Retail Channel Management in Consumer Search Markets

Garcia, Daniel and Janssen, Maarten (2016): Retail Channel Management in Consumer Search Markets.

Abstract

We study how a monopoly manufacturer optimally manages her contractual relations with retailers in markets with consumer search. By choosing wholesale prices, the manufacturer affects the degree of competition between retailers and the incentives of consumers to search. We show that depending on whether or not the manufacturer can commit to her price decisions and on the search cost, the manufacturer may be substantially better off choosing her wholesale prices not independent of each other, consciously allowing for asymmetric contracts. Thus, our analysis may shed light on when we may expect sales across different retailers to be positively or negatively correlated. Our model may be able to generate loss leaders at the wholesale level and show the rationale for creating ”premium resellers”.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Consumer Search, Retailing, Pricing
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M30 - General

References

DeGraba, Patrick, "Input market price discrimination and the choice of technology," The American Economic Review, 1990, 80 (5), 1246-1253.

Diamond, Peter, "A Model of Price Adjustment", Journal of Economic Theory, 1971, 3 (2), 156-168.

Garcia, Daniel, Jun Honda, and Maarten Janssen, "The Double Diamond Paradox", American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Forthcoming.

Hess, James D and Eitan Gerstner, "Loss leader pricing and rain check policy", Marketing Science, 1987, 6 (4), 358-374.

Inderst, Roman, "Models of vertical market relations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2010, 28 (4), 341-344.

Inderst, Roman,and Tommaso Valletti, "Price discrimination in input markets," The RAND Journal of Economics, 2009, 40 (1), 1-19.23

Janssen, Maarten and Sandro Shelegia, "Consumer Search and Double Marginalization" American Economic Review, 2015, 105 (6), 1-29.

Janssen, Maarten and Alexei Parakhonyak, "Consumer search markets with costly revisits," Economic Theory, 2014, 55 (2), 481-514.

Janssen, Maarten C.W., Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez, and Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, "Truly Costly Sequential Search and Olipolistic Pricing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2005, 23 (5), 451-466.

Kaplan, Greg, Guido Menzio, Leena Rudanko, and Nicholas Trachter, "Relative Price Dispersion: Evidence and Theory," Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.

Katz, Michael L, "The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good markets," The American Economic Review, 1987, pp. 154-167.

Lal, Rajiv and Carmen Matutes, "Retail pricing and advertising strategies," Journal of Business, 1994, pp. 345-370.

Lubensky, Dmitry, "A model of recommended retail prices," Available at SSRN 2049561, 2013.

McAfee, R. Preston and Marius Schwartz, "Opportunism in Multilateral Vertical Contracting: Nondiscrimination, Exclusivity, and Uniformity," American Economic Review, 1994, 84 (1), 210-230.

Pesendorfer, Martin, "Retail Sales: A Study of Pricing Behavior in Supermarkets," Journal of Business, 2002, 75 (1), 33-66.

Rey, Patrick and Thibaud Verge, "Bilateral control with vertical contracts," RAND Journal of Economics, 2004, pp. 728-746.

Sobel, Joel, "The Timing of Sales," Review of Economic Studies, 1984, 42 (3), 353-368.

Stahl, Dale O., "Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search," American Economic Review, 1989, 79 (4), 700-712.

Varian, Hal R., "A Model of Sales," American Economic Review, 1980, 70 (4), 651-659.

Yoshida, Yoshihiro, "Third-degree price discrimination in input markets: output and welfare," The American Economic Review, 2000, 90 (1), 240-246.