Carocci.

Rosselli, A., Parisi Acquaviva D., A. Carabelli (1999). Che genere di economista?: la professione di economista nell'università italiana. Bologna: Il mulino.

Sarsons, H. (2015). Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work, Harvard University Working Paper.

Vesterlund, L., Babcock L. & L. Weingart (2013). Breaking the Glass Ceiling with No: Gender Differences in Declining Requests for Non- Promotable Tasks. Pittsburgh Experimental Economics Lab working paper.

Xie, Y. & K.A. Shaumen (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence About an Old Puzzle, American Sociological Review. 63 (6):847-870.

Wright, A. L., Schwindt, L. A., Bassford, T. L., Reyna, V. F., Shisslak, C. M., Germain, P. A. S. & K. L. Reed (2003). Gender differences in academic advancement: Patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US college of medicine. Academic Medicine. 78(5): 500–508.

Zacchia G. (2012). Differenza di Genere e di Passo. Gli ultimi 11 anni delle economiste accademiche italiane. Meno di Zero, 3(8-9).

Zinovyeva, N. & M. Bagues, (2011). Does gender matter for academic promotion? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper 5537.