Re-examining Kuznets Hypothesis: Does Data Matter?

Jalil, Mohammad Muaz (2009): Re-examining Kuznets Hypothesis: Does Data Matter?

Abstract

Kuznets Hypothesis has been in debate since Simon Kuznets published his seminal paper “Economic Growth and Income Inequality” hypothesizing that inequality follows an inverted U shaped curve. He suggested that inequality rises as an economy develops, due to urbanization and industrialization, which later is abated as leveling forces gradually reduces inequality. Extensive research has been done in this arena but consensus is yet to be reached. In this paper we test the robustness of Kuznets hypothesis by employing newly available EHII and UTIP manufacturing pay inequality dataset which has been developed by University of Texas Inequality Project. Panel unit root tests are undertaken to develop the parametric equation for testing the hypothesis. We also use various econometric methods (Fixed Effect, dynamic panel analysis, fixed effect with autoregressive term) to analyze the effect of economic model on existence or absence of Kuznets Curve. Data are also segregated to Global dataset and OECD dataset, one including all the countries in the world and the other only OECD countries respectively. The objective is to see if there exists a different inequality dynamics for highly developed economy. The paper found that income variables should be in log formed and not level form while testing the hypothesis, as otherwise they are not stationary. It was also found that gender segregated cohort size has an implication for inequality, with matured male cohort having negative and matured female cohort size having positive relation with inequality In relation to Kuznets hypothesis it was found that inverted U shaped curve appears in case of D&S and WIID2 data but U shape curve appears in case of EHII and UTIP dataset. In case of OECD countries the difference is enhanced. The primary reason rests on rising manufacturing pay inequality which EHII captures. It is hypothesized that inequality follows a zigzag pattern with inequality rising and falling as economy develops and moves from an agrarian to an urbanized industrialized economy. This is in line with Kuznets hypothesis. After that, the economy faces major technological innovations which on onset increase the inequality within the manufacturing sector first but given the industrialized nature of the economy, this translates quickly to overall rise in inequality. Hence it seems that absence or presence of Kuznets curve greatly depends on the usage of inequality dataset. It is suggested that existing EHII dataset may be augmented by basing it on WIID2 instead of D & S and by making estimates which are gross of individual income resulting in data harmonization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Kuznet, Panel Data, EHII,UTIP, D&S and WIID2, Inequality
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity; Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y4 - Dissertations (unclassified)

References

Adelman, I. and Morris C. (1973). Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries, Stanford University Press.

Ahluwalia, M. (1976a). Income Distribution and Development: Some Stylized Facts. American Economic Review 66(2), pp. 128-135.

Ahluwalia, M. (1976b). Inequality, Poverty and Development. Journal of Development Economics, 3, 307-342.

Alderson, Arthur S, Nielsen, Francois (2002), Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries, American Journal of Sociology Volume 107 Number 5 (March 2002): 1244–99

Angeles-Castro, Gerardo, (2006) The relationship between economic growth and inequality: evidence from the age of market liberalism No 2, Proceedings of the German Development, Economics Conference, Berlin

Anand, S. and Kanbur, S.M.R. (1993). Inequality and development: A critique. Journal of Development Economics, 41, 19–43.

Atkinson, A. B. and Bourguignon, F. (2000). Introduction: Income Distribution and Economics, in A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution: Volume 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Atkinson, A.B. and Brandolini, A. (2001). Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of ‘Secondary’ Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study, Journal of Economic Literature, 39(3): 771-799.

Augustin Kwasi Fosu (1993), Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis: Comment, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 59, No. 3. (Jan., 1993), pp. 523-527

Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, Goswami,Gour Gobinda Mebratu (2006), Solomon. Black Market Premium and Income Distribution, The Journal of Developing Areas - Volume 39, Number 2, Spring 2006, pp. 17-28

Barro, R.J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries; Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 5–32.

Bourguignon, F. and Morrison C. (1990). Income Distribution, Development and Foreign Trade: A Cross-sectional Analysis, European Economic Review, 34, 1113-1132.

Braulke, M. (1983). A Note on Kuznets' U. Review of Economics and Statistics. 65, 135-139.

Campano, F. and Salvatore, D. (1988). Economic Development, Income Distribution and the Kuznets’ U-Shaped Hypothesis, Journal of Policy Modelling, 10, 265-280.

Chen, Been-Lon (2003). An inverted-U relationship between inequality and long-run growth, Economics Letters 78, 205–212

Chong Alberto (2004). Inequality, Democracy, and Persistence: Is There a Political Kuznets Curve?, No 4253, RES Working Papers from Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department

Clarke, G. (1995). More evidence on income distribution and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 47, 403-428.

Dawson, P.J. (1997). On testing Kuznets’ economic growth hypothesis, Applied Economics Letters, 4, 409-410.

Deaton, A. and Zaidi, S. (2002). Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. LSMS Working Paper No. 135, Washington, D. C. The World Bank.

Deininger, K. and Squire, L. (1996). A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality, The World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565-92.

Deininger, K., and Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57, 259–287.

Fields, G.S. (1979). A Welfare Economic Approach to Growth and Distribution in the Dual Economy, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 325-353.

Forbes, K. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review 90, 869–887.

Frazer, G. (2006). Inequality and Development Across and Within Countries. World Development, 34(9), 1459–1481.

Galbraith, J. K. and Kum, H. (2003) Estimating the Inequality of Household Incomes: Filling Gaps and Correcting Errors in Deininger & Squire, Inequality Project, UTIP Working Paper 22, The University of Texas at Austin

Galbraith, J.K. and Hyunsub Kum (2003), Inequality and Economic Growth: A Global View Based on Measures of Pay, CESifo Economic Studies, Vol. 49, 4/2003, 527-556

Galbraith, J.K. and Hyunsub Kum (2004), Estimating the Inequality of Household Incomes: A Statistical Approach to the Creation of a Dense and Consistent Global Data Set, UTIP Working Paper 22 (revised version V), The University of Texas at Austin

Gourdon, Julien (2006), Openness and Inequality in Developing Countries: A New Look at the Evidence, Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Gujarati, D. N. (2003) Basic Econometrics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 4th Ed.

Hayashi Fumio (2000): Econometrics, Princeton University Press

Hsing, Y. and Smith, D. (1994). Kuznets’ inverted-U hypothesis revisited, Applied Economic Letters, 1, 111-113.

Huang, H-C (River) (2004). A flexible nonlinear inference to the Kuznets hypothesis, Economics Letters, 84, 289–296.

Jalil, Mohammad Muaz and Khasru, Munir (2004), Revisiting Kuznets Hypothesis: A Time Series and Panel Data Approach, Bangladesh Development Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3-4, pp. 89-112

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.

Lecaillon, J., Paukert, F., Morrison, C. and Germidis, D. (1984). Income Distribution and Economic Development: An Analytical Survey. Geneva: International Labor Office.

Li, H., Zou, H. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics 2 (3), 318–334.

Li, H., Squire, L. and Zou, H. (1998). Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality, Economic Journal, 108, 26–43.

Mátyás, L., Konya, L. and Macquarie, L. (1998). The Kuznets U-curve hypothesis: some panel data Evidence Applied Economics Letters, 5, 693-697.

Oshima, H. (1970). Income Inequality and Economic Growth: The post-war experience of Asian Countries, Malayan Economic Review, 15; 7-41.

Papanek, G.F., and Kyn, O. (1986). The Effect on Income Distribution of Development, the Growth Rate, and Economic Strategy, Journal of Development Economics, 23; 55-65.

Paukert, F. (1973). Income Distribution at Different Levells of Development: A Survey of the Evidence, International Labour Review, 108; 97-125.

Pessoa, Argentino (2008), Kuznets Hypothesis and the Data constraints, FEP Working Papers, Faculdade De Economia, Universidade Do Porto

Robinson, S. (1976). A Note on the U Hypothesis Relating Income Inequality and Economic Development. American Economic Review, 66(3); 437-440.

Saith, A. (1983). Development and Distribution: A Critique of the Cross-country U Hypothesis, Journal of Development Economics, 13, 367-382.

Savvides Andreas (1999), On the Turning Point in the Inequality-Development Relationship: Evidence from Six Inequality Measures, Journal Of Economic Development, Volume 24, Number 1

Ram, Rati. (1991). Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis: Evidence from a highly developed country. Southern Economic Journal 57: 11 12-23.

Ram, R. (1997), Level of Economic Development and Income Inequality: Evidence from the Postwar Developed World, Southern Economic Journal, 64, 576-8.

Thornton, J. (2001). The Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis: panel data evidence from 96 countries. Applied Economics Letters, 8, 15-16.

UNU-WIDER (2005). World Income Inequality Database V 2.0a, User Guide and Data Sources, June 2005, World Institute for Economics Development, United Nations University.

Vicente, J. and Borge, L. (2000). Inequality and growth: inverted and uninverted Ushapes, Applied Economics Letters, 2000, 7, 497-500.

Williamson,Jeffrey G , Mathew Higgins (2002), Explaining Inequality the World Round: Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, and Openness, Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3

World Bank (2006). World Development Indicators, data set available on CD-Rom.

Wooldridge Jeffrey (2001) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach: South-Western College Publication, 2nd Ed

Xavier Sala-i-Martin, (2002), “The Disturbing Rise of Global Income Inequality” NBER working paper 8904, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8904