Sokolovskyi, Dmytro (2016): Zastosowanie behawioralnych czynników do oceny i zarządzania poziomem konkurencyjnością przedsiębiorstw.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74849.pdf Download (351kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to exploration and appliance of duality principle in firm behavior. The duality of firm’s behavior in contrast to non-vector one is stated; based on this approach the exploration of firm’s activity taking into account the targets and tools of their achievement, which are sometimes the opposed is suggested. The company model, containing notably the indicator of objective quality of output, is proposed, and also the model of interaction of “principal – agent” type. It’s shown that this given models can be used to analyze certain problems at levels of running of the organization, “company – state” and “company – market” types of relationship.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Zastosowanie behawioralnych czynników do oceny i zarządzania poziomem konkurencyjnością przedsiębiorstw |
English Title: | The use of behavioral factors for the assessment and management of competitiveness of firms |
Language: | Polish |
Keywords: | firm behavior; duality; quality of good; model “principal – agent” |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory |
Item ID: | 74849 |
Depositing User: | pan Dmytro Sokolowski |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2016 08:10 |
Last Modified: | 15 Oct 2019 16:39 |
References: | Coase, R. H. (1937), The Nature of the Firm, Economics, New Series, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386-405. Forrester, J. W. (1968), Industrial Dynamics, OR: Productivity Press, Portland. Hayek, F. (1944), The Road to Serfdom, Routledge Press, London. Hart, O. & Holmstrom, B. (1987), The Theory of Contracts, in Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, F. Truman (ed.), Bewley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107-109. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263-291. Keynes, J. M. (1937), The General Theory of Employment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 209-223. Kоtler, P. (1984), Marketing Essentials, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.Y. Machina, M. (1987), Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Undsolved, Journal of Economic Perspectives, no. 1, pp. 121-154. Mouhammed, A. H. (1999), Veblen and Keynes: On the Economic Theory of the Capitalist Economy, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 155, pp. 594-609. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1990), An Evolutionary theory of Economic change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. von Neuman, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of games and economic behaviour, Princeton University Press, Princeton. North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional change and Economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1982), The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations, Journal of Economic Literature, June 1982, vol. XX, no. 2, pp. 529-563. Шаститко, А. (2001), Неполные контракты: проблемы определения и моделирования, Вопросы экономики,no. 6, pp. 80-99. Simon, H. A. (1955), A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, February, pp. 174-183. Simon, H. (1956), Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment, Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 129-138. Simon, H. A. (1978), Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought, American Economic Review, vol.68, No. 2, pp. 1-16. Соколовський, Д. Б. (2009), «Квазістатистичні» функції корисності, як інструмент окреслення економічної поведінки аґентів у системі сплати податків, Наукові записки. Серія Економічна, no. 11, НУ «Острозька академія», Острог, pp.152-159. Соколовський, Д. Б. (2012), Формалізація загальної моделі економічної взаємодії, Бізнес-Інформ, no. 4, pp. 6-9. Stiglitz, J. E. (1987), Principal and Agent, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics: Macmillan, London. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000), Economics of the Public Sector, W W Norton & Company Incorporated, N.Y. Тамбовцев, В. Л. (1996), К типологии контрактов, Экономика и математические методы, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 152-160. Thevenot, L. (1989), Équilibre et rationalité dans un univers complexe, Revue économique lien Année,vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 147-198. Цимбурский, В. Л. (1995), Человек политический между ratio и ответами на стимулы. К исчислению когнитивных типов принятия решений, ПОЛИС, no. 5, pp.22-28. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, 27 September 1974, vol. 185, no. 4157 pp. 1124-1131. Veber, М. (1996), Основные социологические понятия, in Западно-европейская социология ХIX – начала ХХ веков, Dobren’kov VI (ed.), Междунар. ун-т бизнеса и упр., Москва, pp. 455-491. Veblen, T. (1994), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, Penguin Books, N.Y. Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, The Free Press, N.Y. Williamson, O. (1991), Comparative Economic Organization The Analysis of discrete Structural Alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.36, p.271. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74849 |