Micro-Economical Aspects of Public Projects: Impact Factors for Project Efficiency and Sustainability

Pulmanis, Emils (2015): Micro-Economical Aspects of Public Projects: Impact Factors for Project Efficiency and Sustainability. Published in: Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives , Vol. 3, No. 1 (16 April 2015): pp. 272-285.

Abstract

Project management approach in the public administration becoming gradually applied tool for implementation of different public programs and activities. Latvia has several methodological documentations to evaluate the possible benefits from infrastructure but still there is need for improvements as the only clear defined methodology is for transport sectors and those which have been provided by the European commission, but not always have been practically used in local municipalities’ project evaluations. Public projects, and planning for such projects, generally have the following characteristics: • Such projects are inherently risky due to long planning horizons and complex interfaces. • Technology is often not standard. • Decision making and planning are often multi-actor processes with conflicting interests. • Often the project scope or ambition level will change significantly over time. • Statistical evidence shows that such unplanned events are often unaccounted for, leaving budget contingencies sorely inadequate. • As a consequence, misinformation about costs, benefits, and risks is the norm. • The result is cost overruns and/or benefit shortfalls with a majority of projects. Paper exanimates public project management applications in the context of the underlying structure that adverse dynamics and their application to specific areas for micro-economical level of project management, synthesizes the policy messages, and provides directions for future research. Public sector project management in Latvia become popular in recent years as there is different type of public funding sources available. The paper examined the application of the project management practice and its micro-economic aspects in public sector in Latvia. Public sector project management in Latvia become popular in recent years as there is different type of public funding sources available. The paper describes the public sector project management practice in Latvia. Study shows that public sector project maturity level is low and should be improved. Research period covers the time from January 2013 – March 2015.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: project management, project planning and initialization, public sector, efficiency
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O22 - Project Analysis

References

Abbasi, Y. G. & Al-Mharmah (2000). “Project management practice by the public sector in a developing country”, International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), pp. 105-109.

Arnaboldi M., Azzone G., & Savoldelli A. (2004) “Managing public sector project: the case of the Italian Treasury Ministry”, International Journal of Project management, 22(3), pp. 213-223.

Baranskaya ,A (2007). Project Management in Public Administration of Transitional Countries, Moscow State University, School of Public Administration, Russia.

Bradley J, et al. 2005. An Integrated Micro-Macro (IMM) Approach To The Evaluation Of Large- Scale Public Investment Programmes: The Case Of EU Structural Funds. GEFRA. 2005. 98 p.

D.I. Cleland (1999). Project management: Strategic Design and Implementation, McGraw-Hill.

Feasibility Study for a simplifying European Union fund management system, (2009) Ltd. GF Consulting, 62 p.

Gower, D G (1992). ‘Project management – an overview’ Association of Project Managers, UK (UK Institution of Electrical Engineers professional brief).

Grigorescu Adriana (2011). Management of public sector investment projects, course support, National School of Politic and Administrative Studies (SNSPA) in Bucharest

Langley, Mark (2015). Administrative Reforms, Capacity-Building and Cohesion Policy. Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy in 2014-2020: An Academic and Policy Debate, European Union, 2015, p28, ISBN:978-92-79-45233-8

Morris, P W G (Ed.) (1992). APM Body of Knowledge and Experience Association of Project Managers, UK.

Philip, P., Local public administration management - a practical approach, Economic Publishing House, Bucharest, 2007, p. 241, 244

Pūlmanis, Emīls (2012), Evaluation of Regional Development financial instruments funded project management, First International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Countries “Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives”: Riga, Latvia, February 8-9, 2012. Conference Proceedings. Riga: University of Latvia, 244 p.

Pūlmanis, Emīls (2013). Polycentric Development Projects Initialisation Process Problems in Latvia/ Emils Pulmanis, Zaneta Ilmete. Bibliogr. : p.224 // Integrated and sustainable regional development: proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development"(Economic science for rural development; N 31). Jelgava: Latvia Agriculture University, p.220-224.

Pūlmanis, Emīls (2015). Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy in 2014-2020: An Academic and Policy Debate. // PM World Journal. ISSN 2330-4480. Vol.3, N 11 (2014), p.1-5: fig. Databases of EBSCO Publishing, Inc. Pūlmanis, Emīls. Public sector project management application and sustainability problems: case of EU member state - Latvia / Emīls Pūlmanis. References: p.31-34 // PM World Journal. ISSN 2330-4480. Vol.3, N 11 (2014), p.1-35: fig. Databases of EBSCO Publishing, Inc.

Pūlmanis, Emīls. Public sector project management efficiency problems and solutions, case of EU member state - Latvia / Emīls Pūlmanis. bibliogr. // A business sustainability index - findings and framework: International Conference on Business and Management, June 17-19, 2014, Taipei, Taiwan: proceedings. 2014. 15 p.: fig

Reiss, G (1992). Project Management Demystified E & F Spon.

Scale Public Investment Programmes: The Case of EU Structural Funds. GEFRA. 2005. 98 p.

Soderlund, J. (2004) Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 183-191.

Sprague, R. H. and Carlson, E. D. (1982). Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, p. 314.

State Government of Victoria, Department of Treasury and Finance, Investment Management Standard, 2010.

The Government Extension to A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). USA: Project Management Institute Inc., 2006

Van Gundy, A. B. Jr. (1988). Techniques of Structured Problem Solving. 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand, R, p. 286.

Wostner, P. 2008. The Micro-efficiency of EU Cohesion Policy, European Policy Research Papers. No 64, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow